Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-2pp2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T08:44:29.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploitation of nuclear and cytoplasm variability in Hordeum chilense for wheat breeding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2011

Cristina Rodríguez-Suárez ,
María J. Giménez ,
María C. Ramírez ,
Azahara C. Martín ,
Natalia Gutierrez ,
Carmen M. Ávila ,
Antonio Martín  and
Sergio G. Atienza
Cristina Rodríguez-Suárez
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Department, IAS-CSIC, Apdo. 4084, E-14080, Córdoba, Spain
María J. Giménez
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Department, IAS-CSIC, Apdo. 4084, E-14080, Córdoba, Spain
María C. Ramírez
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Department, IAS-CSIC, Apdo. 4084, E-14080, Córdoba, Spain
Azahara C. Martín
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Department, IAS-CSIC, Apdo. 4084, E-14080, Córdoba, Spain Área Mejora y Biotecnología, IFAPA-Centro Alameda del Obispo, Córdoba, Spain
Natalia Gutierrez
Affiliation:
Área Mejora y Biotecnología, IFAPA-Centro Alameda del Obispo, Córdoba, Spain
Carmen M. Ávila
Affiliation:
Área Mejora y Biotecnología, IFAPA-Centro Alameda del Obispo, Córdoba, Spain
Antonio Martín
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Department, IAS-CSIC, Apdo. 4084, E-14080, Córdoba, Spain
Sergio G. Atienza*
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Department, IAS-CSIC, Apdo. 4084, E-14080, Córdoba, Spain
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: sgatienza@ias.csic.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hordeum chilense Roem. et Schultz. is a diploid wild barley native to Chile and Argentina. The high crossability of this species with other members of the Triticeae tribe promoted the development of the new species × Tritordeum Ascherson et Graebner. Hexaploid tritordeum was developed from the hybrid derived from the cross between H. chilense (used as female parent) and durum wheat. The interest of H. chilense is based on the presence of traits potentially useful for wheat breeding, including high endosperm carotenoid content, septoria tritici blotch resistance and abiotic stress tolerance. Besides, the variability at cytoplasm level is also important in this species. The development of common wheat–H. chilense alloplasmic lines (nucleus from wheat and cytoplasm from H. chilense) results in fertile or male sterile genotypes, depending on the accession donating the cytoplasm. Furthermore, these alloplasmic lines constitute an ideal system for deepening our knowledge on nuclear–cytoplasm interactions. In conclusion, H. chilense is an interesting source of variability for wheat breeding.

Keywords

cytoplasmHordeum chilenseplant breedingplasmonwild relatives

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , July 2011 , pp. 313 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aksyonova, E, Sinyavskaya, M, Danilenko, N, Pershina, L, Nakamura, C and Davydenko, O (2005) Heteroplasmy and paternally oriented shift of the organellar DNA composition in barley–wheat hybrids during backcrosses with wheat parents. Genome 48: 761–769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, JO (2005) Effect of teosinte cytoplasmic genomes on maize phenotype. Genetics 169: 863–880.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvarez, JB, Martin, LM and Martin, A (1999) Genetic variation for carotenoid pigment content in the amphiploid Hordeum chilense × Triticum turgidum conv. durum. Plant Breeding 118: 187–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atienza, SG, Gimenez, MJ, Martin, A and Martin, LM (2000) Variability in monomeric prolamins in Hordeum chilense. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101: 970–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atienza, SG, Alvarez, JB, Villegas, AM, Gimenez, MJ, Ramirez, MC, Martin, A and Martin, LM (2002) Variation for the low-molecular-weight glutenin subunits in a collection of Hordeum chilense. Euphytica 128: 269–277.Google Scholar
Atienza, SG, Ramirez, CM, Hernandez, P and Martin, A (2004) Chromosomal location of genes for carotenoid pigments in Hordeum chilense. Plant Breeding 123: 303–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atienza, SG, Avila, CM, Ramirez, MC and Martin, A (2005a) Application of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy to the determination of carotenoid content in tritordeum for breeding purposes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56: 85–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atienza, SG, Satovic, Z, Martin, A and Martin, LM (2005b) Genetic diversity in Hordeum chilense Roem. et Schult. germplasm collection as determined by endosperm storage proteins. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52: 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atienza, SG, Avila, CM and Martin, A (2007a) The development of a PCR-based marker for PSY1 from Hordeum chilense, a candidate gene for carotenoid content accumulation in tritordeum seeds. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58: 767–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atienza, SG, Ballesteros, J, Martin, A and Hornero-Mendez, D (2007b) Genetic variability of carotenoid concentration and degree of esterification among tritordeum ( × Tritordeum Ascherson et Graebner) and durum wheat accessions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 55: 4244–4251.Google Scholar
