Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-hwk5l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-07T06:12:41.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constructing Arctic security: an inter-disciplinary approach to understanding security in the Barents region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2016

Kamrul Hossain ,
Gerald Zojer ,
Wilfrid Greaves ,
J. Miguel Roncero  and
Michael Sheehan
Kamrul Hossain
Affiliation:
Northern Institute for Environmental and Minority Law, Arctic Centre, University of Lapland, P.O. Box 122, FI-96101 Rovaniemi, Finland
Gerald Zojer
Affiliation:
Northern Institute for Environmental and Minority Law, Arctic Centre, University of Lapland, P.O. Box 122, FI-96101 Rovaniemi, Finland (gerald.zojer@ulapland.fi)
Wilfrid Greaves
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, 1 Devonshire Place, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S3K7
J. Miguel Roncero
Affiliation:
University of Vienna and Austrian Polar Research Institute (APRI) Universitätsring 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria
Michael Sheehan
Affiliation:
Department of Political and Cultural Studies, Swansea University, Singleton Park, SA4 3SA, Swansea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The field of Security Studies traditionally focused on military threats to states' survival, however, since the end of the Cold War the concept of security has widened and individuals and communities have gradually become viewed as appropriate referent objects of security: Multifaceted challenges facing communities at the sub-state level are increasingly regarded as security threats, including their potential to cause instability for the larger society, thus affecting states’ security. In the Arctic region, a central challenge is that inhabitants are exposed to multiple non-traditional and non-military threats resulting from environmental, economic, and societal changes, which can be understood as threats to human security. We argue that a comprehensive approach to human security overlaps with the concept of societal security, and must therefore consider threats to collective identity and the essential conditions necessary for the maintenance and preservation of a distinct society. We see the human security framework as a suitable analytical tool to study the specific challenges that threaten the Arctic population, and in turn the well-being of Arctic societies. Therefore, we argue that utilising the concept of human security can promote societal security in the context of the Arctic, and in particular, its sub-regions, for example, the Barents region.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 52 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

ACIA. 2005. Arctic climate impact assessment. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Acharya, A. 2001. Human security: east versus west. International Journal 56 (3): 442–460.Google Scholar
Adler, E. and Barnett, M. (editors). 1998. Security communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
African Union. 2005. The common African position on the proposed reform of the United Nations: the Ezulwini Consensus. URL: http://www.responsibilitytoprotect.org/files/AU_Ezulwini%20Consensus.pdf (accessed 20 May 2015).Google Scholar
Agius, C. 2013. Social constructivism. In: Collins, A. (editor). Contemporary security studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 70–86.Google Scholar
AHDR. 2004. Arctic human development report. Akureyri: Stefansson Arctic Institute.Google Scholar
AHDR. 2014. Arctic human development report – regional processes and global linkages (AHDR). TemaNord2014: 567, Copenhagen, Nordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
Alfred, T. 1999. Power, peace, righteousness: an indigenous manifesto. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anaya, S. J. 2011. Report on extractive industries operating within or near indigenous territories. Report to the Human Rights Council, 11 July 2011, A/HRC/18/35.Google Scholar
Annan, K. 2000. Secretary-general salutes international workshop on human security in Mongolia, SG/SM/7382 URL: http://www.un.org/press/en/2000/20000508.sgsm7382.doc.html (accessed 15 June 2015).Google Scholar
Aarsæther, N., Riabova, L. and Bærenholdt, J.O.. 2004. Community viability. In: AHDR (Arctic human development report). Akureyri: Stefansson Arctic Institute: 139–154.Google Scholar
Bain, W. 2006. Introduction. In: Bain, W. (editor). The empire of security and the safety of the People, London, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, D.A. 1997. The concept of security. Review of International Studies 23 (1): 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behringer, R.M. 2005. Middle power leadership on the human security agenda. Cooperation and Conflict 40 (3): 305–342.Google Scholar
Berkman, P.A. and Vylegzhanin, A.N.. 2013. Building common interests in the Arctic Ocean. In: Berkman, P.A. and Vylegzhanin, A.N. (editors). Environmental security in the Arctic Ocean. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C, Environmental Security: 371–404.Google Scholar
Biersteker, T. J. and Weber, C. (editors). 1996. State sovereignty as social construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bigo, D. 2013. International political sociology. In: Williams, P. D. (editor). Security studies: an introduction. New Work: Routledge: 116–130.Google Scholar
Booth, K. 1991. Security and emancipation. Review of International Studies 17 (4): 313–326.Google Scholar
Booth, K. (editor). 2005. Critical security studies and world politics. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Buzan, B. 1983. People, states and fear: the national security problem in international relations. London: Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Buzan, B. 2004. A reductionist, idealistic notion that adds little analytical value. Security Dialogue 35 (3): 369–370.Google Scholar
Buzan, B., Wæver, O. and De Wilde, J.. 1998. Security: a new framework for analysis. London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Buzan, B. and Hansen, L.. 2009. The evolution of international security studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, M. 2010. Who owns the Arctic? Understanding sovereignty disputes in the north. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre Publishers.Google Scholar
Centre for Security Studies (CSS). 2011. Human security: Genesis, debates, trends. CSS analysis in security policy No. 90 (March 2011). URL: http://www.css.ethz.ch/publications/pdfs/CSS-Analysis-90-EN.pdf (accessed 12 June 2015).Google Scholar
Chandler, D. 2008. Human security: the dog that didn't bark. Security Dialogue 39 (4): 427–438.Google Scholar
Commission on Human Security (CHS). 2003. Human Security Now. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Collins, A. 2013. Contemporary security studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deiter, C. and Rude, D.. 2005. Human security and aboriginal women in Canada. Ottawa: Status of Women Canada.Google Scholar
Duffield, M. and Waddel, N.. 2006. Securing humans in a dangerous world. International Politics 43: 1–23.Google Scholar
Easterlin, R.A. 2010. Well-being, front and center: a note on the Sarkozy report. Population and Development Review 36 (1): 119–124.Google Scholar
Exner-Pirot, H. 2012. Human security in the Arctic: the foundation of regional cooperation. Working Papers on Arctic Security No 1. Toronto: Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Fehl, C. 2004. Explaining the international criminal court: a ‘practice test’ for rationalist and constructivist approaches. European Journal of International Relations 10 (3): 357–394.Google Scholar
Floyd, R. 2007. Human security and the Copenhagen school's securitization approach: conceptualizing human security as a securitizing move. Human Security Journal 5 (1): 38–49.Google Scholar
Gasper, D. 2014. Human security: from definitions to investigating a discourse. In: Martin, M. and Owen, T. (editors). Routledge Handbook of Human Security. London and New York: Routledge: 28–42.Google Scholar
Greaves, W. 2012a. For whom, from what? Canada's Arctic Policy and the Narrowing of Human Security. International Journal 67 (1): 219–240.Google Scholar
Greaves, W. 2012b. Insecurities of non-dominance: re-theorizing human security and environmental change in developed states. In: Schnurr, M.A. and Swatuk, L.A. (editors). Natural resources and social conflict: towards critical environmental security. New York: Palgrave: 63–82.Google Scholar
Greaves, W. 2016a. Environment, identity, autonomy: Inuit perspectives on Arctic security. In: Hossain, K. and Petrétei, A. (editors). Understanding the many faces of human security: perspectives of northern indigenous peoples. Leiden and Boston: Brill Nijhoff: 35–55.Google Scholar
Greaves, W. 2016b. Arctic in/security and indigenous peoples: comparing Inuit in Canada and Sámi in Norway. Accepted by Security Dialogue, doi: 10.1177/0967010616665957.Google Scholar
Griffiths, F. 2008. Not that good a fit? “Human security” and the Arctic. Arctic security in the 21st Century. Conference Report, April 2008. Vancouver: Simon Fraser University School for International Studies: 56–60.Google Scholar
Hampson, F.O. 2013. Human security. In: Williams, P.D. (editor). Security studies: an introduction. New Work: Routledge: 229−243.Google Scholar
Hampson, F.O., Daudelin, J., Hay, J., Reid, H. and Martin, T.. 2002. Madness in the multitude: human security and world disorder. Don Mills: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hastings, D.A. (2008, 2010): Human security index. URL: http://www.humansecurityindex.org/ (accessed 15 June 2015).Google Scholar
Hedlund, C., Blomstedt, Y. and Schumann, B.. 2014. Association between climatic factors and infectious diseases in the Arctic and subarctic region – A systematic review. Global Health Action 7: 24161–24176.Google Scholar
Heininen, L. 2010. Globalization and security in the circumpolar north. In: Heininen, L. and Southcott, C. (editors). Globalization of the Circumpolar North. Fairbanks, University of Alaska Press: 221–264.Google Scholar
Heininen, L. 2011. Arctic strategies and policies. Inventory and comparative study. Akureyri: The Northern Research Forum and University of Lapland Press.Google Scholar
Heininen, L. 2013. 'Politicization’ of the environment: environmental politics and security in the Circumpolar North. In: Zellen, B.S. (editor). The fast-changing Arctic: rethinking Arctic security for a warmer world. Calgary: University of Calgary Press: 35–55.Google Scholar
Hilde, P.S. 2014. Armed forces and security challenges in the Arctic. In: Tamnes, R. and Offerdal, K. (editors). Geopolitics and security in the Arctic. Regional dynamics in a global world. New York: Routledge: 147–165.Google Scholar
Hoogensen, G. and Stuvoy, K.. 2006. Gender, resistance, and human security. Security Dialogue 37 (2): 207–228.Google Scholar
Hoogensen, G., Bazely, D., Christensen, J. and others. 2009. Human security in the Arctic – yes, it is relevant. Journal of Human Security 5: 1–10.Google Scholar
Hoogensen, G. 2012. Security by any other name: Negative security, positive security, and a multi-actor security approach. Review of International Studies 38 (4): 835–859.Google Scholar
Hoogensen, G., Bazely, D.R., Goloviznina, M. and Tanentzap, A.J. (editors). 2014. Environmental and Human Security in the Arctic. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hossain, K. and Petrétei, A. (editors). 2016. Understanding the many faces of human security: perspectives of northern indigenous peoples. Brill Academic Publisher.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, M. 2005. The securitization of migration: a racial discourse. International Migration 43 (5): 163–187 Google Scholar
Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC). 2009. A circumpolar Inuit declaration on sovereignty in the Arctic. Nuuk: Inuit Circumpolar Council.Google Scholar
Irlbacher-Fox, S., Price, J. and Wilson Rowe, E.. 2014. Women's participation in decision making: human security in the Canadian Arctic. In: Hoogensen Gjørv, G., Bazely, D.R., Goloviznina, M. and Tanentzap, A.J. (editors). Environmental and human security in the Arctic. New York: Routledge: 203–230.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, M. and Young, T.K.. 2008. Cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and obesity. In: Young, T. K. and Bjerregaard, P. (editors). Health transitions in Arctic populations. Toronto, Buffalo and London: University of Toronto Press: 291–307.Google Scholar
Keohane, R.O. 1988. International institutions: Two approaches. International Studies Quarterly 32 (4): 379–396.Google Scholar
Keskitalo, C. 2004. The Arctic as an international region - but for whom? In: Koivurova, T., Joona, T. and Shnoro, R. (editors). Arctic governance. Juridica Lapponica 29, Rovaniemi: Oy Sevenprint: 2–26.Google Scholar
Kraska, J. (editor). 2011. Arctic security in an age of climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krause, K. 2004. The key to a powerful agenda, if properly delimited. Security Dialogue 35 (3): 367–368.Google Scholar
Krause, K. and Williams, M.C.. 1997. From strategy to security: foundations of critical security studies. In: Krause, K. and Williams, M.C. (editors). Critical security studies: concepts and cases. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Koivurova, T., Masloboev, V., Hossain, K. and others. 2015. Legal protection of Sami traditional livelihoods from the adverse impacts of mining: a comparison of the level of protection enjoyed by Sami in their four home states. Arctic Review on Law and Politics 6 (1): 11–51.Google Scholar
Koutaki, K. and Farget, D.. 2012. The participation of European minority peoples in public policy decision-making: a national and supranational legal perspective. Montreal: Centre for International Sustainable Development Law.Google Scholar
Le Billon, P. 2001. The political ecology of war: natural resources and armed conflicts. Political Geography 20 (5): 561–584.Google Scholar
Le Mière, C. and Mazo, J.. 2013. Arctic opening: insecurity and opportunity. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Letchera, R.J., Bustnesb, J.O., Dietzc, R. and six others. 2010. Exposure and effects assessment of persistent organohalogen contaminants in Arctic wildlife and fish. Science of the Total Environment 408: 2995–3043.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 2014. Two treatises of government. North Charleston: CreateSpace.Google Scholar
Lowry, M. 2002. Creating human insecurity: the national security focus in Canada's immigration system. Refuge 21 (1): 28–39.Google Scholar
Lukovich, J. V. and McBean, G.A.. 2009. Addressing human security in the Arctic in the context of climate change through science and technology. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 14: 697–710.Google Scholar
Magga, O. H., Mathiesen, S.D., Corell, R.W. and Osaka, A. (editors). 2011. Reindeer herding, traditional knowledge and adaptation to climate change and loss of grazing land. A project led by Norway and Association of World Reindeer Herders (WRH) in Arctic Council, Sustainable Development Working Group (SDWG). URL: http://reindeerherding.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/EALAT-Final-Report.pdf (accessed 13 December 2015).Google Scholar
Martello, M.L. 2008. Arctic indigenous peoples as representations and representatives of climate change. Social Studies of Science 38 (3): 351–376.Google Scholar
McDonald, M. 2013. Social constructivism. In: Williams, P. D. (editor). Security studies: an introduction. New Work: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J. 1994/95. The false promise of international institutions. International Security 19 (3): 5–49.Google Scholar
Morozov, Y. 2009. The Arctic: the next "hot spot" of international relations or a region of cooperation? Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs. URL: http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/publications/articles_papers_reports/0039.html (accessed 12 May 2015).Google Scholar
Mutimer, D. 2013. Critical security studies. In: Collins, A. (editor). Contemporary security studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 87–107.Google Scholar
Newman, E. 2001. Human security and constructivism. International Studies Perspectives 2 (3): 239–251.Google Scholar
Newman, E. 2010. Critical human security studies. Review of International Studies 36 (1): 77–94.Google Scholar
Nicol, H. and Heininen, L.. 2013. Human security, the Arctic Council and climate change: competition or co-existence? Polar Record 50 (1): 80–85.Google Scholar
Owen, T. 2004. Challenges and opportunities for defining and measuring human security. Disarmament Forum Issue 3: 15–24.Google Scholar
Paris, R. 2001. Human security: Paradigm shift or hot air? International Security 26 (2): 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennanen, J. 2002. Reindeer herding – the defining cultural element in the circumpolar region. In: Pennanen, J. and Näkkäläjärvi, K. (editors). Siidastallan. From Lapp communities to modern Sámi life. Inari: Publication of the Inari Sámi Museum: 60–61.Google Scholar
Pennanen, J. and Näkkäläjärvi, K. (editors). 2002. Siidastallan. From Lapp communities to modern Sámi life. Inari: Publication of the Inari Sámi Museum.Google Scholar
Peoples, C. and Vaughan-Williams, N.. 2010. Critical security studies: an introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peou, S. 2002. The UN, peacekeeping, and collective human security: From an agenda for peace to the Brahimi report. International Peacekeeping 9 (2): 51–68.Google Scholar
Price, R. 1998. Reversing the gun sights: transnational civil society targets landmines. International Organization 52 (3): 613–644.Google Scholar
Rafaelsen, R. 2013. The Barents cooperation: region building and new security challenges. Strategic Analysis 37 (4): 486–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riddell-Dixon, E. 2005. Canada's human security agenda: walking the talk? International Journal 60 (4): 1067–1092.Google Scholar
Roe, P. 2008. The ‘value’ of positive security. Review of International Studies 34 (4): 777–794.Google Scholar
Rothschild, E. 1995. What is security? Daedalus 124 (3): 53–98.Google Scholar
Rynning, S. 2011. Realism and the common security and defence policy. Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (1): 23–42.Google Scholar
Sabin, J. 2014. Contested colonialism: responsible government and political development in Yukon. Canadian Journal of Political Science 47 (2): 375–396.Google Scholar
Saugestad, S. 2012. Regional and indigenous identities in the High North: enacting social boundaries. Polar Record 48 (246): 229–235.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1999. Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2000. Why human security? Text of presentation at the ‘International Symposium on Human Security’ in Tokyo, 28 July, 2000. URL: http://www.ucipfg.com/Repositorio/MCSH/MCSH-05/BLOQUE-ACADEMICO/Unidad-01/complementarias/3.pdf (accessed 23 August 2012).Google Scholar
Seurujärvi-Kari, I., Pedersen, S. and Hirvonen, V.. 1997: The Sámi the indigenous people of northernmost Europe. Brussels: European Bureau for Lesser Used Languages.Google Scholar
Shani, G. 2011. Securitizing ‘bare life’: critical perspectives on human security discourse. In: Chandler, D. and Hynek, N. (editors). Critical perspectives on human security: Rethinking emancipation and power in international relations. New York: Routledge: 56–68.Google Scholar
Smith, S. 2004. Singing our world into existence: international relations theory and September 11. International Studies Quarterly 48 (3): 419–515.Google Scholar
Smith, S. 2005. The contested concept of security. In: Booth, K. (editor). Critical security studies and world politics. Boulder: Lynne Rienner: 27–62.Google Scholar
Stenbæk, M. 1985. Arctic policy – blueprint for an Inuit homeland. Etudes/Inuit/Studies 9 (2): 59.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J.E., Sen, A. and Fitoussi, J.P.. 2009. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. CMEPSP. URL: http://www.insee.fr/fr/publications-et-services/dossiers_web/stiglitz/doc-commission/RAPPORT_anglais.pdf (accessed 12 November 2015).Google Scholar
Stuvøy, K. 2014. Human security and women's security reality in northwest Russia. In: Hoogensen Gjørv, G., Bazely, D.R., Goloviznina, M. and Tanentzap, A.J. (editors). Environmental and human security in the Arctic. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tadjbakhsh, S. and Chenoy, A.M.. 2007. Human security: concepts and implications. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Tamnes, R. and Offerdal, K. (editors). 2014. Geopolitics and security in the Arctic: regional dynamics in a global world. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tana River Fishing Administration. No date. Catch statistics: Norwegian and Finnish catch of salmon. URL: http://tanafisk.no/en/statistikk/fangststatistikk (accessed 20 April 2015).Google Scholar
Tennberg, M., Vola, J., Espiritu, A. and others. 2014. Neoliberal governance, sustainable development and local communities in the Barents region. Barents Studies 1 (1): 41–72.Google Scholar
Thiel, M. 2007. Identity, society and regional integration in Europe. Jean Monnet/Robert Schuman Paper Series 7 (6), Miami: University of Miami.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. 1999. Introduction. In: Thomas, C. and Wilkin, P. (editors). Globalization, human security, and the African experience. Boulder: Lynne Rienner: 1–22.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. and Wilkin, P. (editors). 1999. Globalization, human security, and the African experience. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Thomas, N. and Tow, W.T.. 2002. The utility of human security: sovereignty and humanitarian intervention. Security Dialogue 33 (2): 177–192.Google Scholar
UN charter 1945. Charter of the United Nations and statute of the International Court of Justice. San Francisco: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 1994. Human development report: New dimensions of human security. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
US Agency for International Development (USAID). 2004. Minerals & conflict - a toolkit for intervention. Washington: USAID, Office of Conflict Management and Mitigation.Google Scholar
Vienna Declaration 1991. The Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action. URL: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Events/OHCHR20/VDPA_booklet_English.pdf (accessed 12 June 2015).Google Scholar
Wæver, O., Buzan, B., Kelstrup, M. and Lemaitre, P.. 1993. Identity, migration and the new security agenda in Europe. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Walt, S.M. 1991. The renaissance of security studies. International Studies Quarterly 35 (2): 211–239.Google Scholar
Watson, S. 2011. The ‘human’ as referent object? Humanitarianism as securitization. Security Dialogue 42 (1): 3–20.Google Scholar
Wendt, A. 1999. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Working Group of Indigenous Peoples in the Barents Euro-Arctic Region (WGIP) 2009. Action plan for indigenous peoples in the Barents Euro-Arctic Region 2009–2012. Tromsø, January 21st 2009.Google Scholar
Williams, P.D. 2013. Security studies: an introduction. New Work: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilson Rowe, E. (editor). 2009. Russia and the north. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
World Economic Forum (WEF) 2015. Global risk 2015. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
Young, O.R. and Einarsson, N.. 2004. A human development agenda for the Arctic: major findings and emerging issues. In: AHDR (Arctic human development report), Akureyri: Stefansson Arctic Institute: 229–242.Google Scholar
Zellen, B.S. 2009. Arctic boom, Arctic doom. Santa Barbara: ABC Clio.Google Scholar
Zimmerbauer, K. 2013. Unusual regionalism in northern Europe: The Barents region in the making. Regional Studies 47 (1): 89–103.Google Scholar
Zojer, G. 2014. Energy politics in Arctic governance: a shift from environmental protection toward economic development? Diploma thesis, University of Vienna. Unpublished.Google Scholar