Skip to main content Accessibility help

A Continuous-Time, Latent-Variable Model of Time Series Data

  • Alexander M. Tahk (a1)


Many types of time series data in political science, including polling data and events data, exhibit important features'such as irregular spacing, noninstantaneous observation, overlapping observation times, and sampling or other measurement error'that are ignored in most statistical analyses because of model limitations. Ignoring these properties can lead not only to biased coefficients but also to incorrect inference about the direction of causality. This article develops a continuous-time model to overcome these limitations. This new model treats observations as noisy samples collected over an interval of time and can be viewed as a generalization of the vector autoregressive model. Monte Carlo simulations and two empirical examples demonstrate the importance of modeling these features of the data.



Hide All
Armstrong, D. A. II 2009. Measuring the democracy-repression nexus. Electoral Studies 28(3): 403–12.
Beck, N. 1989. Estimating dynamic models using Kalman filtering. Political Analysis 1(1): 121–56.
Berardo, R., and Scholz, J. T. 2010. Self-organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries. American Journal of Political Science 54(3): 632–49.
Berlemann, M., and Enkelmann, S. 2012. The economic determinants of U.S. presidential approval—A survey. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2029449, Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY.
Bond, J. R., Fleisher, R., and Wood, B. D. 2003. The marginal and time-varying effect of public approval on presidential success in Congress. Journal of Politics 65(1): 92110.
Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., and Jones, B. S. 1997. Time is of the essence: Event history models in political science. American Journal of Political Science 41(4): 1414–61.
Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., and Jones, B. S. 2004. Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brandt, P. T., and Freeman, J. R. 2006. Advances in Bayesian time series modeling and the study of politics: Theory testing, forecasting, and policy analysis. Political Analysis 14(1): 136.
Brandt, P. T., and Freeman, J. R. 2009. Modeling macro-political dynamics. Political Analysis 17(2): 113–42.
Brandt, P. T., and Williams, J. T. 2001. A linear Poisson autoregressive model: The Poisson AR( p) model. Political Analysis 9(2): 164–84.
Brandt, P. T., Williams, J. T., Fordham, B. O., and Pollins, B. 2000. Dynamic modeling for persistent event-count time series. American Journal of Political Science 44(4):823.
Brockwell, P. J. 2001. Continuous-time ARMA processes. In Stochastic Processes: Theory and Methods, Volume 19, of Handbook of Statistics, eds. Shanbhag, D. N. and Rao, C. R., 149276. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Burden, B. C., and Mughan, A. 2003. The international economy and presidential approval. Public Opinion Quarterly 67(4): 555–78.
Carlin, R. E., Love, G. J., Martínez-Gallardo, C. Forthcoming. Cushioning the fall: Scandals, economic conditions, and executive approval. Political Behavior. doi:10.1007/s11109-014-9267-3.
Carpenter, D. 2003. Why do bureaucrats delay? In Politics, Policy, and Organizations: Frontiers in the Study of Bureaucracy 2003, eds. Krause, G. A. and Meier, K. J., 2340. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Commandeur, J. J., and Koopman, S. J. 2007. An Introduction to State Space Time Series Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Boef, S., and Keele, L. 2008. Taking time seriously. American Journal of Political Science 52(1): 184200.
Durbin, J., and Koopman, S. J. 2012. Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Enns, P. K. 2014. The public's increasing punitiveness and its influence on mass incarceration in the United States. American Journal of Political Science 58:857–72.
Fearon, J. D. 1994. Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review 88(03): 577–92.
Fearon, J. D. 1998. Bargaining, enforcement, and international cooperation. International Organization 52(02): 269305.
Freeman, J. R. 1989. Systematic sampling, temporal aggregation, and the study of political relationships. Political Analysis 1(1): 6198.
Freeman, J. R., Williams, J. T., and Lin, T. 1989, November. Vector autoregression and the study of politics. American Journal of Political Science 33(4): 842–77.
Fuller, W. A. 1976. Introduction to Statistical Time Series. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Goldstein, J. S. 1992. A conflict-cooperation scale for WEIS events data. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36(2): 369–85.
Goldstein, J. S., and Pevehouse, J. C. 1997. Reciprocity, bullying, and international cooperation: Time series analysis of the Bosnia conflict. American Political Science Review 91(3): 515–29.
Green, D. P., Gerber, A. S., and Boef, S. L. d. 1999. Tracking opinion over time: A method for reducing sampling error. Public Opinion Quarterly 63(2): 178–92.
Gronke, P., and Brehm, J. 2002. History, heterogeneity, and presidential approval: A modified ARCH approach. Electoral Studies 21(3): 425–52.
Hänggi, P., and Marchesoni, F. 2005. Introduction: 100 years of Brownian motion. Chaos 15(2):026101.
Hibbs, D. A. Jr., 1973. Problems of statistical estimation and causal inference in time-series regression models. In Sociological Methodology, Vol. 5, ed. Heise, D. R., 252308. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Jackman, S. 2005. December. Pooling the polls over an election campaign. Australian Journal of Political Science 40:499517.
Jones, R. 1984. Fitting multivariate models to unequally spaced data. In Time Series Analysis of Irregularly Observed Data. Vol. 25 of Lecture Notes in Statistics, ed. Parzen, E., 158188. New York: Springer.
Jones, R., and Tryon, P. 1987. Continuous time series models for unequally spaced data applied to modeling atomic clocks. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing 8(1): 7181.
Jones, R. H. 1981. Fitting a continuous time autoregression to discrete data. In Applied Time Series Analysis II, ed. Findley, D. F., 651682. New York: Academic Press.
Jones, R. H. 1985. Time series analysis with unequally spaced data. In Time Series in the Time Domain. Vol. 5 of Handbook of Statistics, eds. Hannan, E. J., Krishnaiah, P. R., and Rao, M. M., 157178. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Jones, R. H., and Ackerson, L. M. 1990. Serial correlation in unequally spaced longitudinal data. Biometrika 77(4): 721–31.
Jones, R. H., and Boadi-Boateng, F. 1991. Unequally spaced longitudinal data with AR(1) serial correlation. Biometrics 47(1): 161–75.
Kellstedt, P., McAvoy, E., and Stimson, J. A. 1993. Dynamic analysis with latent constructs. Political Analysis 5(1): 113–50.
Kernell, S. 1978. Explaining presidential popularity. American Political Science Review 72(2):506.
Kriner, D. L. 2006. Examining variance in presidential approval: The case of FDR in World War II. Public Opinion Quarterly 70(1): 2347.
Manger, M. S., Pickup, M. A., and Snijders, T. A. B. 2012. A hierarchy of preferences: A longitudinal network analysis approach to PTA formation. Journal of Conflict Resolution 56(5): 853–78.
Martin, A. D., and Quinn, K. M. 2002. Dynamic ideal point estimation via Markov chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999. Political Analysis 10(2): 134–53.
McAvoy, G. E. 1998. Partisan probing and democratic decisionmaking rethinking the NIMBY syndrome. Policy Studies Journal 26(2): 274–92.
Mueller, J. E. 1970. Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson. American Political Science Review 64(1):18.
Pickup, M. A., and Johnston, R. 2007. Campaign trial heats as electoral information. Electoral Studies 26(2): 460–76.
Pickup, M. A., and Johnston, R. 2008. Campaign trial heats as election forecasts. International Journal of Forecasting 24(2): 272–84.
Pickup, M. A., and Wlezien, C. 2009. On filtering longitudinal public opinion data. Electoral Studies 28(3): 354–67.
Center, Roper. 2013. iPoll databank. Storrs, CT.: The Roper Center, University of Connecticut.
Schweppe, F. C. 1965. Evaluation of likelihood functions for Gaussian signals. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 11(1): 6170.
Shellman, S. M. 2004. Time series intervals and statistical inference: The effects of temporal aggregation on event data analysis. Political Analysis 12(1): 97104.
Stimson, J. A. 1999. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder: Westview Press.
Stimson, J. A. 2008. Using WCALC and the dyad ratios algorithm. jstimson/Software_files/wcalc.pdf (accessed January 22, 2015).
Streb, J. M., Lema, D., and Garofalo, P. 2012. Fall. Temporal aggregation in political budget cycles. Economía 13(1): 3978.
Tiao, G. C., and Wei, W. W. 1976. Effect of temporal aggregation on the dynamic relationship of two time series variables. Biometrika 63(3): 513–23.
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Tahk supplementary material

 PDF (3.6 MB)
3.6 MB

A Continuous-Time, Latent-Variable Model of Time Series Data

  • Alexander M. Tahk (a1)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.