Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T08:52:52.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surprise Me If You Can

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

Hey! Whatcha readin' for?

—Bill Hicks, comedian, Sane Man (1989)

Miller Reads So the Chinese (and Young, Western Computer Gamers) Don't Have To

In August 2010, I Attended a Lecture that J. Hillis Miller Gave at the Shanghai jiao Tong University on the Challenge of Reading world literature. The lecture argued that in a globalizing world, traveling literature grows distant from its linguistic milieu, local readership, and aesthetic context, making it our challenge to find a reading method that could safeguard these endangered aspects of the text's specificity. To do this, he proposed to imagine himself as a Chinese anthologist who, wishing to include a translation of William Butler Yeats's poem “The Cold Heaven” in a Chinese anthology of world literature, must ask himself, “Just what would I need to tell Chinese readers to make them the best possible readers of this poem?” Miller concluded that, as that anthologist, he would need to give them the facts about Yeats's life and works, an account of the generic rules of the poem's verse form, a note on the broad recurrence of “sudden” and “suddenly” in Yeats's oeuvre, information about “[w]hat sort of bird the rook is and why they are delighted by cold weather,” a clarification of the differing connotations of “heaven” and “skies” for Christian readers familiar with “The Lord's Prayer,” an explanation of what the oxymoron “burning ice” has meant in the Western poetic tradition, a pointer to the allusion in the word “crossed” to Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, and some sense of the embedded subtext of Yeats's failure to woo Maud Gonne (256). For, according to Miller (citing David Damrosch), when culturally distant readers are not made aware of the “vast substratum beneath” a poem, they are “likely to impose domestic literary values on the foreign work” (254). In short, a respectful reading method must ensure that such readers are guided through the text, in the light of its original context.

Type
theories and methodologies
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Abrams, M. H.The Deconstructive Angel.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 3, no. 3, Spring 1977, pp. 425–38.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. S/Z: An Essay. Translated by Richard Miller, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1974.Google Scholar
Bhabha, Homi. The Location of Culture. Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
Bogel, Fredric. “Toward a New Formalism: The Intrinsic and Related Problems in Criticism and Theory.” New Formalisms and Literary Theory, edited by Theile, Verena and Tredennick, Linda, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, pp. 2953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, Wayne. “‘Preserving the Exemplar’; or, How Not to Dig Our Own Graves.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 3, no. 3, Spring 1977, pp. 407–23.Google Scholar
CNN Democratic Presidential Debate. CNN, 6 Mar. 2016, Flint, Michigan.Google Scholar
Detienne, Marcel. Comparing the Incomparable. Translated by Lloyd, Janet, Stanford UP, 2008.Google Scholar
Felski, Rita. “Digging Down and Standing Back.” English Language Notes, vol. 51, no. 2, Fall-Winter 2013, pp. 723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felski, Rita. “Latour and Literary Studies.” PMLA, vol. 130, no. 3, May 2015, pp. 737–42.Google Scholar
Felski, Rita. The Limits of Critique. U of Chicago P, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felski, Rita. Uses of Literature. Blackwell Publishing, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felski, Rita, and Friedman, Susan Stanford, editors. Comparison: Theories, Approaches, Uses. Johns Hopkins UP, 2013.Google Scholar
Friedman, Susan Stanford. “Why Not Compare?” Felski and Friedman, pp. 3445.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. Translated by Weinsheimer, Joel and Marshall, Donald G, Continuum Publishing, 1975.Google Scholar
Halberstam, J. Jack. “Straight Eye for the Queer Theorist—a Review of ‘Queer Theory without Antinormativity’ by Jack Halberstam.” Bully Bloggers, 12 Sept. 2015, bullybloggers.wordpress.com/2015/09/12/straight-eye-for-the-queer-theorist-a-review-of-queer-theory-without-antinormativity-by-jack-halberstam/.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. D. Validity in Interpretation. Yale UP, 1967.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford UP, 2005.Google Scholar
Levine, Caroline. Forms: Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network. Princeton UP, 2015.Google Scholar
Love, Heather. “Close but Not Deep: Literary Ethics and the Descriptive Turn.” New Literary History, vol. 41, no. 2, Spring 2010, pp. 371–91.Google Scholar
Marcus, Sharon, and Best, Stephen. “Surface Reading: An Introduction.” Representations, vol. 108, no. 1, Fall 2009, pp. 121.Google Scholar
Mignolo, Walter. “On Comparison: Who Is Comparing What and Why?” Felski and Friedman, pp. 99119.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis. “Globalization and World Literature.” Neohelicon, vol. 38, no. 2, Dec. 2011, pp. 251–65.Google Scholar
Nathanson, Donald L.Affect Imagery Consciousness.” Prologue. Tomkins, pp. xi-xxviii.Google Scholar
Radhakrishnan, R.Why Compare?” Felski and Friedman, pp. 1533.Google Scholar
Rooney, Ellen. “Live Free or Describe: The Reading Effect and the Persistence of Form.” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, vol. 21, no. 3, 2010, pp. 112–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. “Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading; or, You're So Paranoid, You Probably Think This Introduction Is about You.” Novel Gazing: Queer Readings in Fiction, edited by Sedgwick, , Duke UP, 1997, pp. 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. “The Weather in Proust.” The Weather in Proust, edited by Goldberg, Jonathan, Duke UP, 2011, pp. 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. “Part II: Quentin Skinner on Interpretation.” Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics, edited by Tully, James, Princeton UP, 1988, pp. 29132.Google Scholar
Sommer, Doris. Proceed with Caution When Engaged by Minority Writing in the Americas. Harvard UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Stockton, Kathryn Bond. “Reading as Kissing, Sex with Ideas: ‘Lesbian’ Barebacking?Los Angeles Review of Books, 8 Mar. 2015, lareviewofbooks.org/article/reading-kissing-sex-ideas-lesbian-barebacking/.Google Scholar
Tomkins, Silvan S. Affect Imagery Consciousness: The Complete Edition. Springer Publishing, 2008.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Johns Hopkins UP, 1987.Google Scholar