Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T06:21:57.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Pardoner's Invitation: Quaestor's Bag or Becket's Shrine?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Melvin Storm
Melvin Storm*
Affiliation:
Emporia state University, Emporia, Kansas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chaucer's Pardoner functions pivotally in The Canterbury Tales, for he personifies illusory goals that can divert or halt the pilgrimage. A walking shrine, carrying spurious relics and questionable indulgences, he offers the pilgrims a meretricious equivalent of what they seek in Canterbury. His diversionary malfeasance gives thematic significance to his unsavory relationship with the Summoner and establishes a close parallel between Chaucer s pilgrimage framework and the rioters' quest in the tale itself. It is fitting that the Pardoner addresses his crucial invitation, at the end of the tale, to the Host, because the Host is responsible for guiding the pilgrims to Canterbury. The violence with which the Host responds is thus particularly appropriate, for he is confronting the man who threatens the impetus of the pilgrimage as a whole. (MS)

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 97 , Issue 5 , October 1982 , pp. 810 - 818
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Adair, John. The Pilgrims' Way: Shrines and Saints in Britain and Ireland. London: Thames and Hudson, 1978.Google Scholar
Amoils, E. R. “Fruitfulness and Sterility in the Physician's and Pardoner's Tales.” English Studies in Africa 17(1974): 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augustine. On Christian Doctrine. Trans. Robertson, D. W. Jr. New York: Liberal Arts, 1958.Google Scholar
Baum, Paull F. “Chaucer's Puns.” PMLA 71(1956): 225–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggins, D. “Chaucer's General Prologue, A 163.” Notes and Queries, ns 6(1959): 435–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Morton W. “The Pardons of Pamplona and the Pardoner of Rounceval: Piers Plowman B xvii 252.” Philological Quarterly 35(1956): 60–68.Google Scholar
Bowden, Muriel. A Commentary on the General Prologue to The Canterbury Tales. 2nd ed. London: MacMillan, 1967.Google Scholar
Bromyard, John. Quoted in F. X. Murphy. “Pilgrimages, Roman.” New Catholic Encyclopedia. 1967 ed.Google Scholar
Carton, Evan. “Complicity and Responsibility in Pandarus' Bed and Chaucer's Art.” PMLA 94(1979): 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Works of Geoffrey Chaucer. Ed. Robinson, F. N. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton, 1957.Google Scholar
Curry, Walter Clyde. “The Secret of Chaucer's Pardoner.” Journal of English and Germanic Philology 18(1919):593–606. Rpt. in his Chaucer and the Mediaeval Sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Barnes and Noble, 1960, 54–70.Google Scholar
Curtius, Ernst Robert. European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. Trans. Trask, Willard R. Bollingen Series 36. New York: Pantheon, 1953.Google Scholar
David, Alfred. “Criticism and the Old Man in Chaucer's Pardoner's Tale.” College English 27(1965): 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, Christopher. “Salvation, Damnation, and the Role of the Old Man in the Pardoner's Tale.” Chaucer Review 3(1968): 44–49.Google Scholar
Ethel, Garland. “Chaucer's Worste Shrewe: The Pardoner.” Modern Language Quarterly 20(1959): 211–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, John. The Poetry of Chaucer. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Univ. Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Gerould, Gordon Hall. Chaucerian Essays. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Hagedorn, Francis Edward. General Legislation on Indulgences. Diss. Catholic Univ. 1924. Washington: privately printed, 1924.Google Scholar
Halverson, John. “Chaucer's Pardoner and the Progress of Criticism.” Chaucer Review 4(1970): 184–202.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Marie P. “The Credentials of Chaucer's Pardoner.” Journal of English and Germanic Philology 40 (1941): 48–72.Google Scholar
Heywood, John. The Playe Called the Foure PP. In Chief Pre-Shakespearean Dramas. Ed. Adams, Joseph Quincy. Cambridge, Mass.: Houghton, 1924.Google Scholar
Howard, Donald R. The Idea of The Canterbury Tales. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Huizinga, Johan. The Waning of the Middle Ages. 1924; rpt. New York: Doubleday-Anchor, 1954.Google Scholar
Huppé, Bernard F. A Reading of The Canterbury Tales. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Jusserand, J. J. English Wayfaring Life in the Middle Ages. Trans. Smith, Lucy Toulmin. New York: Putnam's, 1889.Google Scholar
Kaske, Robert. “The Summoner's Garleek, Oynons, and Eek Lekes.” Modern Language Notes 74(1959): 481–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, Alfred L., and Haselmayer, Louis A. “Chaucer's Satire of the Pardoner.” PMLA 66(1951): 251–77. Rpt. in Kellogg's Chaucer, Langland, Arthur: Essays in Middle English Literature. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers Univ. Press, 1972, 212–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittredge, George Lyman. Chaucer and His Poetry. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1915.Google Scholar
Kittredge, George Lyman. “Chaucer's Pardoner.” Atlantic Monthly 72(1893): 829–33. Rpt. in Chaucer: Modern Essays in Criticism. Ed. Edward Wagenknecht. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1959, 117–25.Google Scholar
Knapp, Daniel. “The Relyk of a Saint: A Gloss on Chaucer's Pilgrimage.” ELH 39(1972): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lea, Henry Charles. A History of Auricular Confession and Indulgences in the Latin Church. Philadelphia: Lea Brothers, 1896. Vol. 3.Google Scholar
Lumiansky, R. M. Of Sondry Folk: The Dramatic Principle in The Canterbury Tales. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Manly, John Matthews. Some New Light on Chaucer. 1926; rpt. Gloucester, Mass.: Peter Smith, 1959.Google Scholar
Mann, Jill. Chaucer and Medieval Estates Satire: The Literature of Social Classes and the General Prologue to The Canterbury Tales. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAlpine, Monica E. “The Pardoner's Homosexuality and How It Matters.” PMLA 95(1980):8–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McVeigh, Terrence. “Chaucer's Portraits of the Pardoner and Summoner and Wyclifs Tractatus de Simonia.” Classical Folia 29(1975):54–58.Google Scholar
Miller, B. D. H. “Chaucer's General Prologue, A 673: Further Evidence.” Notes and Queries, ns 7(1960): 404–06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Robert P. “Chaucer's Pardoner, the Scriptural Eunuch, and the Pardoner's Tale.” Speculum 30 (1955): 180–99. Rpt. in Chaucer Criticism: The Canterbury Tales. Ed. Richard J. Schoeck and Jerome Taylor. Notre Dame, Ind.: Univ. of Notre Dame Press, 1960, 1:221–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millichap, Joseph R. “Transubstantiation in the Pardoner's Tale.” Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association 28(1974): 102–08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Samuel. “Chaucer's Pardoner of Rouncival.” Modern Philology 25(1927–28).59–66.Google Scholar
Ridley, Florence H. “Chaucerian Criticism: The Significance of Varying Perspectives.” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 81 (1980): 131–41.Google Scholar
Le Roman de la rose par Guillaume de Lorris et Jean de Meun. Ed. Felix Lecoy. 3 vols. Paris: Champion, 1965–70.Google Scholar
Rowland, Beryl. “Animal Imagery and the Pardoner's Abnormality.” Neophilologus 48(1964): 56–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, Beryl. Blind Beasts: Chaucer's Animal World. Kent, Ohio: Kent State Univ. Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Rowland, Beryl. “Chaucer's Idea of the Pardoner.” Chaucer Review 14(1979):140–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Schaut, Quentin L. “Chaucer's Pardoner and Indulgences.” Greyfriar: Siena Studies in Literature 3 (1961):25–39.Google Scholar
Sedgewick, G. G. “The Progress of Chaucer's Pardoner, 1880–1940.” Modern Language Quarterly 1(1940): 431–58. Rpt. in Chaucer Criticism: The Canterbury Tales. Ed. Richard J. Schoeck and Jerome Taylor. Notre Dame, Ind.: Univ. of Notre Dame Press, 1960, 1:190–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockton, Eric W. “The Deadliest Sin in the Pardoner's Tale.” Tennessee Studies in Literature 6(1961): 47–59.Google Scholar
Sumption, Jonathan. Pilgrimage: An Image of Mediaeval Religion. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield, 1975.Google Scholar
Swart, J. “Chaucer's Pardoner.” Neophilologus 36 (1952):45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurston, Herbert. “The Mediaeval Pardoner.” Month 142(1923):522–32.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor, and Turner, Edith. Image and Pilgrimage in Christian Culture: Anthropological Perspectives. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Walsingham, Thomas. Historia Anglicana. Ed. Henry Thomas Riley. Rolls Series. London, 1863. Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Williams, Arnold. “Some Documents on English Pardoners, 1350–1400.” In Mediaeval Studies in Honor of Urban Tigner Holmes, Jr. Ed. Mahoney, John and Keller, John Esten. Univ. of North Carolina Studies in the Romance Languages and Literatures, no. 56. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press, 1965, 197–207.Google Scholar
Wood, Chauncey. “The Sources of Chaucer's Summoner's ‘Garleek, Onyons, and Eke Lekes.‘” Chaucer Review 5(1971):240–44.Google Scholar
Zacher, Christian K. Curiosity and Pilgrimage: The Literature of Discovery in Fourteenth-Century England. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1976.Google Scholar