Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-gctlb Total loading time: 0.321 Render date: 2022-07-05T22:42:50.405Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Article contents

The New Unhistoricism in Queer Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Abstract

In the name of “homohistory,” “queer temporality,” and “unhistoricism,” some early modernists have accused queer historicists of promoting a normalizing view of sexuality, history, and time. These early modernists announce their critique of the “straight temporality” allegedly caused by a framework of teleology as a decisive break from previous methods of queer history. Using the accusation of teleology as an analytic fulcrum, this essay scrutinizes these scholars' assumptions regarding temporality, representation, periodization, empiricism, and historical change. Ascertaining the conceptual work that the allegation of teleology performs, I reconsider the meanings and uses of the concept queer, as well as homo and hetero, in the context of historical inquiry. I also assess some of the affordances of psychoanalysis and deconstruction for the history of sexuality. At stake are not only our emerging understandings of the relations between chronology and teleology, sequence and consequence, but also some of the fundamental purposes and destinations of queering.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderson, David. “Queer Cosmopolitanism: Place, Politics, Citizenship and Queer as Folk.” New Formations 55 (2005): 7388. Print.Google Scholar
Alexander, M. Jacqui. Pedagogies of Crossing: Meditations on Feminism, Sexual Politics, Memory, and the Sacred. Durham: Duke UP, 2005. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arondekar, Anjali. “Time's Corpus: On Sexuality, Historiography, and the Indian Penal Code.” Hayes, Higonnet, and Spurlin 113-28.Google Scholar
Babayan, Kathryn, and Najmabadi, Asfaneh, eds. Islamicate Sexualities. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Bersani, Leo. Homos. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Blackbourn, David. “‘The Horologe of Time’: Periodization in History.” PMLA 127.2 (2012): 301–07. Print.Google Scholar
Bredbeck, Gregory. Sodomy and Interpretation: Marlowe to Milton. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Burger, Glenn, and Kruger, Steven F. Introduction. Queering the Middle Ages. Ed. Burger, and Kruger, . Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2001. xi-xxiii. Print.Google Scholar
Clark, Anna. Desire: A History of European Sexuality. New York: Routledge, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Cuncun, Wu. Homoerotic Sensibilities in Late Imperial China. London: Routledge, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Davis, Kathleen. Periodization and Sovereignty: How Ideas of Feudalism and Secularization Govern the Politics of Time. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 2008. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiGangi, Mario. “Queer Theory, Historicism, and Early Modern Sexualities.” Rev. of Queer/Early/Modern, by Carla Freccero, Before Intimacy: Asocial Sexuality in Early Modern England, by Daniel Juan Gil, Incest and Agency in Elizabeth's England, by Maureen Quilligan, and Constructions of Female Homoeroticism in Early Modern Drama, by Denise A. Walen. Criticism 48.1 (2006): 129–42. Print.Google Scholar
Dinshaw, Carolyn. Getting Medieval: Sexualities and Communities, Pre- and Postmodern. Durham: Duke UP, 1999. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinshaw, Carolyn, and Lochrie, Karma. Letter. PMLA 121.3 (2006): 837–38. Print.Google Scholar
Doan, Laura. Disturbing Practices: History, Sexuality, and Women's Experience of Modern War. Chicago: U of Chicago P, forthcoming. Print.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lee. Homographesis: Essays in Gay Literary and Cultural Theory. London: Routledge, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lee. No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham: Duke UP, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Eisner, Martin G., and Schachter, Marc D.Libido Sciendi: Apuleius, Boccaccio, and the Study of the History of Sexuality.” PMLA 124.3 (2009): 817–37. Print.Google Scholar
Epstein, Steven. “Thinking Sex Ethnographically.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 17.1 (2011): 8595. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabian, Johannes. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. New York: Columbia UP, 1983. Print.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1. New York: Random, 1976. Print.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Random, 1971. Print.Google Scholar
Freccero, Carla. “Figural Historiography: Dogs, Humans, and Cyanthropic Becomings.” Hayes, Higonnet, and Spurlin 45-67.Google Scholar
Freccero, Carla. Queer/Early/Modern. Durham: Duke UP, 2006. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freccero, Carla. “Queer Spectrality: Haunting the Past.” A Companion to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Studies. Ed. Haggerty, George E. and McGarry, Molly. Malden: Blackwell, 2007. 194213. Print.Google Scholar
Freccero, Carla. “The Queer Time of the Lesbian Premodern.” The Lesbian Premodern. Ed. Giffney, Noreen, Sauer, Michelle M., and Watt, Diane. New York: Palgrave, 2011. 6173. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freccero, Carla. “Queer Times.” South Atlantic Quarterly 106.3 (2007): 485–94. Print.Google Scholar
Freccero, Carla, and Fradenburg, Louise. Premodern Sexualities. London: Routledge, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Freeman, Elizabeth. “Theorizing Queer Temporalities: A Roundtable Discussion.” Queer Temporalities. Ed. Freeman. Spec. issue of GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 13.2-3 (2007): 177–95. Print.Google Scholar
Freeman, Elizabeth. Time Binds: Queer Temporalities, Queer Histories. Durham: Duke UP, 2010. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil, Daniel Juan. Before Intimacy: Asocial Sexuality in Early Modern England. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Jonathan. “After Thoughts.” South Atlantic Quarterly 106.3 (2007): 501–10. Print.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Jonathan. “The History That Will Be.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 1.4 (1995): 385403. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Jonathan. Introduction. Queering the Renaissance. Ed. Goldberg, . Durham: Duke UP, 1994. 114. Print.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Jonathan. “Margaret Cavendish, Scribe.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 10.3 (2004): 433–52. Print.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Jonathan. The Seeds of Things: Theorizing Sexuality and Materiality in Renaissance Representations. New York: Fordham UP, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Jonathan. Sodometries: Renaissance Texts, Modern Sexualities. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1992. Print.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Jonathan, and Menon, Madhavi. “Queering History.” PMLA 120.5 (2005): 1608–17. Print.Google Scholar
Gopinah, Gayatri. Impossible Desires: Queer Diasporas and South Asian Public Cultures. Durham: Duke UP, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. The Nick of Time: Politics, Evolution, and the Untimely. Durham: Duke UP, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Haber, Judith. Desire and Dramatic Form in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Halberstam, Judith. In a Queer Time and Place: Trans-gender Bodies, Subcultural Lives. New York: New York UP, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Halley, Janet, and Parker, Andrew, eds. After Sex? On Writing since Queer Theory. Spec. issue of South Atlantic Quarterly 106.3 (2007): 421646. Print.Google Scholar
Halperin, David M. How to Do the History of Homosexuality. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Hammill, Graham. Sexuality and Form: Caravaggio, Marlowe, and Bacon. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Harris, Jonathan Gil. “Untimely Meditations.” Timely Meditations. Spec. issue of Early Modern Culture: An Electronic Seminar 6 (2007): n. pag. Web. 2007.Google Scholar
Hayes, Jarrod, Higonnet, Margaret, and Spurlin, William J., eds. Comparatively Queer: Crossing Time, Crossing Cultures. New York: Palgrave, 2010. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzog, Dagmar. “Syncopated Sex: Transforming European Sexual Cultures.” American Historical Review 114.5 (2009): 1287–308. Print.Google Scholar
Hunt, Lynn. Measuring Time, Making History. Budapest: Central European UP, 2008. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagose, Annamarie. “Feminism's Queer Theory.” Feminism and Psychology 19.2 (2009): 157–74. Print.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, Elaine. Sex and Sexuality in China. London: Routledge, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Lanham, Richard A. A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms. 2nd ed. Berkeley: U of California P, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Lanser, Susan. “Mapping Sapphic Modernity.” Hayes, Higonnet, and Spurlin 69-89.Google Scholar
Lanser, Susan. “The Political Economy of Same-Sex Desire.” Structures and Subjectivities: Attending to Early Modern Women. Ed. Hartman, Joan E. and Seeff, Adele. Newark: U of Delaware P, 2006. 157–75. Print.Google Scholar
Lanser, Susan. “The Sexuality of History: Sapphic Subjects and the Making of Modernity.” N.d. TS.Google Scholar
Lochrie, Karma. Heterosynchrasies: Female Sexuality When Normal Wasn't. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Love, Heather. Feeling Backward: Loss and the Politics of Queer History. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Manalansan, Martin F.In the Shadows of Stonewall: Examining Gay Transnational Politics and the Diasporic Dilemma.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 2.4 (1995): 425–38. Print.Google Scholar
Menon, Madhavi. “Period Cramps.” Afterword. Nardizzi, Guy-Bray, and Stockton, Queer Renaissance Historiography 229-35.Google Scholar
Menon, Madhavi. Reply to letter of Carolyn Dinshaw and Karma Lochrie. PMLA 121.3 (2006): 838–39. Print.Google Scholar
Menon, Madhavi. “Spurning Teleology in Venus and Adonis.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 11.4 (2005): 491519. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menon, Madhavi. Unhistorical Shakespeare: Queer Theory in Shakespearean Literature and Film. New York: Palgrave, 2008. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menon, Madhavi. Wanton Words: Rhetoric and Sexuality in English Renaissance Drama. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Muñoz, José Esteban. Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity. New York: New York UP, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Nardizzi, Vin, Guy-Bray, Stephen, and Stockton, Will. “Queer Renaissance Historiography: Backward Gaze.” Nardizzi, Guy-Bray, and Stockton, Queer Renaissance Historiography 1-12.Google Scholar
Nardizzi, Vin, eds. Queer Renaissance Historiography: Backward Gaze. Farnham: Ashgate, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Paur, Jasbir Kaur. “Circuits of Queer Mobility: Tourism, Travel, and Globalization.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 8.1-2 (2002): 101–37. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puff, Helmut. “After the History of (Male) Homosexuality.” After the History of Sexuality: German Genealogies with and beyond Foucault. Ed. Scott Spector, Puff, and Herzog, Dagmar. New York: Berghahn, 2012. 1730. Print.Google Scholar
Radel, Nicholas F. Rev. of Queer Renaissance Historiography: Backward Gaze, ed. Vin Nardizzi, Stephen Guy-Bray, and Will Stockton. Renaissance Quarterly 63.3 (2010): 996–98. Print.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. “Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence.” Signs: A Journal of Women in Culture and Society 5.4 (1980): 631–60. Print.Google Scholar
Rofel, Lisa. Desiring China: Experiments in Neoliberalism, Sexuality, and Public Culture. Durham: Duke UP, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Rohy, Valerie. Anachronism and Its Others: Sexuality, Race, Temporality. Albany: State U of New York P, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Rubin, Gayle. “Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality.” Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality. Ed. Vance, Carole S. London: Routledge, 1984. 267319. Print.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Melissa E. Erotic Subjects: The Sexuality of Politics in Early Modern English Literature. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2011. Print.Google Scholar
Sang, Tze-lan D. The Emerging Lesbian: Female Same-Sex Desire in Modern China. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley: U of California P, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Tendencies. Durham: Duke UP, 1993. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See, Sam. “Richard Barnfield and the Limits of Homo-erotic Literary History.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 13.1 (2007): 6391. Print.Google Scholar
Stockton, Kathryn Bond. The Queer Child; or, Growing Sideways in the Twentieth Century. Durham: Duke UP, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Stockton, Will. “How to Do the History of Heterosexuality: Shakespeare and Lacan.” Literature Compass 7.4 (2010): 254–65. Print.Google Scholar
Stockton, Will. Playing Dirty: Sexuality and Waste in Early Modern Comedy. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2011. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockton, Will. “Shakespeare and Queer Theory.” Rev. of Shakesqueer: A Queer Companion to the Complete Works of Shakespeare, ed. Madhavi Menon. Shakespeare Quarterly 63.2 (2012): 224–35. Print.Google Scholar
Traub, Valerie. “The Joys of Martha Joyless: Queer Pedagogy and the (Early Modern) Production of Sexual Knowledge.” The Forms of Renaissance Thought: New Essays in Literature and Culture. Ed. Barkan, Leonard, Cormack, Bradin, and Keilen, Sean. New York: Palgrave, 2008. 170–98. Print.Google Scholar
Traub, Valerie. “Making Sexual Knowledge.” Early Modern Women: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5 (2010): 251–59. Print.Google Scholar
Traub, Valerie. “The Present Future of Lesbian Historiography.” A Companion to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Studies. Ed. Haggerty, George and McGarry, Molly. London: Blackwell, 2007. 124–45. Print.Google Scholar
Wah-shan, Chou. Tongzhi: Politics of Same-Sex Eroticism in Chinese Societies. London: Routledge, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1973. Print.Google Scholar
Wiegman, Robyn. Object Lessons. Durham: Duke UP, 2012. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The New Unhistoricism in Queer Studies
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The New Unhistoricism in Queer Studies
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The New Unhistoricism in Queer Studies
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *