Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-5vn5w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-26T19:42:51.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Value | Theory | Crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Christopher Nealon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

My aim in this short essay is to make it possible to read these two passages together, but not in the way i think we'd typically do so in the literary humanities. The passage by Walter Benjamin is a canonical instance of left-literary writing that means to ground itself in Marx's account of capital by demonstrating that the struggle of oppressed peoples, even before the rise of capital, leaves traces in texts and in reading practices. Because of his use of the figure of “the Messiah,” it is possible to read the passage as evidence of Benjamin's messianism, though that is exactly what I intend to suggest we shouldn't do.

Information

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 127 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 101 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Agamben, Giorgio. The Time That Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans. Trans. Dailey, Patricia. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Badiou, Alain. Preface. Meillassoux vi–viii.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. On the Concept of History. Trans. Dennis Redmond. 2005. Marxists Internet Archive. N.p., n.d. Web. 2 July 2011.Google Scholar
Dauben, Joseph W. “Georg Cantor and Pope Leo XIII: Mathematics, Theology, and the Infinite.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38.1 (1977): 85–108. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
During, Simon. Exit Capitalism: Literary Culture, Theory, and Post-secular Modernity. New York: Routledge, 2010. Print.Google Scholar
Heuer, Jeff. “The Birth of Stochastic Science.” Micromotives. N.p., 11 Jan. 2007. Web. 3 July 2011.Google Scholar
Klein, Naomi. The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. New York: Metropolitan, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Capital. Trans. Fowkes, Ben. Vol. 1. London: Penguin, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Meillassoux, Quentin. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. Trans. Brassier, Ray. New York: Continuum, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Nealon, Christopher. “Reading on the Left.” Representations 108 (2009): 22–50. Print.Google Scholar
Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York: Random, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Warsh, David. Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations: A Story of Economic Discovery. New York: Norton, 2006. Print.Google Scholar