Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-mpvvr Total loading time: 0.265 Render date: 2021-08-04T07:29:33.004Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Crossing the Boundaries: An Implementation of Two Methods for Projecting Data across Boundary Changes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Max Goplerud
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Department of Government, e-mail: goplerud@g.harvard.edu
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Extract

Much of the data used in social science is aggregated into spatial units, even if the analysis itself does not explicitly incorporate that information. A key concern with such aggregation, however, is that changes in the units of aggregation themselves cause difficulty in comparing data gathered on the old boundaries and the new boundaries. Such changes present serious concerns to researchers who may exclude observations or cases due to a lack of comparable units or omit certain key variables. While geographers have long examined this problem and created methods of projecting data from one spatial unit into another, known as areal interpolation, it is telling that a recent article notes the difficulty for researchers in implementing even the most basic solutions without relying heavily on programming skills or proprietary software.

Type
Letter
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fisher, P. F., and Langford, M. 1995. Modelling the errors in areal interpolation between zonal systems by Monte Carlo simulation. Environment and Planning A 27(2): 211–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goplerud, M. 2015. Replication data for: Crossing the boundaries: An implementation of two methods for projecting data across boundary changes. http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/MVIQUD, Harvard Dataverse, V1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotway Crawford, C. A., and Young, L. J. 2004. A spatial view of the ecological inference problem. In Ecological inference: New methodological strategies, eds. King, G., Rosen, O., and Tanner, M. A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, I. 2002. The accuracy of areal interpolation techniques: standardising 19th- and 20th-century census data to allow long-term comparisons. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 26(4): 293314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lam, N. S.-N. 1983. Spatial interpolation methods: A review. American Cartographer 10(2): 129–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Openshaw, S. 1984. The modifiable areal unit problem. Number No. 28 in concepts and techniques in modern geography. Norwich: Geo Books.Google Scholar
Qiu, F., Zhang, C., and Zhou, Y. 2012. The development of an areal interpolation ArcGIS extension and a comparative study. GIScience & Remote Sensing 49(5): 644–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rallings, C., and Thrasher, M. 2007. Media guide to the new parliamentary constituencies. Plymouth: Local Government Chronicle Elections Centre.Google Scholar
Sadahiro, Y. 1999. Accuracy of areal interpolation: A comparison of alternative methods. Journal of Geographical Systems 1(4): 323–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadahiro, Y 2000. Accuracy of count data estimated by the point-in-polygon method. Geographical Analysis 32(1): 6489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobler, W. R. 1979. Smooth pycnophylactic interpolation for geographical regions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74(367): 519–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhang, C., and Qiu, F. 2011. A point-based intelligent approach to areal interpolation. Professional Geographer 63(2): 262–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Goplerud Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Goplerud Supplementary Material(File)
File 1 MB
5
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Crossing the Boundaries: An Implementation of Two Methods for Projecting Data across Boundary Changes
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Crossing the Boundaries: An Implementation of Two Methods for Projecting Data across Boundary Changes
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Crossing the Boundaries: An Implementation of Two Methods for Projecting Data across Boundary Changes
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *