Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T21:14:19.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Structuring Enemy and Archival War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Allen Feldman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the wake of the collapse of the cold war bipolar world order, Jacques Derrida wrote:

Losing the enemy would simply be the loss of the political itself. … The invention of the enemy is where the urgency and the anguish are: this invention is what would have to be brought off, in sum to repoliticize, to put an end to depoliticization. Where the principal enemy, the “structuring” enemy, seems nowhere to be found, where it ceases it to be identifiable and thus reliable—that is, where the same phobia projects a mobile multiplicity of potential interchangeable metonymic enemies, in secret alliance with one another: conjuration. (Politics 84)

Type
Talks from the Convention
Information
PMLA , Volume 124 , Issue 5: Special Topic War , October 2009 , pp. 1704 - 1713
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Giorgio, Agamben. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans. Heller-Roazen, D. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Peter, Asaro. “What Should We Want from a Robot Ethics?” International Review of Information Ethics 6.12 (2006): 9–16. Print.Google Scholar
Tom, Darby. The Feast: Meditations on Politics and Time. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1982. Print.Google Scholar
Jacques, Derrida. “And Say the Animal Responded?” Zoontologies: The Question of the Animal. Ed. Wolfe, Cary. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2003. 121–46. Print.Google Scholar
Jacques, Derrida. Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. Trans. Prenowitz, Eric. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Jacques, Derrida. Dissemination. Trans. Johnson, Barbara. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1981. Print.Google Scholar
Jacques, Derrida. “Force of Law: The Mystical Foundation of Authority.” Cardozo Law Review 11 (1989–90): 920–1046. Print.Google Scholar
Jacques, Derrida. The Politics of Friendship. Trans. Collins, George. New York: Verso, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
Jacques, Derrida. Spectres of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. Trans. Knauft, Peggy. New York: Routledge, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Roberto, Esposito. Bios: Biopolitics and Philosophy. Trans. Campbell, Timothy. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Michel, Foucault. “The Right of Death and Power over Life.” The Foucault Reader. Ed. Rabinow, Paul. New York: Pantheon, 1984. 258–72. Print.Google Scholar
Martin, Heidegger. “The Question concerning Technology.” “The Question concerning Technology” and Other Essays. 1954. Trans. Lovitt, William. New York: Harper, 1977. 3–35. Print.Google Scholar
Carl, Schmitt. The Concept of the Political. Trans. Schwab, George. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1996. Print.Google Scholar