Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Genetic diversity of two Indian common bean germplasm collections based on morphological and microsatellite markers

  • P. N. Sharma (a1), L. M. Díaz (a2) and M. W. Blair (a2) (a3) (a4)

India is the second most populous nation in the world after China, and its plant genetic resources are an important basis for crop improvement to meet human population needs. An important legume in the diet of the Indian population is common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Common beans are one of the many important legumes grown in India, but unlike others, its centre of origin is not in Asia but in the Americas. The objective of this study was to evaluate two collections of Indian common beans: one for an internationally available collection of Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)-protected accessions and one from the north-western Himalayan region. In total, 149 Indian landraces were evaluated with a total of 24 microsatellites across the two collections, and these represented all common bean-growing states of India. A population structure analysis was used to find groups in each collection, and this was compared across the collections. The genetic analysis of the two sets of Indian accessions with neighbour-joining trees and principal component analysis categorized the landraces into Andean and Mesoamerican gene pool groups. The Andean genotypes dominated the north-western Himalayan collection while the FAO-protected accessions were predominantly Mesoamerican. The Indian subcontinent can be considered as a region of high bean diversity; however, very little introgression was observed between the gene pools in both the germplasm sets. Gene pool identity was further substantiated by the comparison of seed traits, particularly seed size. The role of the landraces in plant breeding programmes is discussed.

Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. E-mail:
Hide All
Afanador L, Hadley S and Kelly JD (1993) Adoption of a mini-prep DNA extraction method for RAPD marker analysis in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Bean Improvement Cooperative 36: 1011.
Asfaw A, Blair MW and Almekinders C (2009) Genetic diversity and population structure of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces from the East African highlands. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 120: 112.
Becerra V, Paredes M, Rojo C, Díaz LM and Blair MW (2010) Microsatellite marker characterization of Chilean common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm. Crop Science 50: 110.
Blair MW, Pedraza F, Buendia HF, Gaitán-Solís E, Beebe SE, Gepts P and Tohme J (2003) Development of a genome-wide anchored microsatellite map for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107: 13621374.
Blair MW, Giraldo MC, Buendia HF, Tovar E, Duque MC and Beebe SE (2006) Microsatellite marker diversity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 113: 100109.
Blair MW, Díaz JM, Hidalgo R, Díaz LM and Duque MC (2007) Microsatellite characterization of Andean races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 116: 2943.
Blair MW, Díaz LM, Buendia HF and Duque MC (2009) Genetic diversity, seed size associations and population structure of a core collection of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 119: 955973.
Blair MW, Gonzales LF, Kimani P, Butare L (2010) Inter-genepool introgression, genetic diversity and nutritional quality of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces from Central Africa. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 121: 237–248.
Broughton WJ, Hernandez G, Blair MW, Beebe SE, Gepts P and Vanderleyden J (2003) Beans (Phaseolus spp.) – model food legumes. Plant and Soil 252: 55128.
Blair MW, Díaz LM, Gil-Langarica H, Mayek Perez N and Acosta JA (2011) Genetic relatedness of Mexican common bean varieties revealed by microsatellite markers. Crop Science 51: 26552667.
Burle ML, Fonseca JR, Kami JA and Gepts P (2010) Microsatellite diversity and genetic structure among common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces in Brazil, a secondary center of diversity. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 121: 801813.
Díaz LM and Blair MW (2006) Race structure within the Mesoamerican gene pool of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as determined by microsatellite markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 114: 143154.
Díaz LM, Buendía HF, Duque MC and Blair MW (2011) Genetic diversity of Colombian landraces of common bean as detected through the use of silver-stained and fluorescently labeled microsatellites. Plant Genetic Resources 9: 8696.
Evano G, Regnaut S and Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14: 26112620.
Ferguson ME, Bramel PJ and Chandra S (2004) Gene diversity among botanical varieties in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Crop Science 44: 18471854.
Garris AJ, Tai TH, Coburn J, Kresovich S and McCouch S (2005) Genetic structure and diversity in Oryza sativa L. Genetics 169: 16311638.
Gepts P and Debouck D (1991) Origin, domestication and evolution of the common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). In: Schoonhoven A and Voysest O (eds) Common Beans: Research for Crop Improvement. Wallingford: CAB International, pp. 754.
Goméz O, Blair MW, Frankow-Lindberg B and Gullberg U (2004) Molecular and phenotypic diversity of common bean landraces from Nicaragua. Crop Science 4: 14121418.
Jose FC, Mohammed MMS, Thomas G, Varghese G, Selvaraj N and Dorai M (2009) Genetic diversity and conservation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae) landraces in Nilgiris. Current Science 97: 227234.
Koenig R and Gepts P (1989) Allozyme diversity in wild Phaseolus vulgaris: further evidence for two mayor centers of genetic diversity. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 78: 809817.
Kumar V, Sharma S, Sharma AK, Kumar M, Sharma S, Malik S, Singh KP, Sanger RS and Bhat KV (2008) Genetic diversity in Indian common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Physiological Molecular Biology of Plants 14: 383387.
Kwak M, Kami JA and Gepts P (2009) The putative Mesoamerican domestication center of Phaseolus vulgaris is located in the Lerma-Santiago basin of Mexico. Crop Science 49: 554563.
Liu K and Muse S (2005) Power Marker: integrated analysis environment for genetic marker data. Bioinformatics 21: 21282129.
Martin GB and Adams MW (1987) Landraces of Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) in northern Malawi. II. Generation and maintenance of variability. Economic Botany 41: 204215.
Masi P, Spagnoletti ZP and Donini P (2003) Development and analysis of multiplex microsatellite markers sets in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Molecular Breeding 11: 303313.
Métais I, Hamon B, Jalouzot R and Peltier D (2002) Structure and level of genetic diversity in various bean types evidenced with microsatellite markers isolated from a genomic enriched library. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 104: 13461352.
Mitchell SE, Kresovich S, Jester CA, Hernandez CJ and Szewc-McFadden AK (1997) Application of multiplex-PR and fluorescence based, semi-automated allele sizing technology for genotyping plant genetic resources. Crop Science 37: 617624.
Pathania A, Sharma PN and Sharma OP (2006) Evaluation of resistance sources and genetics of resistance in kidney bean to Indian virulences of Colletotrichum lindemuthianum. Euphytica 149: 97103.
Payró de la Cruz P, Gepts P, Garcia Marín PC and Villareal DZ (2005) Spatial distribution of genetic diversity in wild populations of Phaseolus vulgaris L. from Guanajuato and Michoacán, México. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52: 589599.
Powell W, Machray GC and Provan J (1996) Polymorphism revealed by simple sequence repeats. Trends in Plant Science 1: 215222.
Pritchard JK, Stephens M and Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945959.
Rodiño AP, Santalla M, González MA, de Ron AM and Singh SP (2006) Novel genetic variation in common bean from the Iberian Peninsula. Crop Science 46: 25402546.
Rohlf F (2002) NTSYS pc. Numerical Taxonomy System Exeter Publishing, Setauket, NY.
Santalla M, Rodiño AP and De Ron AM (2002) Allozyme evidence supporting southwestern Europe as a secondary center of genetic diversity for the common bean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 104: 934944.
Santalla M, Menéndez-Sevillano M, Monteagudo A and De Ron A (2003) Genetic diversity of Argentinean common bean and its evolution during domestication. Euphytica 135: 7587.
SAS Institute (1996) SAS/STAT Users guide 6.11. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
Sharma TR, Rana JC, Sharma R, Rathore R and Sharma PN (2006) Genetic diversity analysis of exotic and Indian accessions of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) using RAPD markers. Indian Journal of Genetics 66: 275278.
Singh SP, Gepts P, Debouck DG (1991a) Races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Economic Botany 45: 379–396.
Singh, SP, Molina A, Urrea C, Gepts P (1991b) Genetic diversity in cultivated Phaseolus vulgaris. II. Marker-based analysis of morphological and agronomic traits. Crop Science 31: 23–29.
Singh SP, Nodari R, Gepts P (1991c) Genetic diversity in cultivated common bean: I. Allozymes. Crop Science 31: 19–23.
Tiwari M, Singh NK, Rathore M and Kumar N (2005) RAPD markers in the analysis of genetic diversity among common bean germplasm from central Himalaya. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52: 315324.
Vavilov NI (1951) The Origin, Variation, Immunity and Breeding of Cultivated Plants. Waltham, MA: Chronica Botanica.
Yeh FY, Boyle R, Ye T and Mao Z (1997) POPGENE, the User-friendly Shareware for Population Genetic Analysis, Version 1.31. Alberta: Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre, University of Alberta.
Zhang X, Blair MW and Wang S (2008) Genetic diversity of Chinese common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces assessed with simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 117: 629640.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Plant Genetic Resources
  • ISSN: 1479-2621
  • EISSN: 1479-263X
  • URL: /core/journals/plant-genetic-resources
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Sharma Supplementary Material

 Word (728 KB)
728 KB


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 24 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 141 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.