Atienza, SG, Martin, AC and Martin, A (2007c) Introgression of wheat chromosome 2D or 5D into tritordeum leads to free-threshing habit. Genome 50: 994–1000.Google Scholar
Atienza, SG, Martin, AC, Ramirez, MC, Martin, A and Ballesteros, J (2007d) Effects of Hordeum chilense cytoplasm on agronomic traits in common wheat. Plant Breeding 126: 5–8.Google Scholar
Atienza, SG, Ramirez, MC, Martin, A and Ballesteros, J (2007e) Effects of reciprocal crosses on agronomic performance of tritordeum. Russian Journal of Genetics 43: 865–868.Google Scholar
Atienza, SG, Martín, A, Pecchioni, N, Platani, C and Cattivelli, L (2008) The nuclear–cytoplasmic interaction controls carotenoid content in wheat. Euphytica 159: 325–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badaeva, ED, Pershina, LA and Bildanova, LL (2006) Cytogenetic analysis of alloplasmic recombinant lines (H. vulgare)–T. aestivum unstable in fertility and viability. Russian Journal of Genetics 42: 140–149.Google Scholar
Bolot, S, Abrouk, M, Masood-Quraishi, U, Stein, N, Messing, J, Feuillet, C and Salse, J (2009) The inner circle of the cereal genomes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 12: 119–125.Google Scholar
Castillo, A, Budak, H, Martin, AC, Dorado, G, Borner, A, Roder, M and Hernandez, P (2010) Interspecies and intergenus transferability of barley and wheat D-genome microsatellite markers. Annals of Applied Biology 156: 347–356.Google Scholar
Cherif-Mouaki, S, Said, M, Alvarez, JB and Cabrera, A (2011) Sub-arm location of prolamin and EST-SSR loci on chromosome 1Hch from Hordeum chilense. Euphytica. doi 10.1007/s10681-010-0268-y.Google Scholar
Chung, S-M and Staub, JE (2003) The development and evaluation of consensus chloroplast primer pairs that possess highly variable sequence regions in a diverse array of plant taxa. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107: 757–767.Google Scholar
Crosatti, C, Quansah, L, Atienza, SG, Mare, C, Fait, A and Cattivelli, L (2010) Exploitation of diversity in nuclear–cytoplasm interaction using alloplasmic wheat lines. 2nd International Symposium on Genomics of Plant Genetic Resources, Bologna, Italy, p. 86.Google Scholar
Hagras, AAA, Kishii, M, Sato, K, Tanaka, H and Tsujimoto, H (2005a) Extended application of barley EST markers for the analysis of alien chromosomes added to wheat genetic background. Breeding Science 55: 335–341.Google Scholar
Hagras, AAA, Kishii, M, Tanaka, H, Sato, K and Tsujimoto, H (2005b) Genomic differentiation of Hordeum chilense from H. vulgare as revealed by repetitive and EST sequences. Genes and Genetic Systems 80: 147–159.Google Scholar
Inostroza, L, del Pozo, A, Matus, I, Castillo, D, Hayes, P, Machado, S and Corey, A (2009) Association mapping of plant height, yield, and yield stability in recombinant chromosome substitution lines (RCSLs) using Hordeum vulgare subsp. spontaneum as a source of donor alleles in a Hordeum vulgare subsp. vulgare background. Molecular Breeding 23: 365–376.Google Scholar
Kihara, H (1951) Substitution of nucleus and its effects on genome manifestations. Cytologia 16: 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laser, B, Mohr, S, Odenbach, W, Oettler, G and Kück, U (1997) Parental and novel copies of the mitochondrial orf25 gene in the hybrid crop-plant triticale: predominant transcriptional expression of the maternal gene copy. Current Genetics 32: 337–347.Google Scholar
Loessl, A, Goetz, M, Braun, A and Wenzel, G (2000) Molecular markers for cytoplasm in potato: male sterility and contribution of different plastid–mitochondrial configurations to starch production. Euphytica 116: 221–230.Google Scholar
Martin, AC (2009) Desarrollo de un nuevo sistema de androesterilidad en trigo (Triticum aestivum L.) utilizando la especie Hordeum chilense Roem. et Schultz. PhD Thesis, University of Córdoba, Spain.Google Scholar
Martin, A and Chapman, V (1977) A hybrid between Hordeum chilense and Triticum aestivum. Cereal Research Communications 5: 365–368.Google Scholar
Martin, A, Martín, LM, Cabrera, A, Ramírez, MC, Giménez, MJ, Rubiales, P, Hernández, P and Ballesteros, J (1998) The potential of Hordeum chilense in breeding Triticeae species. In: Jaradat, AA (ed.) Triticeae III. Enfield, CT: Science Publications, pp. 377–386.Google Scholar
Martin, A, Alvarez, JB, Martin, LM, Barro, F and Ballesteros, J (1999) The development of tritordeum: a novel cereal for food processing. Journal of Cereal Science 30: 85–95.Google Scholar
Martin, AC, Atienza, SG and Barro, F (2008a) Use of ccSSR markers for the determination of the purity of alloplasmic wheat in different Hordeum cytoplasms. Plant Breeding 127: 470–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, AC, Atienza, SG, Ramirez, MC, Barro, F and Martin, A (2008b) Male fertility restoration of wheat in Hordeum chilense cytoplasm is associated with 6H(ch)S chromosome addition. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59: 206–213.Google Scholar
Martin, AC, Atienza, SG, Ramirez, MC, Barro, F and Martin, A (2009) Chromosome engineering in wheat to restore male fertility in the msH1 CMS system. Molecular Breeding 24: 397–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, AC, Atienza, SG, Ramírez, M, Barro, F and Martin, A (2010) Molecular and cytological characterization of an extra acrocentric chromosome that restores male fertility of wheat in the msH1 CMS system. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 121: 237–240.Google Scholar
Matsui, K, Yoshida, M, Ban, T, Komatsuda, T and Kawada, N (2002) Role of male-sterile cytoplasm in resistance to barley yellow mosaic virus and Fusarium head blight in barley. Plant Breeding 121: 237–240.Google Scholar
Matus, I, Corey, A, Filichkin, T, Hayes, PM, Vales, MI, Kling, J, Riera-Lizarazu, O, Sato, K, Powell, W and Waugh, R (2003) Development and characterization of recombinant chromosome substitution lines (RCSLs) using Hordeum vulgare subsp. spontaneum as a source of donor alleles in a Hordeum vulgare subsp. vulgare background. Genome 46: 1010–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasuda, S, Kikkawa, Y, Ashida, T, Rafiqul Islam, AKM, Sato, K and Endo, TR (2005) Chromosomal assignment and deletion mapping of barley EST markers. Genes and Genetic Systems 80: 357–366.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Suarez, C, Gimenez, MJ and Atienza, SG (2010) Progress and perspectives for carotenoid accumulation in selected Triticeae species. Crop Pasture Science 61: 743–751.Google Scholar
Said, M and Cabrera, A (2009) A physical map of chromosome 4Hch from H. chilense containing SSR, STS and EST-SSR molecular markers. Euphytica 167: 253–259.Google Scholar
Shonnard, GC and Gepts, P (1994) Genetics of heat tolerance during reproductive development of common bean. Crop Science 34: 1168–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soliman, K, Fedak, G and Allard, RW (1987) Inheritance of organelle DNA in barley and Hordeum × Secale intergeneric hybrids. Genome 29: 867–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanksley, SD and McCouch, SR (1997) Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277: 1063–1066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsunewaki, K (2009) Plasmon analysis in the Triticum–Aegilops complex. Breeding Science 59: 455–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsunewaki, K, Wang, G-Z and Matsuoka, Y (1996) Plasmon analysis of Triticum (wheat) and Aegilops. 1. Production of alloplasmic common whets and their fertilities. Genes and Genetic Systems 71: 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsunewaki, K, Wang, G-Z and Matsuoka, Y (2002) Plasmon analysis of Triticum (wheat) and Aegilops. 2. Characterization and classification of 47 plasmons based on their effects on common wheat phenotype. Genes and Genetic Systems 77: 409–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uprety, DC and Tomar, VK (1993) Photosynthesis and drought resistance of Brassica carinata and its parent species. Photosynthetica 29: 321–327.Google Scholar
van Ginkel, M and Ogbonnaya, F (2007) Novel genetic diversity from synthetic wheats in breeding cultivars for changing production conditions. Field Crops Research 104: 86–94.Google Scholar
Vaz Patto, MC, Aardse, A, Buntjer, J, Rubiales, D, Martin, A and Niks, RE (2001) Morphology and AFLP markers suggest three Hordeum chilense ecotypes that differ in avoidance to rust fungi. Canadian Journal of Botany 79: 204–213.Google Scholar
Voluevich, EA and Buloichik, AA (1992) Nuclear-cytoplasmic interactions in wheat resistance to fungi pathogens: V. Quantitative resistance of alloplasmic line seedlings of Penjamo 672 variety to powdery mildew. Genetika 28: 82–88.Google Scholar
Warburton, M, Crossa, J, Franco, J, Kazi, M, Trethowan, R, Rajaram, S, Pfeiffer, W, Zhang, P, Dreisigacker, S and Ginkel, M (2006) Bringing wild relatives back into the family: recovering genetic diversity in CIMMYT improved wheat germplasm. Euphytica 149: 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, A, Yu, F and Zhang, F (2003) Alien cytoplasm effects on phytosiderophore release in two spring wheats (Triticum aestivum L.). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 50: 767–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar