Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T08:06:43.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epitaphic Nation: The Problem of the South and Necropolitics in Early Modern Vietnamese National Literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

Whoever goes down to Bà Ria and happens by the cemetery in the sand at the village of Phu'ó'c Lě, I beg you to go in that cemetery and look for the grave with a cross painted half black, half white, by the side of the Church of Martyrs–to visit that grave lest it become pitiful. Because it has been two years since anyone visited or cast as much as a glance.

—Nguyễn Trong Quan

SO opens nguyễn trọng quản's thẩy lazaro phiển (“lazaro phiển” 22). The narrative begins at an obscure gravesite evokes the life of a man as both victim of state violence and perpetrator of private deaths. Lazaro Phiển is a ictional work written in the romanized script and was published in Saigon in 1887 in a novelistic format almost forty years before Hoàng Ngọc Phách's Tố Tâm. Yet the latter, published in Hanoi in 1925, is oten touted in official literary history as the first modern Vietnamese novel. Although Nguyễn Trọng Qu.n's narrative revolves around the recovery of an elided story, the author could not have anticipated the elision of his work from a nationalist literary genealogy that locates the origin of modern Vietnamese literature in the North. he elision was part of a general omission of works from the South in the last decades of the nineteenth century and irst two decades of the twentieth. his genealogy was by no means limited to the Democratic Republic of Vietnam in the North but was also perpetuated in the Republic of Vietnam in the South ater independence and the partitioning of the country into North and South in 1954

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Agamben, Giorgio. Stanzas: Word and Phantasm in Western Culture. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities. 2nd ed. New York: Verso, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Cheah, Pheng. Spectral Nationality: Passages of Freedom from Kant to Postcolonial Literatures of Liberation. New York: Columbia UP, 2003. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. Trans. Kamuf, Peggy. New York: Routledge, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Hàm, Dương Quảng. Việt Nam văn học sử yếu [Brief History of Vietnamese Literature]. Hochiminh City: Nhà Xuất Bản Trẻ, 2005. PrintGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. An Introduction. Trans. Hurley, Robert. New York: Random, 1990. Print. Vol. 1 of The History of Sexuality.Google Scholar
Malkki, Liisa. “Refugees and Exile”. Annual Review of Anthropology 24 (1995): 495523. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl. Capital. vol. 1. The Marx-Engels Reader. Ed. Tucker, Robert C. New York: Norton, 1978. 294–442. Print.Google Scholar
Mills-Courts, Karen. Poetry as Epitaph: Representation and Poetic Language. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Thắng, Nguyễn Q. “Khái quát về tính đặc thù của văn học Việt Nam nơi miền đất mới” [Generalizations about the Particularistic Character of Vietnamese Literature in the New Land]. Văn học Việt Nam nơi miền đất mới [Vietnamese Literature in the New Land]. Vol. 1. Hanoi: Văn Học, 2007. 11–29. Print.Google Scholar
Quản, Nguyễn Trọng. Thầy Lazaro Phiền. Saigon: J. Linage, 1887. Rpt. in. Văn xuôi lãng mạn Việt Nam 1887–2000 [Vietnamese Romantic Prose]. Vol. 1 (1887–1932). Hochiminh City: Nhà Xuất Bản Thành Phố Hồ Chí Minh/Văn Hóa Sài Gòn, 2005. 22–44. Print.Google Scholar
Trung, Nguyễn Văn. “Một mảng văn học bị bỏ quên, bỏ qua” [A Forgotten Piece of Literature]. Lục Châu học [Lục Châu Studies]. New Viet Art, 30 June 2009. Web. 14 Apr. 2010.Google Scholar
Đệ, Phan Cự. “Những khuynh hướng tiểu thuyết trước Năm 1930 và những mầm mống đầu tiên của nền tiểu tuyết mới” [Fictional Trends before 1930 and the First Seeds of the New Novel]. Phan Cự Đệ tuyển tập [Phan Cự Đệ: Selected Works]. Vol. 2. Hanoi: Nhà Xuất Bản Giáo dục, 2006. 9–38. Print.Google Scholar
Đệ, Phan Cự. “Quá trình hình thành và phát triển của nền văn học Việt Nam hiện đại” [The Formation and Development of Modern Vietnamese Literature]. Phan Cự Đệ tuyển tập [Phan Cự Đệ: Selected Works]. Vol. 1. Hanoi: Nhà Xuất Bản Giáo dục, 2006. 23–30. Print.Google Scholar
Đệ, Phan Cự“Trào lưu văn học lãng mạn chủ nghĩa” [The Literary Movement in Romanticism]. Phan Cự Đệ tuyển tập [Phan Cự Đệ: Selected Works]. Vol. 1. Hanoi: Nhà Xuất Bản Giáo dục, 2006. 31–63. Print.Google Scholar
Roasa, Dustin. “Vietnamese Dissidents: Absent from the Western Mind”. Dissent 57.3 (2010): 1621. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, John C., and Uyên, Thế. “The Novel Emerges in Cochinchina”. Journal of Asian Studies 52.4 (1993): 854–84. Print.Google Scholar
Shih, Shu-mei. “Global Literature and the Technologies of Recognition”. PMLA 119.1 (2004): 1630. Print.Google Scholar
Nhơn, Võ Văn. Văn học Quốc Ngữ trước 1945 ở thành phố Hồ Chí Minh [Literature in Quốc Ngữ before 1945 in Hồ Chí Minh City]. Hochiminh City: Nhà Xuất Bản Tổng Hợp TPHMC; Văn Hóa Sài Gòn, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Phan, Vũ Ngọc. Nhà văn hiện đại [Modern Writers]. Saigon: Nhà Xuất Bản Thăng Long, 1960. Print.Google Scholar