Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T13:47:07.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Currency of Feminist Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020


In her essay “what feminism means to me,” the second-wave feminist vivian gornick describes her entry into 1970s feminism in terms that have become very familiar. First, there is the “exhilaration” that comes from feminist analysis, “the particular type of joy [that arises] when a sufficiently large number of people are galvanized by a social explanation of how their lives have taken shape and are gathered together … elaborating the insight and repeating the analysis” (64–65). Then there is the seemingly inevitable declension. “[A]round 1980,” Gornick reports, “feminist solidarity began to unravel. As the world had failed to change sufficiently to reflect our efforts, that which had separated all women before began to reassert itself now in us…. Personalities began to jar, conversations to bore, ideas to repeat themselves” (66–67). While Gornick's account may at this point seem routine, her perspective on the routine makes her description remarkable: in contrast to countless other such reports, Gornick places no blame on the internal politics of feminism itself, either in the form of the critique by radical women of color or in the turn to theory. And, in the absence of this blame laying, something else becomes visible: in Gornick's reckoning, the problem was not so much that feminist analysis was challenged and hence destabilized by internal critique but rather that it remained the same for too long, so that it stopped being exciting and came to feel boring and repetitive instead. In suggesting that repetition in and of itself may be a problem for feminism, Gornick's account gestures toward some of the complex and, I think, usually unexplored relations that feminist theory implies between the new, the politically useful, and the intellectually compelling.

Theories and Methodologies
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Works Cited

Barrett, Michèle. “Words and Things: Materialism and Method in Contemporary Feminist Analysis.” Destablizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates. Ed. Barrett, and Phillips, Anne. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1992. 201–19.Google Scholar
Baumgardner, Jennifer, and Richards, Amy. Manifesta: Young Women, Feminism, and the Future. New York: Farrar, 2000.Google Scholar
Seyla, Benhabib, et al. Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange. New York: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
Wendy, Brown. Edgework: Essays on Knowledge and Politics. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2005.Google Scholar
Wendy, Brown. “Resisting Left Melancholia.” Eng and Kazanjian 458–66.Google Scholar
Wendy, Brown. States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Eng, David, and Kazanjian, David, eds. Loss: The Politics of Mourning. Berkeley: U of California P, 2003.Google Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, Anne. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic, 2000.Google Scholar
Elizabeth, Freeman. “Packing History, Count(er)ing Generations.” New Literary History 31 (2000): 727–44.Google Scholar
Gillis, Stacy, Howie, Gillian, and Munford, Rebecca, eds. Third Wave Feminism: A Critical Exploration. London: Palgrave, 2004.10.1057/9780230523173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodstein, Elizabeth S. Experience without Qualities: Boredom and Modernity. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2005.Google Scholar
Vivian, Gornick. Approaching Eye Level. Boston: Beacon, 1996.Google Scholar
Elizabeth, Grosz. The Nick of Time: Politics, Evolution, and the Untimely. Durham: Duke UP, 2004.Google Scholar
Elizabeth, Grosz. Time Travels: Feminism, Nature, Power. Durham: Duke UP, 2005.Google Scholar
Donna, Haraway. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Donna, Haraway. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Astrid, Henry. Not My Mother's Sister: Generational Conflict and Third-Wave Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2004.Google Scholar
Heywood, Leslie, and Drake, Jennifer, eds. Third Wave Agenda: Being Feminist, Doing Feminism. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1997.Google Scholar
Looser, Devoney, and Kaplan, E. Ann, eds. Generations: Academic Feminists in Dialogue. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1997.Google Scholar
Mann, Susan Archer, and Douglas, J. Huffman. “The Decentering of Second Wave Feminism and the Rise of the Third Wave.” Science and Society 69 (2005): 5691.10.1521/siso. Scholar
Mardorossian, Carine M.Toward a New Feminist Theory of Rape.” Signs 27 (2002): 743–75.10.1086/337938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biddy, Martin. “Success and Its Failures.” Feminist Consequences. Ed. Bronfen, Elizabeth and Kavka, Misha. New York: Columbia UP, 2001. 353–80.Google Scholar
Messer-Davidow, Ellen. Disciplining Feminism: From Social Activism to Academic Discourse. Durham: Duke UP, 2002.10.1215/9780822383581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linda, Nicholson. Feminism/Postmodernism. New York: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
Adam, Phillips. On Kissing, Tickling, and Being Bored: Psychoanalytic Essays on the Unexamined Life. London: Faber, 1993.Google Scholar
Spacks, Patricia Meyer. Boredom: The Literary History of a State of Mind. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1997.Google Scholar
Lars, Svendsen. A Philosophy of Boredom. Trans. John Irons. London: Reaktion, 2005.Google Scholar
Rebecca, Walker, ed. To Be Real: Telling the Truth and Changing the Face of Feminism. New York: Anchor, 1995.Google Scholar
Nancy, Whittier. Feminist Generations: The Persistence of the Radical Women's Movement. Philadelphia: Temple UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Elizabeth, Wilson. Psychosomatic: Feminism and the Neurological Body. Durham: Duke UP, 2004.Google Scholar
Linda, Zerilli. Feminism and the Abyss of Freedom. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2005.Google Scholar