Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T15:01:28.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Embarrassment and the Forms of Redemption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

Homosexuality is the truth of love.

—Gilles Deleuze, Proust and Signs

No one wants to be called a homosexual.

—Leo Bersani, Homos

The Tension Between My Epigraphs' Formulations Might be Taken as The Animating Energy of Queer Theory. If the first provides queers with a vision of our sexuality as flatteringly significant, the second insists with punishing concision that this significance resists translation into social equality. More precisely, the two statements could be seen as mutually constitutive: it is the social abjection of the sexually deviant that makes our sexuality interesting, as it is the excessive symbolic interest of our difference that has made us socially volatile. Or at least this has been one guiding assumption of queer theory, which has leveraged some of its most imaginative work by arrogating to queerness a symbolic centrality out of all proportion to queers' acknowledged numbers or to our social power. It is no accident that Leo Bersani articulates the unpleasant reality principle in this little epigraphic debate. His writing is justly famous for its suspicion of the rhetoric of identitarian dignity and for its refusal of conceptual consolations of all kinds; Bersani's habit of accentuating the negative made his work the inevitable reference point for PMLA's May 2006 Forum on the “antisocial thesis” in queer theory (Caserio et al.). And yet for all Bersani's insistence on exposing the fantasies of transcendence undergirding our culture and our criticism, his writing is perhaps even more remarkable for the way it has managed to combine that scouring sensibility with a sense of ethical and political promise. Refusing the culture of redemption won't, of course, quite save you. But Bersani's work has always suggested that it could be beneficent (a favorite word of his).

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Bersani, Leo. The Culture of Redemption. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Bersani, Leo. “Father Knows Best.” Rethinking Sex: Gender and Sexuality Studies State of the Field Conf. U of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 5 Mar. 2009. Address.Google Scholar
Bersani, Leo. A Future for Astyanax: Character and Desire in Literature. New York: Columbia UP, 1976. Print.Google Scholar
Bersani, Leo. Homos. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Bersani, Leo. “Is the Rectum a Grave?October 43 (1987): 197222. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bersani, Leo, Dean, Tim, Foster, Hal, and Silverman, Kaja. “A Conversation with Leo Bersani.” October 82 (1997): 316. Print.Google Scholar
Bersani, Leo, and Dutoit, Ulysse. Arts of Impoverishment: Beckett, Rothko, Resnais. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Bersani, Leo. Caravaggio. London: British Film Inst., 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Bersani, Leo. Caravaggio's Secrets. Cambridge: MIT P, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Bersani, Leo. Forms of Being: Cinema, Aesthetics, Subjectivity. London: British Film Inst., 2004. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bersani, Leo, and Phillips, Adam. Intimacies. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2008. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caserio, Robert L., et al. “The Antisocial Thesis in Queer Theory.” PMLA 121.3 (2006): 819–28. Print.Google Scholar
Dean, Tim. Unlimited Intimacy: Reflections on the Culture of Barebacking. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2009. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. Proust and Signs: The Complete Text. Trans. Howard, Richard. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Halperin, David. What Do Gay Men Want? An Essay on Sex, Risk, and Subjectivity. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2007. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley: U of California P, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Warner, Michael. Introduction. Fear of a Queer Planet. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1993. vii-xxi. Print.Google Scholar