Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T22:24:47.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inscape and Instress: Further Analogies with Scotus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

Marjorie D. Coogan*
Affiliation:
Brooklyn College Brooklyn 10, N. Y.

Extract

At the risk of setting up further waves of what Joyce calls the “true scholastic stink” I feel it necessary to add a few more observations to the many already made on the philosophic clarifications of his own aesthetic position that Gerard Manley Hopkins found in Duns Scotus. The attention of critics is becoming more and more absorbed in studying the poetic process itself, the poet's perception of complexity and coherence, and his attempt to express them in terms of aesthetic structure. For such a study Hopkins offers rich materials. His own critical acumen forced him early to coin new terms, “inscape” and “instress”, in order to express more accurately the nature of poetic insight and response. It is apparent, therefore, that the more we can find out about inscape and instress, the more fully we shall grasp the nature of Hopkins' poetic experience, and ultimately the quality of the poems to which it gave rise. It is this purpose which justifies further explorations into fourteenth-century philosophic subtleties.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gerard Manley Hopkins (Oxford Univ. Press, 1948).

2 G. F. Lahey, S.J., The Life of Father Gerard Manley Hopkins (Oxford Univ. Press, 1930), p. 129.

3 “Hopkins and Duns Scotus”, New Verse, xIv (1935), 13–14.

4 Gerard Manley Hopkins (Martin Seeker and Warbury, 1944), i, 22–28.

5 “Instress of Inscape”, Gerard Manley Hopkins, Kenyon Critics (New Directions Press, 1945), p. 77.