Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-887v8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-11T20:21:29.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experts and Encounters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2021

Robert Chodat
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 135 , Issue 5 , October 2020 , pp. 989 - 994
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Robert Chodat

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Ayer, A. J. Language, Truth, and Logic. 1936. Dover, 1952.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy. Oxford UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. Must We Mean What We Say? Cambridge UP, 1969.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. “Performative and Passionate Utterance.” Philosophy the Day after Tomorrow. Harvard UP, 2005, pp. 155–91.Google Scholar
Clune, Michael. “The Bizarro World of Literary Studies.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, 28 Oct. 2018, www.chronicle.com/article/The-Bizarro-World-of-Literary/244938.Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur C. The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art. Columbia UP, 1986.Google Scholar
Isenberg, Arnold. “Critical Communication.” The Philosophical Review. vol. 58, 1949, pp. 330–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramnick, Jonathan. “The Interdisciplinary Fallacy.” Representations. vol. 140, no. 1, Fall 2017, pp. 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moi, Toril. The Revolution of the Ordinary: Literary Studies after Wittgenstein, Austin, and Cavell. U of Chicago P, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar