Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T16:39:07.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sidelights on Contemporary Criticism of Góngora's Polifemo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

Eunice Joiner Gates*
Affiliation:
Texas Technological College, Lubbock

Extract

Four seventeenth-century commentaries on the Polifemo are known to students of Góngora. Two of these are still unpublished: Annotaciones y deffensas al… Polifemo by Pedro Díaz de Rivas, the first commentary to be made of the poem, and the unfinished Notas al Polifemo by Andres Cuesta. The other two were published in Madrid a few years after Góngora's death: El Polifemo de Don Luis de Góngora comentado (1629) by Garcia de Salcedo Coronel and Lecciones solemnes a las obras de Don Luis de Góngora y Argote (1630) by José Pellicer de Salas y Tovar.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 75 , Issue 5 , December 1960 , pp. 503 - 508
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Preserved in the Biblioteca Nacional de Madrid are three manuscripts of the Annotaciones: MSS. 3093, 3906, and 3726. My references are to MS. 3726, fols. 72–221, Discvrsos Apologêticos for el eslylo del Polipkemo y Soledades, obras poélicas del Homero de Hespana D. Luis de Góngora y Argote par Pedro Diaz de Ribas, natural de Cordoba. Con annotaciones y deffensas al mismo Polipkemo y Soledades y a la canciân de Alar ache por el mismo Pedro Diaz, anno de 1624.

2 M.S. 3906, fols. 282–404 of the Biblioteca Nacional de Madrid. I have modernized the accentuation and punctuation and resolved the abbreviations when quoting from these unpublished commentaries.

3 In 1636 Salcedo Coronel reprinted El Polifemo… comentodo, together with his commentary on the Soledades. All references in this study are to the 1636 edition.

4 All references to Unes from the Polifemo are to Obras complétas de don Luis de Góngora y Argote, ed. Juan and Isabel Mille y Giménez (Madrid, 1932).

5 This reference is to Epigram 61.

6 Antonio Vilanova, Las fuentes del Polifemo (Madrid, 1957), ii, 640, observes that haya had been used in this manner earlier by Luis Carrillo y Sotomayor: “este error nâutico de Góngora, tan severamente censurado por sus detractores, procède de un pasaje… de la Cancion IV de las Obras de Don Luis Carrillo (Madrid, 1611), cuyo cargo de cuatralbo de galeras le conferia sin duda alguna, una autoridad indis-cutible en materias navales.”

7 Las fuentes del Polifemo, i, 15–17.

8 “Todo este punto puede exomar mucho lo que dize Hernando de Herrera sobre la 2. égloga de Garcilaso, en la palabra desbane, acusando nuestra negligencia en no aprovecharnos de las lenguas peregrinas.”

9 Marginal note in the MS.: “Miguel de Cervantes, en su viaje del Parnaso.”

10 “Aristotle and Early Spanish Criticism,” Esludios dedicados a Menéndez Pidal (Madrid, 1956), iv, 201–213.

11 “Carta de Don Luis de Góngora, en respuesta de la que le escribieron, ” Obras complétas de… Góngora, pp. 954–958