Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:24:01.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International collaboration in Antarctica: the International Polar Years, the International Geophysical Year, and the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

Colin P. Summerhayes
Colin P. Summerhayes*
Affiliation:
Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR), Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1ER
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As the fourth International Polar Year (IPY) 2007–2008, gets into full swing it is timely to reflect on the history of development of international scientific collaboration in the IPYs since the first one in 1882–1883, including the third, which evolved into the International Geophysical Year (IGY) of 1957–1958. The success of international scientific collaboration in the IGY led the International Council for Science (ICSU), the body that managed the IGY, to create the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) to carry forward the collaboration in Antarctic science that had begun during the IGY. This year, 2008, seems an appropriate time to undertake such an historical review, given that we are not only midway through the fourth IPY, but also that it is SCAR's 50th anniversary; the first SCAR meeting having been held in The Hague on 3–5 February 1958. Since SCAR's membership began with 12 member countries and 4 ICSU unions, membership has grown to 34 countries and 8 ICSU unions, with more expected to join at the 30th meeting of SCAR in Moscow in July 2008. Both SCAR's activities and those of the fourth IPY benefit from international collaboration not only between scientists, but also between the national Antarctic operations managers, working together through the Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programmes (COMNAP), and national policy makers working together through the Antarctic Treaty mechanisms. Thanks to all their efforts, the IPY of 2007–2009 will leave behind a legacy of enhanced observing systems for documenting the status and change of all aspects of the Antarctic environment as the basis for improved forecasting of its future condition. SCAR expects to play a major role in the design of those systems and their use to improve scientific understanding of the place of the Antarctic in the global environmental system, and the pace and direction of change within that system.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , October 2008 , pp. 321 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arntzd, W.E., and Clarke, A.. (editors) 2002. Ecological studies in the Antarctic sea ice zone. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Astapenko, P.D., and Treshnikov, A.F.. 1967. Inter-relationship between meteorology, oceanography and glaciology in Antarctic studies. Oxford: Pergamon (Annals of the International Geophysical Year 44): 96–121.Google Scholar
Baker, F.W.G. 1982a. The first International Polar Year, 1882–83. Polar Record 21 (132): 275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, F.W.G. 1982b. A century of international interdisciplinary co-operation. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 7 (4): 270–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, F.W.G. 1983. Anniversaries of the polar years and the International Geophysical Year. Geneva (ninth WMO Congress unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
Barr, W. 2007. International Polar Years. In: Riffenburgh, B. (editor). Encyclopedia of the Antarctic. New York, London: Routledge 1: 537–539.Google Scholar
Bell, R.E. 2007. Antarctic earth system science in the International Polar Year 2007–2008. In: Cooper, A., Raymond, C., and the ISAES editorial team (editors). Antarctica: a keystone in a changing world. Santa Barbara: USGS (tenth SCAR international symposium on Antarctic earth sciences (ISAES) 26 August–1 September 2007. USGS open file report 2007–1047).Google Scholar
Bergstrom, D.M., Convey, P., and Huiskes, A.H.L. (editors). 2006. Trends in Antarctic terrestrial and limnetic ecosystems: Antarctica as a global indicator. Dordrecht: Springer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berson, A., and Breitfuss, L.. 1927. Sitzung des Sonderausschusses am 16.11.1926. Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen (Ergänzungsheft) 191: 110–113.Google Scholar
Brooks, C.E.P. 1959. Meteorological results of the second International Polar Year, 1932–33. London: Pergamon (Annals of the International Geophysical Year 1 (II)): 261–265Google Scholar
Clarke, A., Arntz, W.E., and Smith, C.R. (editors). 2006. EASIZ: ecology of the Antarctic sea ice zone. Deep-Sea Research 53 (II) (8–10): 803–1140.Google Scholar
Ehrhart, S.B. 1902. Die Verteilung der Temperatur und des Luftdruckes auf der Erdoberfläche im Polarjahre 1882/1883. Inauguraldissertation. Stuttgart: Stuttgarter Vereins-Buchdruckerei, Stuttgart, 36 S., 4 Tf. [Temperature distribution and pressure distribution of the surface of the Earth during the Polar Year 1882/1883. PhD dissertation. Stuttgart: Stuttgarter Vereins-Buchdruckerei]Google Scholar
El-Sayed, S.Z. (editor). 1994. Southern ocean ecology: the BIOMASS perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feldstein, Y.I., and Starkov, G.V.. 1967. Dynamics of auroral belt and polar geomagnetic disturbances. Planetary Space Science 15 (1): 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fifield, R. 1987. International Research in the Antarctic. Oxford: Oxford University Press (SCAR/ICSU Press, Oxford Scientific Publications).Google Scholar
Fogg, G.E. 2007. International Geophysical Year. In: Riffenburgh, B. (editor). Encyclopedia of the Antarctic 1 535–536.Google Scholar
