Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-jhf8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-03T07:21:48.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Not Compare?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Susan Stanford Friedman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Why not compare? It's a janus-faced question, a double entendre, its dual meanings depending on emphasis. On the one hand, what are all the reasons why we should not compare? But, on the other hand, why shouldn't we compare, and what are the costs if we do not? Embedded in these questions are more fundamental ones ranging from the epistemological to the methodological. What do we mean by comparison, what effects do our comparisons have, and how do we actually do comparison? By “we” here, I address those involved in intellectual work who face choices on whether or not to engage in comparison; I do not, in this essay, address those who study how and why individuals or human societies compare and with what consequences.

Information

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 126 , Issue 3 , May 2011 , pp. 753 - 762
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Apter, Emily. The Translation Zone: A New Comparative Literature. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2006. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balakian, Anna. “Theorizing Comparison: The Pyramid of Similitude and Difference.” Kadir, Comparative Literature 263–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernheimer, Charles, ed. Comparative Literature in the Age of Multiculturalism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Borofsky, Robert, ed. Assessing Cultural Anthropology. New York: McGraw, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Brettell, Caroline B. “Anthropology, Migration, and Comparative Consciousness.” Felski and Friedman 649–72.Google Scholar
Césaire, Aimé. Cahier d'un retour au pays natal/Notebook of a Return to the Native Land. 1939. The Collected Poetry. Trans. Eshleman, Clayton and Smith, Annette. Berkeley: U of California P, 1982. 34–85. Print.Google Scholar
Cha, Cha Theresa Hak. Dictée. 1982. Berkeley: Third World Women, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Cheah, Pheng. “Grounds of Comparison.” Culler and Cheah 1–20.Google Scholar
Cheah, Pheng. “The Material World of Comparison.” Felski and Friedman 523–46.Google Scholar
Chow, Rey. “The Old/New Question of Comparison in Literary Studies: A Post-European Perspective”. ELH 71.2 (2004): 289–311. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, James. “Traveling Cultures.” 1992. Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1997. 17–46. Print.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan. “Comparability.” Kadir, Comparative Literature 268–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, and Cheah, Pheng, eds. Grounds of Comparison: Around the Work of Benedict Anderson. London: Routledge, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Daly, Mary. Gyn/Ecology: The Meta-ethics of Radical Feminism. Boston: Beacon, 1978. Print.Google Scholar
Damrosch, David. “Comparative Literature?” PMLA 118.2 (2003): 326–30. Print.Google Scholar
Felski, Rita, and Friedman, Susan Stanford, eds. Comparison. Spec. issue of New Literary History 40.3 (2009): v–ix, 453–675. Print.Google Scholar
Friedman, Susan Stanford. “Cosmopolitanism, Women, and War: From Virginia Woolf's Three Guineas to Marjane Satrapi's Persepolis.” 2007. TS.Google Scholar
Friedman, Susan Stanford. “Modernism in a Transnational Landscape: Spatial Poetics, Postcolonialism, and Gender in Césaire's Cahier/Notebook and Cha's Dictée”. Paideuma 32.1–3 (2003): 39–74. Print.Google Scholar
Friedman, Susan Stanford. “Paranoia, Pollution, and Sexuality: Affiliations between E. M. Forster's A Passage to India and Arundhati Roy's The God of Small Things.” Geomodernisms: “Race,” Modernism, Modernity. Ed. Doyle, Laura and Winkiel, Laura. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2005. 245–61. Print.Google Scholar
Friedman, Susan Stanford. “Theory.” Modernism and Theory: A Critical Debate. Ed. Ross, Stephen. London: Routledge, 2009. 237–46. Print.Google Scholar
Friedman, Susan Stanford. “Towards a Transnational Turn in Narrative Theory: Literary Narratives, Traveling Tropes and the Case of Virginia Woolf and the Tagores”. Narrative 19.1 (2011): 1–32. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretative Anthropology. New York: Basic, 1985. Print.Google Scholar
Gentner, Dedre, Keith, J.Holyoak, and Boicho N. Koki nov, eds. The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology. Cambridge: MIT P, 2001. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handler, Richard. “The Uses of Incommensurability in Anthropology.” Felski and Friedman 627–48.Google Scholar
Harootunian, Harry. “Some Thoughts on Comparability and the Space-Time Problem.” Harootunian and Park 23–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harootunian, Harry, and Park, Hyun Ok, eds. Problems of Comparability/Possibilities for Comparative Studies. Spec. issue of Boundary 2 32.2 (2005): 1–251. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
H.D. “Oread.” Collected Poems of H.D. Ed. Martz, Louis L. New York: New Directions, 1983. 55. Print.Google Scholar
Isstaif, Abdul-Nabi. “Beyond the Notion of Influence: Notes toward an Alternative.” Kadir, Comparative Literature 281–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadir, Djelal. “Comparative Literature Hinternational.” Kadir, Comparative Literature 245–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadir, Djelal, ed. Comparative Literature: States of the Art. Spec. issue of World Literature Today 69.2 (1995): 245–303. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadir, Djelal, ed. Globalization and World Literature. Spec. issue of Comparative Literature Studies 41.1 (2004): 1–184. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koelb, Clayton, and Noakes, Susan, eds. Comparative Practice on Literature: Approaches to Theory and Practice. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1988. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layoun, Mary N. “Endings and Beginnings: Reimagining the Tasks and Spaces of Comparison.” Felski and Friedman 583–608.Google Scholar
Loomba, Ania. “Race and the Possibilities of Comparative Critique.” Felski and Friedman 501–22.Google Scholar
Melas, Natalie. All the Difference in the World: Postcoloniality and the Ends of Comparison. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Melas, Natalie. “Versions of Incommensurability.” Kadir, Comparative Literature 275–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohan, Chandra, ed. Aspects of Comparative Literature: Current Approaches. New Delhi: India, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura. “Comparative Consciousness.” Borofsky 84–96.Google Scholar
Osborne, Peter. “On Comparability: Kant and the Possibility of Comparative Studies.” Harootunian and Park 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pound, Ezra. “In a Station of the Metro”. The Selected Poems of Ezra Pound. New York: New Directions, 1957. 35. Print.Google Scholar
Pratt, Mary Louise. “Comparative Literature and Global Citizenship.” Bernheimer 58–65.Google Scholar
Propp, V. Morphology of the Folktale. 1928. Trans. Laurence Scott. Bloomington: Indiana U Research Center, 1958. Print.Google Scholar
Radhakrishnan, R. “The Politics of Comparison.” Radha-krishnan, Theory 72–81.Google Scholar
Radhakrishnan, R. Theory in an Uneven World. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radhakrishnan, R. “Why Compare?” Felski and Friedman 453–72.Google Scholar
Reinhard, Kenneth. “Kant with Sade, Lacan with Levinas”. MLN 110.4 (1995): 785–808. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, I. A. Principles of Literary Criticism. London: Kegan, 1924. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Bruce. “Chomsky's Golden Rule: Comparison and Cosmopolitanism.” Felski and Friedman 547–66.Google Scholar
Said, Edward W.“Traveling Theory”. The World, the Text, and the Critic. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1983. 226–47. Print.Google Scholar
Satrapi, Marjane. Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood. 2000. Trans. Mattias Ripa and Blake Ferris. New York: Pantheon, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Saussy, Haun. “Comparative Literature?” PMLA 118.2 (2003): 336–41. Print.Google Scholar
Saussy, Haun, ed. Comparative Literature in an Age of Globalization. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Shih, Shu-mei. “Comparative Racialization: An Introduction”. PMLA 123.5 (2008): 1347–62. Print.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. “Rethinking Comparativism.” Felski and Friedman 609–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stam, Robert, and Shohat, Ella. “Transnationalizing Comparison: The Uses and Abuses of Cross-Cultural Analogy.” Felski and Friedman 473–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoler, Ann Laura. “Tense and Tender Ties: The Politics of Comparison in North American History and (Post)Colonial Studies”. Journal of American History 88.3 (2001): 829–65. Print.Google Scholar
Suls, Jerry, and Wheeler, Ladd, eds. Handbook of Social Comparison: Theory and Research. New York: Plenum–Kluwer Academic, 2000. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Theories and Methodologies: Comparative Literature”. PMLA 118.2 (2003): 326–41. Print.Google Scholar
Tsing, Anna L. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2005. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkowitz, Rebecca L. “Comparison Literature.” Felski and Friedman 567–82.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. Three Guineas. 1938. New York: Harcourt, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Yengoyan, Aram A., ed. Modes of Comparison: Theory and Practice. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2006. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yengoyan, Aram A., ed. “On the Issue of Comparison.” Introduction. Yengoyan, Modes 1–27.Google Scholar