Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-26T07:00:06.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Our Puny Boundaries: Why the Craving for Carving Up the Nineteenth Century?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

It's almost too convenient that carve evolves, via middle high german (kerben), from the greek graphein: “TO scratch, to write.” Ham-fisted or artful, the verb is the mark of desire, of a craving to inscribe. Given a century, carvings display cravings of the mind, motivated assignments in a march of years all beginning 18—. Figuring out how to carve one's shape in history, or how to carve history into shape, was a perplexity, a founding question even, at the dawn of the century:

      Who knows the individual hour in which
      His habits were first sown, even as a seed?
      [………]
      Hard task to analyse a soul in which
      Not only general habits and desires
      But each most obvious and particular thought,
      Not in a mystical and idle sense,
      But in the words of reason deeply weigh'd
      Hath no beginning.

Type
The Changing Profession
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Collingwood, R. G. The Idea of History. 1946. New York: Oxford UP, 1956.Google Scholar
Collins, Thomas J., and Rundle, Vivienne J., eds. The Broadview Anthology of Victorian Poetry and Poetic Theory. Peterborough, ON: Broadview. 1999.Google Scholar
Collins, Thomas J., and Rundle, Vivienne J. Editorial Preface. Collins and Rundle, Broadview Anthology v-vi.Google Scholar
Curran, Stuart. “Chronology.” The Cambridge Companion to British Romanticism. Ed. Curran, . Cambridge: Cambridge UP. 1993.271–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Man, Paul. “Literary History and Literary Modernity.” 1969. Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. 1971. 2nd ed. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1983. 142–65.Google Scholar
The English Romantic Poets: A Review of Research and Criticism. 4th ed. Ed. Jordan, Frank. New York: MLA, 1985.Google Scholar
The English Romantic Poets and Essayists: A Review of Research and Criticism. Ed. Houtchens, Carolyn Washburn and Houtchens, Lawrence Huston. Rev. ed. New York: MLA; New York UP, 1966.Google Scholar
Galperin, William H., and Wolfson, Susan J.A Case for The Romantic Century, 1750–1850.” “Romanticism in Crisis.” Convention of the North Amer. Soc. for the Study of Romanticism. 1997. Delivered by Galperin.Google Scholar
Jack, Ian. English Literature, 1815–1832. Oxford: Clarendon, 1963. Vol. 10 of Oxford History of English Literature.Google Scholar
Leighton, Angela, and Reynolds, Margaret. Preface. Leighton and Reynolds, Victorian Women Poets xxi.Google Scholar
Leighton, Angela, and Reynolds, Margaret, eds. Victorian Women Poets. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.Google Scholar
The Longman Anthology of British Literature. Damrosch, David, gen. Ed. Vol. 2. New York: Addison, 1999.Google Scholar
Lootens, Tricia. “Hemans and Home: Victorianism, Feminine ‘Internal Enemies,‘ and the Domestication of National Identity.” PMLA 109 (1994): 238–53.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O.On the Discrimination of Romanticisms.” 1924. English Romantic Poets: Modern Essays in Criticism. Ed. Abrams, M. H. New York: Oxford UP, 1960. 324.Google Scholar
McGann, Jerome J. The Romantic Ideology. Chicago: U of Chicago P. 1983.Google Scholar
Mellor, Anne K., and Matlak, Richard. eds. British Literature. 1780–1830. Fort Worth: Harcourt, 1996.Google Scholar
The Norton Anthology of English Literature. 7th cd. Ed. Abrams, M. H. and Greenblatt, Stephen. Vol. 2. New York: Norton. 2000.Google Scholar
Noyes, Russell. Introductory Survey. English Romantic Poetry and Prose. Ed. Noyes, . New York: Oxford UP, 1956. xix-xxxvi.Google Scholar
Period,” “Periodize.” The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary: Complete Text Reproduced Micrographically. 1971.Google Scholar
Period,” “Periodize.” The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989.Google Scholar
Wellek, René.Literary History.” Theory of Literature. By Wellek, and Warren, Austin. 1942. New York: Harcourt, 1956. 252–72.Google Scholar
Wellek, René.Periodization in Literary History.” Dictionary of the History of Ideas: Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas. Weiner, Philip P. Ed. in chief. Vol. 3. New York: Scribner, 1973. 481–86.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1973.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Susan J., ed. Felicia Hemans: Selected Poems, Letters, Reception Materials. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2000.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Susan J.50–50? Phone a Friend? Ask the Audience? Speculating on a Romantic Century, 1750–1850.” European Romantic Review 11 (2000): 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Susan J. Introduction. Wolfson, Felicia Hemans xiii–xxix.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Susan J., and Galperin, William, eds. “The Romantic Century.” European Romantic Review 11 (2000): 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wordsworth, William. “Extempore Effusion on the Death of James Hogg.” William Wordsworth: The Poems. Ed. Hayden, John O. Vol. 2. New Haven: Yale UP, 1981. 800–02.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. The Fourteen-Book Prelude. Ed. Owen, W. J. B. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1985.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. Preface. Lyrical Ballads. 1802. Lyrical Ballads, Wordsworth and Coleridge. Ed. Brett, R. L. and Jones, A. R. 1963. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. The Prelude: 1798–1799. Ed. Parrish, Stephen. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1977.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. The Thirteen-Book Prelude. Ed. Reed, Mark L. 2 vols. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1991.Google Scholar