Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-gblv7 Total loading time: 0.231 Render date: 2022-05-27T22:26:28.164Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }
  • English
PMLA PMLA

Article contents

Categorically Provisional

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2020

Susan Brown
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 135 , Issue 1: Special Topic Varieties of Digital Humanities , January 2020 , pp. 165 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Susan Brown

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appiah, Kwame Anthony. The Lies That Bind: Rethinking Identity. Liveright / W. W. Norton, 2018.Google Scholar
Berners-Lee, Tim, et al. “The Semantic Web.” Scientific American, Vol. 284, No. 5, 2001, pp. 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Star, Susan Leigh. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. MIT Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Brown, Susan, et al. Orlando: Women's Writing in the British Isles from the Beginnings to the Present. Cambridge UP, 2006-19, orlando.cambridge.org/.Google Scholar
Brown, Susan, and Mandell, Laura. “The Identity Issue.” Journal of Cultural Analytics, 2018, doi:10.22148/16.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciula, Arianna, and Eide, Øyvind. “Modelling in Digital Humanities: Signs in Context.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2016, pp. 33–46.Google Scholar
Day, Ronald E. Indexing It All: The Subject in the Age of Documentation, Information, and Data. MIT Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Acts of Literature. edited by Attridge, Derek, Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Drucker, Johanna. SpecLab: Digital Aesthetics and Projects in Speculative Computing. U of Chicago P, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, Julia, and Jannidis, Fotis. “Data Modeling in a Digital Humanities Context.” The Shape of Data in Digital Humanities: Modeling Texts and Text-Based Resources, edited by Flanders, and Jannidis, , Routledge, 2019, pp. 3–25.Google Scholar
Gruber, Thomas R. “Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 43, nos. 5-6, 1995, pp. 907–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpin, Harry, et al. “When Owl:sameAs Isn't the Same: An Analysis of Identity in Linked Data.” The Semantic Web—ISWC 2010, edited by Patel-Schneider, Peter F. et al., Springer, 2010, pp. 305–20.Google Scholar
Harner, James L. Literary Research Guide. 5th ed., Modern Language Association, 2008.Google Scholar
Holland, Kathryn, and Brown, Susan. “Project, Process, Product: Feminist Digital Subjectivity in a Shifting Scholarly Field.” Bodies of Information: Intersectional Feminism and the Digital Humanities, edited by Losh, Elizabeth and Wernimont, Jacqueline, U of Minnesota P, 2018, pp. 409–33.Google Scholar
“ISO/IEC 5218:2004.” International Standards Organization, 2015, www.iso.org/standard/36266.html.PDF download.Google Scholar
Lesbian and Gay Liberation in Canada Project. Directed by Constance Crompton and Michelle Schwartz, lglc.ca/.Google Scholar
“Linked Data.” W3C Consortium, www.w3.org/wiki/LinkedData.Google Scholar
Liu, Alan. Local Transcendence: Essays on Postmodern Historicism and the Database. U of Chicago P, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandell, Laura. “Gender and Cultural Analytics: Finding or Making Stereotypes.” Debates in the Digital Humanities 2019, edited by Gold, Matthew K. and Klein, Lauren F., U of Minnesota P, 2019, pp. 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Willard. Humanities Computing. 2005. Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar
Nixon, Cheryl. “A Sampling of Results.” Review of The Orlando Project. Eighteenth-Century Fiction, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2009, pp. 375–79.Google Scholar
Oldman, Dominic, et al. “Zen and the Art of Linked Data: New Strategies for a Semantic Web of Humanist Knowledge.” A New Companion to Digital Humanities, edited by Schreibman, Susan et al., Blackwell Publishing, 2016, pp. 251–73.Google Scholar
Olson, Hope A. The Power to Name: Locating the Limits of Subject Representation in Libraries. Springer Science and Business Media, 2013.Google Scholar
Piper, Andrew. Enumerations: Data and Literary Study. U of Chicago P, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Miriam. “What's Next: The Radical, Unrealized Potential of Digital Humanities.” Miriam Posner's Blog, 27 July 2015, miriamposner.com/blog/whats-next-the-radical-unrealized-potential-of-digital-humanities/.Google Scholar
Powell, James, and Hopkins, Matthew. A Librarian's Guide to Graphs, Data and the Semantic Web. Chandos/Elsevier, 2015.Google Scholar
Risam, Roopika. New Digital Worlds: Postcolonial Digital Humanities in Theory, Praxis, and Pedagogy. Northwestern UP, 2019.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Epistemology of the Closet. U of California P, 1990.Google Scholar
Sperberg-McQueen, C. M. “Classification and Its Structures.” A New Companion to Digital Humanities, edited by Schreibman, Susan et al., Blackwell Publishing, 2016, pp. 377–93.Google Scholar
“Surfacing Knowledge, Building Relationships: Indigenous Communities, ARL and Canadian Libraries.” York University Libraries, scbrwiki.library.yorku.ca/.Google Scholar
Wernimont, Jacqueline, and Flanders, Julia. “Feminism in the Age of Digital Archives: The Women Writers Project.” Tulsa Studies in Women's Literature, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2010, pp. 425–35.Google Scholar

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Categorically Provisional
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Categorically Provisional
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Categorically Provisional
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *