Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-6c8bd87754-x25dq Total loading time: 0.252 Render date: 2022-01-19T18:13:24.767Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Time Series Intervals and Statistical Inference: The Effects of Temporal Aggregation on Event Data Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Stephen M. Shellman*
Affiliation:
Department of Government, The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795. e-mail: smshel@wm.edu

Abstract

While many areas of research in political science draw inferences from temporally aggregated data, rarely have researchers explored how temporal aggregation biases parameter estimates. With some notable exceptions (Freeman 1989, Political Analysis 1:61–98; Alt et al. 2001, Political Analysis 9:21–44; Thomas 2002, “Event Data Analysis and Threats from Temporal Aggregation”) political science studies largely ignore how temporal aggregation affects our inferences. This article expands upon others' work on this issue by assessing the effect of temporal aggregation decisions on vector autoregressive (VAR) parameter estimates, significance levels, Granger causality tests, and impulse response functions. While the study is relevant to all fields in political science, the results directly apply to event data studies of conflict and cooperation. The findings imply that political scientists should be wary of the impact that temporal aggregation has on statistical inference.

Type
Replications and Extensions
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Political Methodology 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alt, James, King, Gary, and Signorino, Curtis S. 2001. “Aggregation among Binary, Count and Duration Models: Estimating the Same Quantities from Different Levels of Data.” Political Analysis 9: 2144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azar, Edward E. 1982. The Codebook of the Conflict and Peace Data Bank (COPDAB). Unpublished. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Dixon, William J. 1988. “The Discrete Sequential Analysis of Dynamic International Behavior.” Quality and Quantity 22: 239254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enders, Walter. 1995. Applied Econometric Time Series. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Franzosi, Roberto. 1995. The Puzzle of Strikes: Class and State Strategies in Postwar Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, John R. 1989. “Systematic Sampling, Temporal Aggregation, and the Study of Political Relationships.” Political Analysis 1: 6198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua S. 1991. “Reciprocity in Superpower Relations: An Empirical Analysis.” International Studies Quarterly 35: 195210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua S. 1992. “A Conflict-Cooperation Scale for WEIS Events Data.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36: 369385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua S., and Freeman, John R. 1990. Three-Way Street: Strategic Reciprocity in World Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Granger, C. W. J., and Siklos, Pierre L. 1995. “Systematic Sampling, Temporal Aggregation, Seasonal Adjustment, and Cointegration: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Econometrics 66: 357369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeds, Brett Ashley, Davis, David R., Moore, Will H., and McHorney, Christopher. 1995. The Intranational Political Interactions (IPI) Codebook. (Available from http://garnet.acns.fsu.edu/∼whmoore/ipi/codebook.html.)Google Scholar
Marcellino, Massimiliano. 1999. “Some Consequences of Temporal Aggregation in Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 17: 129136.Google Scholar
Moore, Will H. 1998. “Repression and Dissent: Substitution, Context, and Timing.” American Journal of Political Science 42: 851873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierse, R. G., and Snell, A. J. 1995. “Temporal Aggregation and the Power of Tests for a Unit Root.” Journal of Econometrics 65: 333345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossana, Robert J., and Seater, John J. 1995. “Temporal Aggregation and Economic Time Series.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 13: 441451.Google Scholar
Shellman, Stephen M. 2003. “Taking Turns: A Theory of Government-Dissident Interactions.” Unpublished dissertation. Tallahassee: Florida State University.Google Scholar
Shellman, Stephen M. 2004. “Measuring the Intensity of Intranational Political Interactions Events Data: Two Interval-like Scales.” International Interactions in press.Google Scholar
Sims, C. A. 1971. “Discrete Approximations to Continuous Time Distributed Lags in Econometrics.” Econometrica 39: 545563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, C. A. 1980. “Macroeconomics and Reality.” Econometrica 48: 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, G. Dale. 2002. “Event Data Analysis and Threats from Temporal Aggregation.” Presented at the Florida Political Science Association Meeting, Sarasota, FL, March 8.Google Scholar
Wei, William W.S. 1982. “The Effects of Systematic Sampling and Temporal Aggregation on Causality—A Cautionary Note.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 77: 316319.Google Scholar
Zellner, Arnold, and Montmarquette, Claude. 1971. “A Study of Some Aspects of Temporal Aggregation Problems in Econometric Analyses.” Review of Economics and Statistics 53: 335342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Shellman supplementary material

Supplementary Material

Download Shellman supplementary material(File)
File 384 KB
41
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Time Series Intervals and Statistical Inference: The Effects of Temporal Aggregation on Event Data Analysis
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Time Series Intervals and Statistical Inference: The Effects of Temporal Aggregation on Event Data Analysis
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Time Series Intervals and Statistical Inference: The Effects of Temporal Aggregation on Event Data Analysis
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *