Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T17:17:44.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remote sensing, a tool for reindeer range land management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Alfred Colpaert ,
Jouko Kumpula  and
Mauri Nieminen
Alfred Colpaert
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Oulu, Linnanmaa, 90570 Oulu, Finland
Jouko Kumpula
Affiliation:
Sudentie 12 B6, 96500 Rovaniemi, Finland
Mauri Nieminen
Affiliation:
Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute, Reindeer Research Station, 99910 Kaamanen, Finland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Finnish reindeer-herding area lies in the northern boreal forest zone. The herding area is divided into 57 reindeer management districts with a total area of 114,355 km2 (excluding water areas). The official number of reindeer in the year 1992 was 263,789, or 2.3 reindeer per square kilometre. In 1946 the density was only about one reindeer per square kilometre. The increased pressure on the mid-winter lichen pastures has reduced the volume of lichen. Also the decreased area of old coniferous forests with arboreal lichens has diminished the supply of food during the late-winter months. The lack of suitable winter pastures has led to the need for supplementary feeding with hay.

The intention of this study was to develop and test methods for cost-effective reindeer range land inventory and to assess the present state of pastures in seven districts. Use was made of Landsat 5 TM satellite imagery that was processed with remote sensing and GIS software. The analysis of well-known field sites proved the image classification to be between 80 and 90% accurate. By comparing field data and classification results, estimates can be made on the available fodder reserves in the different pasture types. The results show that mid-winter pastures are both scarce and degraded in six of the seven areas investigated. Only one area (Muotkatunturi) has mid-winter pastures in reasonably good condition. Late-winter pastures with arboreal lichens are more widespread than mid-winter pastures and determine the amount of additional winter feeding required. Summer pastures are abundant in all seven reindeer-herding districts and are therefore not a limiting factor. The method used is objective, inexpensive, and fast when compared to conventional methods. Information can be produced on the quantity and quality of reindeer pastures. This knowledge can be used to make better estimates of the natural grazing capacity of reindeer districts in Finland.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 31 , Issue 177 , April 1995 , pp. 235 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boresjö, L. 1989. Multi-temporal analysis of satellite data for vegetation mapping in Sweden. Meddelanden fràn Naturgeografiska Institutionen vid Stockholms Universitet A 233.Google Scholar
Clifford, B. 1979. Reindeer range and the satellite. Soil Conservation 45: 4–5.Google Scholar
Colpaert, A. 1993. Land use mapping with Landsat 5 TM imagery: a case study from Hailuoto, Finland. Fennia 171 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
George, T.H. 1981. Reindeer range inventory: use of winter Landsat imagery for stratification of digital classification. In: Tendam, I.M., and Morrison, D.B. (editors). Proceedings of the Symposium on Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers: 416–427.Google Scholar
Haukioja, E., and Heino, J.. 1974. Birch consumption by reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) in Finnish Lapland. Reports from the Kevo Subarctic Research Station, Turku 11: 22–25.Google Scholar
Heikkinen, O. 1988. Human impact on the forest in Finland. In: Jyvälä, K., and Koutaniemi, L. (editors). Environment and human life in Nordic countries: proceedings of a symposium on the high-latitude zones, Oulu, 1–6 June 1987. Publicationes Instituti Geograhica Ouluensis 109: 17–25.Google Scholar
Heino, R., and Hellsten, E.. 1983. Climatological statistics in Finland 1961–1980. In: Meteorological yearbook of Finland: supplement. Helsinki: Finnish Meteorological Institute: 80 (1a).Google Scholar
Helle, R. 1966. An investigation of reindeer husbandry in Finland. Fennia 95 (4): 1–65.Google Scholar
Helle, T. 1980. The winter use of food resources of semidomestic reindeer in northern Finland. Helsinki: Finnish Forest Research Institute (Publication 95).Google Scholar
Helle, T. 1984. Foraging behaviour of the semi-domestic reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L.) in relation to snow in Finnish Lapland. Reports from the Kevo Subarctic Research Station, Turku 19: 35–47.Google Scholar
Helle, T., and Aspi, J.. 1984. Do sandy patches help reindeer against insects? Reports from the Kevo Subarctic Research Station, Turku 19: 57–62.Google Scholar
Helle, T., Aspi, J., and Tarvainen, L.. 1983. The growth rate of Cladonia rangiferina and C. mitis in relation to forest characteristics in northeastern Finland. Rangifer 3 (2): 2–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hämet-Ahti, L. 1988. Biogeography, nature conservation. In: Alalammi, P. (editor). Atlas of Finland. Helsinki: National Land Survey of Finland: 141–148.Google Scholar
Janssen, L., and van der Wel, F.. 1994. Accuracy assessment of satellite derived land cover data: a review. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 60 (4): 419–426.Google Scholar
Johansen, B.E., and Tømmervik, H.. 1990. Mapping winter pastures for reindeer in Karasjok, northern Norway, using Landsat 5-TM data. Rangifer Special issue 4: 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koutaniemi, L. 1982. The relationship between relative height and microrelief: three case studies from northern Finland. Fennia 160 (2): 272–294.Google Scholar
Kumpula, J., and Nieminen, M.. 1992. Pastures, calf production and carcass weights of reindeer calves in the Oraniemi co-operative, Finnish Lapland. Rangifer 12 (2): 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattila, E. 1988. The winter ranges of the Finnish reindeer management area. Folia Forestalia 713: 3–53.Google Scholar
Mattila, E., and Helle, T.. 1978. Keskisen poronhoitoalueen talvilaidunten inventointi. Folia Forestalia 358: 3–31.Google Scholar
Nenonen, S., and Nieminen, M.. 1990. The inventory of reindeer winter pastures in Muotkatunturi co-operative with satellite imageries and colour infrared photographs. Rangifer Special issue 4: 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieminen, M., and Heiskari, U.. 1989. Diets of freely grazing and captive reindeer during summer and winter. Rangifer 9 (1): 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieminen, P., and Nieminen, M.. 1983. Some estimated effects of the planned harnessing of the Ounasjoki River on reindeer husbandry. Rangifer 3 (2): 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G.W., and Cochran, W.G.. 1967. Statistical methods. Ames, IO: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Sulkava, S., and Helle, T.. 1975. Range ecology of the domesticated reindeer in the Finnish coniferous forest area. In: Luick, J.R., Lent, D.C., Klein, D.R., and White, R.G. (editors). Proceedings of the First International Reindeer/Caribou Symposium, Fairbanks Alaska. Fairbanks: University of Alaska (Biological Papers of the University of Alaska, Special Number 1): 108–121.Google Scholar
Tømmervik, H., and Lauknes, I.. 1987. Mapping of reindeer ranges in the Kautokeino area, northern Norway, by use of Landsat 5-TM data. Rangifer 7 (2): 2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tømmervik, H., and Lauknes, I.. 1988. Inventory of reindeer winter pastures by use of Landsat 5-TM data. In: Remote sensing: moving towards the 21st century: proceedings of IGARSS '88 symposium, Edinburgh, Scotland, 13–16 September 1988. Noordwijk: European Space Agency Publications Division (ESA SP-284): II, 1223.Google Scholar