Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T15:56:30.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Have Animals Souls?”: Theosophy and the Suffering Body

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

The normative understanding of “the clash of religions” assumes external conflict: we think, for example, of christianity's historical struggle with Islam; of the clash between Hinduism and Islam in the partition of the Indian subcontinent; or, in the field of empire, of the imperial contest over the souls and bodies of colonial subjects, in which material rationales for control and expropriation appear as theological motivations, rendering religious conversion virtually interchangeable with cultural conquest. Viewed in this light, the notion of a clash of religions bypasses conflicts internal to individual religions, which are equally if not more important in shaping the content of religious thought. Internal conflicts often play out as debates over the meanings of key concepts in the religions.

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Besant, Annie. An Autobiography. 1893. Madras: Theosophical, 1939. Print.Google Scholar
Besant, Annie. Pain: Its Meaning and Use. Madras: Theosophical, 1961. Print.Google Scholar
Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. “Absolute Monism; or, Mind Is Matter and Matter Is Mind: A Review.” Collected Writings, 1888. Madras: Theosophical, 1962. 1116. Print.Google Scholar
Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. “A Force of Prejudice.” Collected Writings, 1889. Madras: Theosophical, 1958. 330–40. Print.Google Scholar
Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. “Have Animals Souls?Collected Writings, 1886–87. Madras: Theosophical, 1958. 1249. Print.Google Scholar
Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. “Why Do Animals Suffer?Collected Writings, 1888. Madras: Theosophical, 1962. 286–88. Print.Google Scholar
Burfield, Diana. “Theosophy and Feminism: Some Explorations in Nineteenth-Century Biography.” Women's Religious Experience. Ed. Holden, Pat. London: Croom, 1983. 2756. Print.Google Scholar
Cousins, James H., and Cousins, Margaret. We Two Together. Madras: Ganesh, 1950. Print.Google Scholar
Elston, Mary Ann. “Women and Anti-vivisection in Victorian England, 1870–1900.” Vivisection in Historical Perspective. Ed. Rupke, Nicholaas. London: Croom, 1987. 259–94. Print.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Moira. Animal Advocacy and Englishwomen, 1780–1900. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1998. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, E. M. A Passage to India. 1924. New York: Harcourt, 1952. Print.Google Scholar
French, Richard D. Antivivisection and Medical Science in Victorian Society. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1975. Print.Google Scholar
Haeckel, Ernst. Eternity: World-War Thoughts on Life and Death, Religion, and the Theory of Evolution. New York: Truth Seeker, 1916. Print.Google Scholar
Kingsford, Anna. Dreams and Dream-Stories. 3rd ed. London: Watkins, 1908. Print.Google Scholar
Lansbury, Coral. The Old Brown Dog: Women, Workers, and Vivisection in Edwardian England. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1985. Print.Google Scholar
Maitland, Edward. Anna Kingsford: Her Life, Letters, Diary, and Work. 2 vols. London: Redway, 1896. Print.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Janet. The Other World: Spiritualism and Psychical Research in England, 1850–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1985. Print.Google Scholar
Richards, Evelleen. “Redrawing the Boundaries: Darwinian Science and Victorian Women Intellectuals.” Victorian Science in Context. Ed. Lightman, Bernard. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1997. 119–42. Print.Google Scholar
Taylor, Anne. Annie Besant: A Biography. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1992. Print.Google Scholar
Viswanathan, Gauri. Outside the Fold: Conversion, Modernity, and Belief. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Weir, Todd. “The Secular Beyond: Free Religious Dissent and Debates of the Afterlife in Nineteenth-Century Germany.” Church History 77.3 (2008): 629–58. Print.Google Scholar