Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-pvkqz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-21T16:29:57.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconstructing the Conclusion of John of Bordeaux

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

Waldo F. McNeir
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Comment and Criticism
Information
PMLA , Volume 66 , Issue 4 , June 1951 , pp. 540 - 543
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Note 1 in page 540 Malone Soc. Reprints (1936), pp. v-vi; see the last of the 8 collotype plates reproducing portions of the MS., and pp. 54–55 of the text.

Note 2 in page 540 What seem to be portions of 6 additional lines on fol. 14v are too badly stained to be intelligible.

Note 3 in page 541 Harry R. Hoppe, “John of Bordeaux: A Bad Quarto that Never Reached Print,” Univ. of Missouri Studies, xxi (1946), 121–132.

Note 4 in page 541 Renwick concludes, p. xii, that “Greene's authorship is on the whole probable.” I tried to corroborate this view in “Robert Greene and John of Bordeaux,” PMLA, LXIV (1949), 781–801.