Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:37:53.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Errors-in-Variables Approach to Estimating Models with Small Area Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

John E. Jackson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Many important social science models are estimated with subnational units, such as states, congressional districts, or counties as the units of observation. These analyses may require estimates of population characteristics for these units that are not readily available from published sources. Frequently the size and number of these units make direct data collection, such as household surveys, prohibitively expensive or completely infeasible. The need is to develop methods for using more readily available data to estimate these subgroup attributes. This article presents such a method based on national-level survey data.

Type
Research Article
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 1 , 1989 , pp. 157 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © by the University of Michigan 1990 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, Christopher H. 1975. “Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response.” American Political Science Review 69: 1218–31.Google Scholar
Davis, Otto A., and Jackson, John E. 1974. “Senate Defeat of the Family Assistance Plan.” Public Policy 22: 245–73.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. 1979. “The SRC Panel Data and Mass Political Attitudes: Change and Uncertainty.” British Journal of Political Science 9: 89–114.Google Scholar
Hanushek, Eric A., and Jackson, John E. 1977. Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, Michael R., and Jackson, John E. 1987. “The Individual Political Economy of Federal Tax Policy.” American Political Science Review 81: 757–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, John E. 1983. “The Systematic Beliefs of the Mass Public: Estimating Policy Preferences with Survey Data.” Journal of Politics 45: 840–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, John E., and King, David C. 1989. “Public Goods, Private Interests, and Representation.” American Political Science Review. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Roderick Kiewiet, D. 1981. “Sociotropic Voting: The American Case.” British Journal of Political Science 11: 129–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, Paul E. 1977. “The Selfish Voter Paradox and the Thrown-Away Vote Argument.” American Political Science Review 71: 11–30.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57: 45–56.Google Scholar
Sears, David O., Hensler, C. P., and Speer, L. K. 1979. “Whites’ Opposition to Busing: Self-interest or Symbolic Racism?” American Political Science Review 73: 369–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O., Lau, R. R., Tyler, T., and Allen, H. M. Jr. 1980. “Self-interest versus Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting.” American Political Science Review 74: 670–84.Google Scholar
Waldron, Steven A., and Henton, Douglas C. 1988. “California.” In The New Economics Role of American States, ed. Scott Fosler, R. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Ronald E., ed. 1976. Public Opinion and American State Politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar