Adams, J., Merrill, S., and Grofman, B.
2005. A unified theory of party competition: A cross-national analysis integrating spatial and behavioral factors. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Aldrich, J., and McKelvey, R.
1977. A method of scaling with applications to the 1968 and 1972 presidential elections. American Political Science Review
Alvarez, R., and Nagler, J.
2004. Party system compactness: Measurement and consequences. Political Analysis
Bafumi, J., and Herron, M.
2010. Leapfrog representation and extremism: A study of American voters and their members in Congress. American Political Science Review
2007. Comparable preference estimates across time and institutions for the court, Congress, and presidency. American Journal of Political Science
Bawn, K., and Somer-Topcu, Z.
2012. Government versus opposition at the polls: How governing status affects the impact of policy positions. American Journal of Political Science
Benoit, K., and Laver, M.
2005. Mapping the Irish policy space: Voter and party spaces in preferential elections. Economic and Social Review
Benoit, K., and Laver, M.
2006. Party policy in modern democracies. London: Routledge.
Benoit, K., and McElroy, G.
2007. Party groups and policy positions in the European Parliament. Party Politics
Bergara, M., Richman, B., and Spiller, P.
2003. Modeling Supreme Court strategic decision making: The Congressional constraint. Legislative Studies Quarterly
Blais, A., Nadeau, R., Gidengil, E., and Nevitte, N.
2001. The formation of party preferences: Testing the proximity and directional models. European Journal of Political Research
Brady, H. E.
1985. The perils of survey research: Inter-personally incomparable responses. Political Methodology
11 (3–4): 269–91.
Calvo, E., and Hellwig, T.
2011. Centripetal and centrifugal incentives under different electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science
Campbell, D., and Fiske, D.
1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin
Carroll, R., Lewis, J. B., Lo, J., Poole, K. T., and Rosenthal, H.
2009. Measuring bias and uncertainty in DW-NOMINATE ideal point estimates via the parametric bootstrap. Political Analysis
Dalton, R., Farrell, D., and McAllister, I.
2011. Political parties and democratic linkage: How parties organize democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Vries, C.
2007. Sleeping giant: Fact or fairytale?
European Union Politics
1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.
Duch, R., May, J., and Armstrong, D. II. 2010. Coalition-directed voting in multi-party democracies. American Political Science Review
Duch, R., and Stevenson, R.
2008. The economic vote: How political and economic institutions condition election results. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
EES. 2011. European Parliament election study, voter data, advance release (23 June 2011). www.piredeu.eu.
Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R.
1994. An introduction to the bootstrap. London: Chapman and Hall.
Egmond, M., Sapir, E., van der Brug, W., Hobolt, S., and Franklin, M.
2010. EES 2009 voter study: Advance release notes. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
Enelow, J. M., and Hinich, M.
1984. The spatial theory of voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Erikson, R. S., and Romero, D. W.
1990. Candidate equilibrium and the behavioral model of the vote. American Political Science Review
2010. Linking citizens and parties: How electoral systems matter for political representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gerber, E., and Lewis, J.
2004. Beyond the median: Voter preferences, district heterogeneity, and political representation. Journal of Political Economy
Golder, M., and Stramski, J.
2010. Ideological congruence and electoral institutions. American Journal of Political Science
Groseclose, T., Levitt, S., and Snyder, J.
1999. Comparing interest group scores across time and chambers: Adjusted ADA scores for the US Congress. American Political Science Review
Hinich, M., and Munger, M. C.
1994. Ideology and the theory of political choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Hix, S., Noury, A., and Roland, G.
2007. Democratic politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hobolt, S. B., Spoon, J.-J., and Tilley, J.
2009. A vote against Europe? Explaining defection at the 1999 and 2004 European Parliament elections. British Journal of Political Science
Hooghe, L., Bakker, R., Brigevich, A., de Vries, C., Edwards, E., Marks, G., Rovny, J., and Steenbergen, M.
2010. Reliability and validity of measuring party positions: The Chapel Hill expert surveys of 2002 and 2006. European Journal of Political Research
Jessee, S. A.
2009. Spatial voting in the 2004 presidential election. American Political Science Review
2005. When moderate voters prefer extreme parties: Policy balancing parliamentary elections. American Political Science Review
King, G., Murray, C., Salomon, J., and Tandon, A.
2004. Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of survey research. American Political Science Review
Lewis, J. B., and Poole, K. T.
2004. Measuring bias and uncertainty in ideal point estimates via the parametric bootstrap. Political Analysis
Lo, J., Proksch, S.-O., and Gschwend, T.
2013. Replication data for: A common left-right scale for voters and parties in Europe. http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/23113 (accessed November 8, 2013).
Macdonald, S. E., Listhaug, O., and Rabinowitz, G.
1991. Issues and party support in multyparty systems. American Political Science Review
Mair, P., and Mudde, C.
1998. The party family and its study. Annual Review of Political Science
Markus, G. B., and Converse, P. E.
1979. A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice. 73 (4): 1055–70.
McElroy, G., and Benoit, K.
2010. Party policy and group affiliation in the European Parliament. British Journal of Political Science
McElroy, G., and Benoit, K.
2012. Policy positioning in the European Parliament. European Union Politics
1973. Conditional logit analysis of qualitatative choice behavior. In Frontiers of Economics, ed. Zarembka, P.
New York: Academic Press.
Palfrey, T., and Poole, K.
1987. The relationship between information, ideology, and voting behavior. American Journal of Political Science
Peterson, D. A. M.
2009. Campaign learning and vote determinants. American Journal of Political Science
2005. Spatial models of parliamentary voting. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Poole, K. T., and Rosenthal, H.
1997. Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Poole, K., Rosenthal, H., Lewis, J., Lo, J., and Carroll, R.
2011. Recovering a basic space in R. Working paper.
2000. Elections as instruments of democracy: Majoritarian and proportional visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2004. Bayesian factor analysis for mixed ordinal continuous response. Political Analysis
Rabinowitz, G., and Macdonald, S. E.
1989. A directional theory of issue voting. American Political Science Review
Rehm, P., and Reilly, T.
2010. United we stand: Constituency homogeneity and comparative party polarization. Electoral Studies
Reif, K., and Schmitt, H.
1980. Nine second-order national elections. A conceptual framework for the analysis of european election results. European Journal of Political Research
2009. Recovering a basic space from elite surveys: Evidence from Latin America. Legislative Studies Quarterly
Shor, B., Berry, C., and McCarty, N.
2010. A bridge to somewhere: Mapping state and congressional ideology on a cross-institutional common space. Legislative Studies Quarterly
Shor, B., and McCarty, N.
2011. The ideological mapping of American legislatures. American Political Science Review
2010. Where does the president stand? Measuring presidential ideology. Political Analysis
1997. Distance versus direction: The illusory defeat of the proximity theory of electoral choice. American Political Science Review