Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-fz5kh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-03T22:18:08.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of the Dynamics of Political Reasoning: A General-Purpose Computer-Assisted Methodology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Thomas Piazza ,
Paul M. Sniderman  and
Philip E. Tetlock
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this article is to present a methodology for better gauging the nature and dynamics of social and political attitudes. Starting from a particular view of attitude assessment, we show how computer-assisted interviewing can help transform the survey interview from a passive to an interactive process. Since the ultimate test of a methodological approach is its substantive yield, we shall present both specific measurement procedures and illustrative substantive results. The methodology itself, however, is quite general and readily applied to other substantive areas, thanks both to the generality of the theory of measurement of which it is a part and to the flexibility of the technology in which it is embedded.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 1 , 1989 , pp. 99 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © by the University of Michigan 1990 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abelson, Robert P., Aronson, Elliot, McGuire, William J., Newcomb, Theodore M., Rosenberg, Milton J., and Tannenbaum, Percy H. 1968. Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald T. 1963. “Social Attitudes and Other Acquired Behavioral Dispositions.” In Psychology: A Study of a Science, ed. Koch, Sigmund. Vol. 6. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, Ill.: Peterson.Google Scholar
Jackman, Mary R. 1978. “General and Applied Tolerance: Does Education Increase Commitment to Racial Integration.” American Journal of Political Science 22: 302–24.Google Scholar
Jackman, Mary R. 1981. “Education and Policy Commitment to Racial Integration.” American Journal of Political Science 25: 256–69.Google Scholar
Jackman, Mary R., and Muhe, M. J. 1984. “Education and Intergroup Attitudes: Moral Enlightenment, Superficial Democratic Commitment, or Ideological Refinement?” American Sociological Review 49: 751–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R. 1986. “The Continuing American Dilemma: White Resistance to Racial Change 40 Years After Myrdal.” Journal of Social Issues 42: 151–72.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Sears, David O. 1981. “Prejudice and Politics: Symbolic Racism versus Racial Threats to the Good Life.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40: 414–31.Google Scholar
Kish, Leslie. 1987. Statistical Design for Research. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
La Piere, R. T. 1934. “Attitudes vs. Actions.” Social Forces 13: 230–37.Google Scholar
Lewin, Kurt. 1936. A Dynamic Theory of Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
McConahay, John B. 1986. “Modern Racism, Ambivalence and the Modern Racism Scale.” In Prejudice, Discrimination and Racism, ed. Dovidio, John F. and Gaertner, Samuel L. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McGuire, William J. 1964. “Inducing Resistance to Persuasion: Some Contemporary Approaches.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. Berkowitz, Leonard. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McGuire, William J. 1968. “Personality and Susceptibility to Social Influence.” In Handbook of Personality Theory and Research, ed. Borgatta, Edgar F. and Lambert, William W. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Petty, Richard E., and Cacioppo, John. 1986. “The Elaboration-Likelihood Model of Persuasion.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. Berkowitz, Leonard. Vol. 19. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rossi, Peter H., and Nock, Steven L., eds. 1982. Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Schuman, Howard, and Presser, Stanley. 1981. Questions and Answers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schuman, Howard, Steeh, Charlotte, and Bobo, Lawrence. 1985. Racial Attitudes in America: Trends and Interpretations. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shanks, J. Merrill. 1988. “Information Technology and Survey Research: Where Do We Go From Here.” Computer-assisted Survey Methods Program, University of California, Berkeley, Mimeo.Google Scholar
Shanks, J. Merrill, and Tortora, Robert D. 1985. “Beyond CATI: Generalized and Distributed Systems for Computer-Assisted Surveys.” Prepared for the Bureau of the Census, First Annual Research Conference, Reston, VA.Google Scholar
Shanks, J. Merrill, Sanchez, Maria, and Morton, Betsy. 1983. “Alternative Approaches to Survey Data Collection for the National Election Studies: A Report on the 1982 NES Method Comparison Project.” Prepared for the U.S. National Election Studies.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., and Tetlock, Philip E. 1986. “Political Ideology and Public Opinion.” In Political Psychology, ed. Hermann, Margaret G. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Fletcher, Joseph F., Russell, Peter H., and Tetlock, Philip E. 1988. “Liberty, Authority and Community: Civil Liberties and the Canadian Political Culture.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Windsor, Ont.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Fletcher, Joseph F., Russell, Peter H., and Tetlock, Philip E. N.d. “Political Culture and the Problem of Double Standards: Mass and Elite Attitudes toward Language Rights in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.” Canadian Journal of Political Science. In press.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Hagen, Michael Gray, Tetlock, Philip E., and Brady, Henry E. 1986. “Reasoning Chains: Causal Models of Racial Policy Reasoning.” British Journal of Political Science 16:(4) 405–30.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Tetlock, Philip E., Glaser, James M., Green, Donald Philip, and Hout, Michael. N.d. “Principled Tolerance and American Political Values.” British Journal of Political Science. In press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, John L., Piereson, James E., and Marcus, George E. 1978. “Ideological Constraint in the Mass Public: A Methodological Critique and Some New Findings.” American Journal of Political Science 22: 233–49.Google Scholar
Williams, Robin. 1988. “Racial Attitudes and Behavior.” In Surveying Social Life, ed. O’Gorman, Hubert J. Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1984. “Toward a Theory of the Survey Response.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar