Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T21:07:23.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Could Captain Scott have been saved? Cecil Meares and the ‘second journey’ that failed: a response to Bill Alp

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2018

Karen May
Karen May*
Affiliation:
27 Old Gloucester Street. London, WC1N 3AX (karenmay31@gmail.com)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Alp makes some factual corrections regarding the ‘second obfuscation’ and ‘third obfuscation’ identified in the article. Regarding the ‘second obfuscation’, Alp is correct that the man-haulers (of the 3 X.S. supplies) had not yet returned from base on 17 January 1912, and would not return until 23 January. However, Alp's objection does not exonerate Meares. On 31 January 1912, expedition member Apsley Cherry-Garrard recorded that Meares supposedly had considered departing on the ‘second journey’, but had been assured by the man-haulers that there was already ‘plenty for all parties’ with ‘what they had left at 1 Ton’. The key date was 17 January 1912, when Meares still had time to either leave (for the ‘second journey’, a projected two-week depot run) or remain at base. Meares’ inaction on that date therefore cannot be excused by reassurance from the man-haulers on what they ‘had left’ at One Ton, as on 17 January the man-haulers had not yet returned to base to deliver such reassurance.

Type
Commentary
Information
Polar Record , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , March 2018 , pp. 183 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alp, B. (2018). Commentary on Could Captain Scott have been saved? Cecil Meares and the ‘second journey’ that failed. Polar Record, doi:10.1017/S0032247418000189.Google Scholar
Cherry-Garrard, A. (1994). The worst journey in the world. London: Picador.Google Scholar
Evans, E.R.G.R. (1921). South with Scott. London: W. Collins, Sons & Co.Google Scholar
May, K. (2013). Could Captain Scott have been saved? Revisiting Scott's last expedition. Polar Record, 49, 72–90.Google Scholar
May, K., & Airriess, S. (2015). Could Captain Scott have been saved? Cecil Meares and the ‘second journey’ that failed. Polar Record, 51, 260–273.Google Scholar
May, K., & Lewis, G. (2015). ‘They are not the ponies they ought to have been’: revisiting Cecil Meares’ purchase of Siberian ponies for Captain Scott's British Antarctic (Terra Nova) Expedition (1910–1913). Polar Record, 51, 655–666.Google Scholar
Oates, L.E.G. (1911). Letter to C. Oates, 24 October 1911. Cambridge: Scott Polar Research Institute, MS 1317/1/3.Google Scholar
Scott, R.F. (1913). Scott's last expedition. Vol. I. New York: Dodd, Mead and Co.Google Scholar
Simpson, G.C. (1911). Journal, November 1911 – 10 April 1912. Cambridge: Scott Polar Research Institute, MS 704/4.Google Scholar
Strathie, A. (2015). From ice floes to battlefields: Scott's ‘Antarctics' in the first world war. Stroud, Gloucestershire: The History Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.A. (1911). Sketchbook. Cambridge: Scott Polar Research Institute, MS 797/1.Google Scholar