Goodison, B., Brown, J., Jezek, K., Key, J., Prowse, T., Snorrason, A., and Worby, T.. 2007. State and fate of the polar cryosphere, including variability of the Arctic hydrological cycle. World Meteorological Organization Bulletin 56 (4): 284–292.Google Scholar
Gould, L.M. 1967. The effects of the IGY on the progress of research and exploration in the Antarctic. Oxford: Pergamon (Annals of the International Geophysical Year 44): 1–6.Google Scholar
Holdgate, M.W. 1967. Biology. Annals of the IGY 44: 7–22Google Scholar
ICSU (International Council for Science). 2004. A framework for the International Polar Year 2007–2008. ICSU (ICSU IPY 2007–2008 planning group, October 2004).Google Scholar
ICSU/WMO (International Council for Science/World Meteorological Organization). 2007. The scope of science for the International Polar Year 2007–2008. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization (Produced by the ICSU/WMO Joint Committee for IPY 2007–2008. WMO TD No. 1364).Google Scholar
IGY (International Geophysical Year). 1967. International Geophysical Year stations in Antarctica and the sub–Antarctic islands. In: Antarctica. Oxford: Pergamon (Annals of the International Geophysical Year 44): 200–201.Google Scholar
IMC (International Meteorological Congress). 1879. Report of the Proceedings of the Second International Meteorological Congress at Rome. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Jones, H.S. 1959. The inception and development of the International Geophysical Year. Oxford: Pergamon (Annals of the International Geophysical Year 1 (III)): 383–413.Google Scholar
Lambert, B.P. 1967. Cartography. Oxford: Pergamon (Annals of the International Geophysical Year 44): 23–52.Google Scholar
Laursen, V. 1951. Bibliography for the second International Polar Year, 1923–33. Copenhagen: International Meteorological Organization (temporary commission on the Liquidation of the Polar Year 1932–33).Google Scholar
Laursen, V. 1959. The second International Polar Year, 1932–33. London: Pergamon (Annals of the International Geophysical Year 1(II)): 211–234.Google Scholar
Lüdecke, C. 2004. The first International Polar Year (1882–83): a big science experiment with small science equipment. History of Meteorology 1: 55–64.Google Scholar
Lüdecke, C. 2007a. Die Internationalen Polarjahre; 125 Jahre Herausforderung für Wissenschaft und Politik. Naturwissenschaftliche Rundschau 60 (12): 621–628.Google Scholar
Lüdecke, C. 2007b. Über die Globale Verteilung von Luftdruck und Temperatur am Beispiel des 1. Internationalen Polarjahres 1882/1883. Hamburg: DACH MT. URL: http://meetings.copernicus.org/dach2007/download/DACH2007_A_00400.pdfGoogle Scholar
Mill, H.R. 1902. Dr. von Neumayer and polar research. Geographical Journal 19 (3): 362–364.Google Scholar
Mill, H.R. 1909. Obituary: Dr. Georg von Neumayer. Geographical Journal 34 (4): 460–462.Google Scholar
Mills, W.J. 2003 Exploring polar frontiers–a historical encyclopedia. Santa Barbara: ABCClio.Google Scholar
Nagata, T., and Oguti, T.. 1967. Inter-relationships between the upper atmosphere and geomagnetic disturbances in Antarctica. Oxford: Pergamon (Annals of the International Geophysical Year 44): 53–65.Google Scholar
Neumayer, G. von. 1901. Auf zum Südpol! 45 Jahre Wirkung zur Förderung der Erforschung der Südpolar-Region, 1855–1900. Berlin: Vita Deutsches Verlagshaus.Google Scholar
SCAR (Scientific Commitee on Antarctic Research). 2004. Strategic plan 2004–2010. Cambridge: SCAR (Special Report).Google Scholar
SCAR (Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research). 2007. Achievements of SCAR to 2006. Cambridge: SCAR (Report 29).Google Scholar
Stonehouse, B. 2002. Encyclopedia of Antarctica and the Southern Oceans. Chichester: J. Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Sullivan, W. 1961. Assault on the unknown: the International Geophysical Year. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Summerhayes, C.P., Dickson, B., Meredith, M., Dexter, P., and Alverson, K.. 2007. Observing the polar oceans during the International Polar Year and beyond. WMO Bulletin 56 (4)270–283Google Scholar
Weyprecht, C. 1875a. Scientific work of the second Austro-Hungarian polar expedition, 1872–4. Journal of the Royal Geographical Society of London 45: 19–33 (translated from Geographische Mittheilungen 31)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyprecht, C. 1875b. Fundamental principles of scientific Arctic investigation. Graz (An address delivered before the 46th meeting of German Naturalists and Physicians).Google Scholar
Wilczek, J.N., and Weyprecht, C.. 1877. Programme des travaux d'une expédition polaire internationale. Vienna: W. Stein (Paper submitted to the second International Meteorological Congress, Rome).Google Scholar
Willett, R.W. 1967. Geology. Oxford: Pergamon (Annals of the International Geophysical Year 44): 53–65.Google Scholar
Wilson, J.T. 1961. IGY: the year of the new moons (foreword L.V. Berkner). London: Michael Joseph.Google Scholar
Wood, K.R., and Overland, J.E.. 2006. Climate lessons from the first International Polar Year. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 87 (12): 1685–1697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woollard, G.P. 1967. Continental structure of Antarctica. Oxford: Pergamon (Annals of the International Geophysical Year 44): 122–143.Google Scholar
Zumberge, J.H. 1987. The Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research. Introduction. In: Fifield, R. (editor). International research in the Antarctic. Oxford: Oxford University Press (SCAR/ICSU Press, Oxford Scientific Publications): 1–8.Google Scholar