Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T04:35:57.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Influence of Emotion on Trust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

C. Daniel Myers*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Dustin Tingley
Affiliation:
Department of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 e-mail: dtingley@gov.harvard.edu
*

Abstract

Political scientists frequently wish to test hypotheses about the effects of specific emotions on political behavior. However, commonly used experimental manipulations tend to have collateral effects on emotions other than the targeted emotion, making it difficult to ascribe outcomes to any single emotion. In this letter, we propose to address this problem using causal mediation analysis. We illustrate this approach using an experiment examining the effect of emotion on dyadic trust, as measured by the trust game. Our findings suggest that negative emotions can decrease trust, but only if those negative emotions make people feel less certain about their current situation. Our results suggest that only anxiety, a low-certainty emotion, has a negative impact on trust, whereas anger and guilt, two emotions that differ in their control appraisals but induce the same high level of certainty, appear to have no effect on trusting behavior. Importantly, we find that failing to use causal mediation analysis would ascribe a positive effect of anxiety on trust, demonstrating the value of this approach.

Type
Symposium on Methods for Emotion Experiments
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Authors' note: Replication data are available on the Harvard Dataverse at http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/EBBP1O. See Myers and Tingley (2016). Supplementary materials for this article are available on the Political Analysis Web site. The authors thank Rebecca Morton, Shana Gadarian, Bethany Albertson, participants in the Southern Political Science Association 2011 Mini-Conference on Experimental Methods, several anonymous reviewers, and the editors of this symposium for their helpful comments. This research was supported by a grant from the Princeton Laboratory for Experimental Social Science.

References

Albertson, B., Gadarian, and S. K. 2015. Anxious politics: Democratic citizenship in a threatening world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, G. A., Verba, and S. 1963. The Civic Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., McCabe, and K. 1995. Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior 10:122–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capra, C. M. 2004. Mood-driven behavior in strategic interactions. AEA Papers and Proceedings 94:367–72.Google Scholar
Cesarini, D., Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., Johannesson, M., Lichtenstein, P., Wallace, and B. 2008. Heritability of cooperative behavior in the trust game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105:3721–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeSteno, D., Dasgupta, N., Bartlett, M. Y., Cajdric, and A. 2004. Prejudice from thin air: The effect of emotion on automatic intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science 15:319–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, J. R., Schweitzer, and M. E. 2005. Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion on trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88:736–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gadarian, S. K. 2010. The politics of threat: How terrorism news shapes foreign policy attitudes. The Journal of Politics 72:469–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, E. L., Laibson, D. I., Scheinkman, J. A., Soutter, and C. L. 2000. Measuring trust. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 13:811–46.Google Scholar
Imai, K., Keele, L., Tingley, and D. 2010a. A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods 15:309–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, K., Keele, L., Tingley, D., Yamamoto, and T. 2011. Unpacking the black box: Learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. American Political Science Review 105:765–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, K., Keele, L., Tingley, D., Yamamoto, and T. 2014. Practical implications of theoretical results for causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods 19:488–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imai, K., Keele, L., Yamamoto, and T. 2010b. Identification, inference, and sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects. Statistical Science 25:5171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, K., Yamamoto, and T. 2013. Identification and sensitivity analysis for multiple causal mechanisms: Revisiting evidence from framing experiments. Political Analysis 21:141–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, N. D., Mislin, and A. A. 2011. Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology 32:865–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keltner, D., Locke, K. D., Aurain, and P. C. 1993. The influence of attributions on the relevance of negative feelings to personal satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 19:2129.Google Scholar
Lerner, J. S., Keltner, and D. 2000. Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgment and choice. Cognition and Emotion 14:473–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, C., and D’Mello, S. 2014. On the validity of the autobiographical emotional memory task for emotion induction. PLOS One 9:e95837.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mislin, A., Williams, L. V., Shaughnessy, and B. A. 2015. Motivating trust: Can mood and incentives increase interpersonal trust? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 58:1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, D. C., Tingley, and D. 2016. The influence of emotion on trust. http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/EBBP1O, Harvard Dataverse, v1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renshon, J., Lee, J. J., Tingley, and D. 2015. Physiological arousal and political beliefs. Political Psychology 36:569585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. A., Ellsworth, and P. C. 1985. Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48:813–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strack, F., Schwarz, N., Gschneidinger, and E. 1985. Happiness and reminiscing: The role of time perspective, affect, and mode of thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49:1460–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, J. L., Transue, and J. E. 1999. The psychological underpinnings of democracy: A selective review of research on political tolerance, interpersonal trust, and social capital. Annual Review of Psychology 50:625–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., Banks, and A. J. 2008. Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the internet. Political Psychology 29:247–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, and L. A. 1999. The PANAS-x: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule - expanded form. Typescript, University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. K., Eckel, and C. C. 2011. Trust and social exchange. In Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, eds. Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., Lupia, and A. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Myers and Tingley Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Myers and Tingley Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 162.9 KB