Hostname: page-component-7dc689bd49-sqk25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-20T10:38:21.107Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Of Pigs and Parchment: Medieval Studies and the Coming of the Animal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

For Jorge Luis Borges, local color was overrated. In “the argentine writer and tradition” (1951), borges responded to the charges of critics who valued indigenous traditions and themes above all else; for Borges, just as Shakespeare could draw on Scandinavian history and Racine from the memories of the ancient world, so the Argentine writer should be permitted to mine the veins of the Western European tradition for the rich ore of literary art (Frisch 43). When the national writer does wish to produce a “truly native” text, he suggests, this should be accomplished with great subtlety, even to the extent of obscuring altogether the indigenous hues of local color in favor of an unspoken affiliation with the authorial homeland. A prime example of this technique, he avows, can be found in the Koran:

A few days ago, I discovered a curious confirmation of the way in which what is truly native can and often does dispense with local color; I found this confirmation in Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. Gibbon observes that in the Arab book par excellence, the Koran, there are no camels; I believe that if there ever were any doubt as to the authenticity of the Koran, this lack of camels would suffice to prove that it is Arab. It was written by Mohammed, and Mohammed, as an Arab, had no reason to know that camels were particularly Arab; they were, for him, a part of reality, and he had no reason to single them out, while the first thing a forger, a tourist, or an Arab nationalist would do is bring on the camels, whole caravans of camels on every page; but Mohammed, as an Arab, was unconcerned; he knew he could be Arab without camels. I believe that we Argentines can be like Mohammed; we can believe in the possibility of being Argentine without abounding in local color. (181)

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Ian, Almond. “Borges the Post-orientalist: Images of Islam from the Edge of the West.” MFS: Modern Fiction Studies 50.2 (2004): 435–59. Print.Google Scholar
Piers, Beirne. “The Law Is an Ass: Reading E. P. Evans' The Medieval Prosecution and Capital Punishment of Animals.” Society and Animals 2.1 (1994): 2746. Print.Google Scholar
Paul, Berman. “An Anthropological Approach to Modern Forfeiture Law: The Symbolic Function of Legal Actions against Objects.” Yale Journal of Law and Humanities 11.1 (1999). Print.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Bischoff. Latin Palaeography: Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Trans. Dáibhí Ó Cróinín and David Ganz. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Borges, Jorge Luis. “The Argentine Writer and Tradition.” Labyrinths: Selected Stories and Other Writings. Trans. Donald A. Yates. New York: New Directions, 1964. 177–85. Print.Google Scholar
Mary, Carruthers. The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1992. Print.Google Scholar
Esther, Cohen. The Crossroads of Justice: Law and Culture in Late Medieval France. Leiden: Brill, 1992. Print.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome. Medieval Identity Machines. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Rita, Copeland. Response. Beast and Bestiality. MLA Annual Convention. Sheraton New York, New York. 29 Dec. 2002. Address.Google Scholar
Susan, Crane. “For the Birds.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 29 (2007): 2341. Print.Google Scholar
Robert, Darnton. “Workers Revolt: The Great Cat Massacre of the Rue Saint-Séverin.” The Great Cat Massacre and Other Episodes in French Cultural History. New York: Vintage, 1985. 75106. Print.Google Scholar
de Hamel, Christopher. Scribes and Illuminators. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1992. Print.Google Scholar
Carolyn, Dinshaw. Chaucer's Sexual Poetics. Madison: U of Chicago P, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Jody, Enders. “Homicidal Pigs and the Anti-Semitic Imagination.” Exemplaria 14.1 (2002): 201–38. Print.Google Scholar
William, Ewald. “Comparative Jurisprudence (I): What Was It Like to Try a Rat?University of Pennsylvania Law Review 143.6 (1995): 18892149. Print.Google Scholar
Fabre-Vassas, Claudine. The Singular Beast: Jews, Christians, and the Pig. Trans. Carol Volk. New York: Columbia UP, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
Luc, Ferry. The New Ecological Order. Trans. Carol Volk. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Gary, Francione. Animals, Property, and the Law. Philadelphia: Temple UP, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Frisch, Mark S. You Might Be Able to Get There from Here: Reconsidering Borges and the Postmodern. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson UP, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Robert, Meinert, Christiane, and Schrempf, Johannes, eds. Pergament: Geschichte, Material, Konservierung, Restaurierung. Munich: Siegl, 2001. Print. Kölner Beiträge zur Restaurierung und Konservierung von Kunst- und Kulturgut 12.Google Scholar
Ralph, Hanna. “Middle English Books and Middle English Literary History.” Modern Philology 102.2 (2004): 157–78. Print.Google Scholar
Bruce, Holsinger. Music, Body, and Desire in Medieval Culture: Hildegard of Bingen to Chaucer. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
C., Horstman, ed. Yorkshire Writers: Richard Rolle of Hampole, an English Father of the Church, and His Followers. 2 vols. London: Sonnenschein, 1895–96. Print.Google Scholar
Howe, C. J., et al. “Manuscript Evolution.” Trends in Genetics 17.3 (2001): 147–52. Print.Google Scholar
Eric, Jager. “The Book of the Heart: Reading and Writing the Medieval Subject.” Speculum 71.1 (1996): 126. Print.Google Scholar
Lisa, Kiser. “Animals in Medieval Sports, Entertainment, and Menageries.” Resl, Cultural History 103–26.Google Scholar
Leach, Elizabeth Eva. Sung Birds: Music, Nature, and Poetry in the Later Middle Ages. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Aleksander, Pluskowski, ed. Breaking and Shaping Beastly Bodies: Animals as Material Culture in the Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxbow, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Brigitte, Resl. “Beyond the Ark: Animals in Medieval Art.” Resl, Cultural History 179201.Google Scholar
Brigitte, Resl, ed. A Cultural History of Animals in the Medieval Age. Oxford: Berg, 2007. Print. Vol. 2 of A Cultural History of Animals. Linda Kalof and Resl, gen. eds. 6 vols. 2007.Google Scholar
Kathleen, Ryan. “Parchment as Faunal Record.” MASCA: University of Pennsylvania Journal 4.3 (1987): 124–38. Print.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Joyce E. The Beast Within: Animals in the Middle Ages. New York: Routledge, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Krish, Seetah. “The Middle Ages on the Block: Animals, Guilds, and Meat in the Medieval Period.” Pluskowski 1831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karl, Steel. “How to Make a Human.” Exemplaria 20.1 (2008): 327. Print.Google Scholar
Timothy, Stinson. Letter to the author. 5 Aug. 2008. MS.Google Scholar
Naomi, Sykes. “Taking Sides: The Social Life of Venison in Medieval England.” Pluskowski 149–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Craig, ed. and trans. The Old English Riddles of the Exeter Book. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1977. Print.Google Scholar
Wise, Steven M. Rattling the Cage: Toward Legal Rights for Animals. Cambridge: Da Capo, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Dorothy, Yamamoto. The Boundaries of the Human in Medieval English Literature. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Lisa, Yeomans. “The Shifting Use of Animal Carcasses in Medieval and Post-medieval London.” Pluskowski 98115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar