Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Crossing the Boundaries: An Implementation of Two Methods for Projecting Data across Boundary Changes

  • Max Goplerud (a1)
Extract

Much of the data used in social science is aggregated into spatial units, even if the analysis itself does not explicitly incorporate that information. A key concern with such aggregation, however, is that changes in the units of aggregation themselves cause difficulty in comparing data gathered on the old boundaries and the new boundaries. Such changes present serious concerns to researchers who may exclude observations or cases due to a lack of comparable units or omit certain key variables. While geographers have long examined this problem and created methods of projecting data from one spatial unit into another, known as areal interpolation, it is telling that a recent article notes the difficulty for researchers in implementing even the most basic solutions without relying heavily on programming skills or proprietary software.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Fisher, P. F., and Langford, M. 1995. Modelling the errors in areal interpolation between zonal systems by Monte Carlo simulation. Environment and Planning A 27(2): 211–24.
Goplerud, M. 2015. Replication data for: Crossing the boundaries: An implementation of two methods for projecting data across boundary changes. http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/MVIQUD, Harvard Dataverse, V1.
Gotway Crawford, C. A., and Young, L. J. 2004. A spatial view of the ecological inference problem. In Ecological inference: New methodological strategies, eds. King, G., Rosen, O., and Tanner, M. A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gregory, I. 2002. The accuracy of areal interpolation techniques: standardising 19th- and 20th-century census data to allow long-term comparisons. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 26(4): 293314.
Lam, N. S.-N. 1983. Spatial interpolation methods: A review. American Cartographer 10(2): 129–49.
Openshaw, S. 1984. The modifiable areal unit problem. Number No. 28 in concepts and techniques in modern geography. Norwich: Geo Books.
Qiu, F., Zhang, C., and Zhou, Y. 2012. The development of an areal interpolation ArcGIS extension and a comparative study. GIScience & Remote Sensing 49(5): 644–63.
Rallings, C., and Thrasher, M. 2007. Media guide to the new parliamentary constituencies. Plymouth: Local Government Chronicle Elections Centre.
Sadahiro, Y. 1999. Accuracy of areal interpolation: A comparison of alternative methods. Journal of Geographical Systems 1(4): 323–46.
Sadahiro, Y 2000. Accuracy of count data estimated by the point-in-polygon method. Geographical Analysis 32(1): 6489.
Tobler, W. R. 1979. Smooth pycnophylactic interpolation for geographical regions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74(367): 519–30.
Zhang, C., and Qiu, F. 2011. A point-based intelligent approach to areal interpolation. Professional Geographer 63(2): 262–76.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Analysis
  • ISSN: 1047-1987
  • EISSN: 1476-4989
  • URL: /core/journals/political-analysis
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
MathJax
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Goplerud Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material

 Unknown (1.1 MB)
1.1 MB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed