Skip to main content Accessibility help

Do Congressional Candidates Have Reverse Coattails? Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design

  • David E. Broockman (a1)


Although the presidential coattail effect has been an object of frequent study, the question of whether popular congressional candidates boost vote shares in return for their parties' presidential candidates remains unexplored. This article investigates whether so-called “reverse coattails” exist using a regression discontinuity design with congressional district-level data from presidential elections between 1952 and 2004. Taking incumbency to be near-randomly distributed in cases where congressional candidates have just won or lost their previous elections, I find that the numerous substantial advantages of congressional incumbency have no effect on presidential returns for these incumbents' parties. This null finding underscores my claim that the existing coattail literature deserves greater scrutiny. My results also prompt a rethinking of the nature of the advantages that incumbents bring to their campaigns and may help deepen our understanding of partisanship in the United States.



Hide All
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James M. Jr., and Charles Stewart, III. 2000. “Old voters, new voters, and the personal vote: Using redistricting to measure the incumbency advantage.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 1734.
The Democratic Party. 2006. “ASDC Applauds 50 State Strategy.” (accessed August 3, 2008).
Barabak, Mark Z. 2008. “Howard Dean has long-range vision for the Democrats.” Los Angeles Times. May 1.
Bartels, Larry. 2008. Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new gilded age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Butler, Daniel M. 2009. “A regression discontinuity analysis of the incumbency advantage and tenure in the U.S. House.” Electoral Studies 28: 123–28.
Butler, Daniel M., and Butler, Matthew J. 2006. “Splitting the difference? Causal inference and theories of split-party delegations.” Political Analysis 14: 439–55.
Calvert, Randall L., and Ferejohn, John A. 1983. “Coattail voting in recent presidential elections.” American Political Science Review 77: 407–19.
Campbell, James E. 1986. “Predicting seat gains from presidential coattails.” American Journal of Political Science 30: 165–83.
Campbell, James E., and Sumners, Joe A. 1990. “Presidential coattails in senate elections.” American Political Science Review 84: 513–24.
Carson, Jamie L., Engstrom, Erik J., and Roberts, Jason M. 2007. “Candidate quality, the personal vote, and the incumbency advantage in congress.” American Political Science Review 101: 289301.
Cohen, Jeffrey E., Bond, Jon R., Fleisher, Richard, and Hamman, John A. 2000. “State-level presidential approval and senatorial support.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25: 577–90.
Cox, Gary W., and Katz, Jonathan N. 1996. “Why did the incumbency advantage in US House elections grow?American Journal of Political Science 40: 478–97.
Cox, Gary W., and Katz, Jonathan N. 2002. “Elbridge Gerry's salamander: The electoral consequences of the reapportionment revolution.” Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cox, Gary W., and Munger, Michael C. 1989. “Closeness, expenditures, and turnout in the 1982 U.S. House elections.” American Political Science Review 83: 217–31.
Engstrom, Erik J., and Monroe, N. W. 2006. “Testing the basis of incumbency advantage: Strategic candidates and term limits in the California legislature.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 6: 120.
Erikson, Robert S. 1971. “Advantage of incumbency in congressional elections.” Polity 3: 395405.
Erikson, Robert S., and Palfrey, Thomas R. 1998. “Campaign spending and incumbency: An alternative simultaneous equations approach.” Journal of Politics 60: 355–73.
Fair, Ray C. 1978. “The effect of economic events on votes for President.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 60: 159–73.
Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home style: House members in their districts. Longman Publishing Group.
Flemming, Gregory N. 1995. “Presidential coattails in open-seat elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20: 197211.
Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. 1990. “Estimating incumbency advantage without bias.” American Journal of Political Science 34: 1142–64.
Gilgoff, Dan. 2006. “Dean's list.” US News and World Report. July 16.
Green, Donald P., and Gerber, Alan S. 2002. “The downstream benefits of experimentation.” Political Analysis 10: 394402.
Green, Donald P., and Gerber, Alan S. 2008. Get out the vote! How to increase voter turnout. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Hainmueller, Jens, and Kern, Holger Lutz. 2008. “Incumbency as a source of spillover effects in mixed electoral systems: Evidence from a regression-discontinuity design.” Electoral Studies 27: 213–27.
Hogan, Robert E. 2005. “Gubernatorial coattail effects in state legislative elections.” Political Research Quarterly 58: 587–97.
Huber, Gregory A., and Arceneaux, Kevin. 2007. “Identifying the persuasive effects of presidential advertising.” American Journal of Political Science 51: 957–77.
Imbens, Guido W., and Lemieux, Thomas. 2008. “Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice.” Journal of Econometrics 142: 615–35.
Kaplowitz, Stan. 1971. “Using aggregate voting data to measure presidential Coat-tail effects.” 35: 415–9
Koch, Jeffrey W. 2008. “Candidate status, presidential approval, and voting for US senators.” Electoral Studies 19(4): 479–92.
Lee, David S. 2008. “Randomized experiments from non-random selection in US House elections.” Journal of Econometrics 142: 675–97.
Mattei, Franco, and Glasgow, Joshua. 2005. “Presidential coattails, incumbency advantage, and open seats: A district-level analysis of the 1976–2000 US House elections.” Electoral Studies 24: 619–41.
Middleton, Joel A., and Green, Donald P. 2008. “Do community-based voter mobilization campaigns work even in battleground states? Evaluating the effectiveness of MoveOn's 2004 Outreach Campaign.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3: 6382.
Miller, Warren. 1955. “Presidential coattails: A study in political myth and methodology.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 19: 15.
Mondak, Jeffrey J., and McCurley, Carl. 1994. “Cognitive efficiency and the congressional vote—The psychology of coattail voting.” Political Research Quarterly 47: 151–75.
Nehring, Ron. 2009. “A Republican 50-state strategy?Politico. (accessed February 8, 2009).
Operation reverse coattails.” Time, September 10, 1956.,9171,808551,00.html (accessed July 14, 2009).
Pettersson-Lidbom, Per. 2008. “Do parties matter for economic outcomes? A regression-discontinuity approach.” Journal of the European Economic Association 6: 1037–56.
Press, Charles. 1958. “Voting statistics and presidential coattails.” American Political Science Review 52: 1041–50.
Prior, Markus. 2006. “The incumbent in the living room: The rise of television and the incumbency advantage in US House elections.” Journal of Politics 68: 657–73.
Rosenberg, Andy. 2008. Obama's reverse coattails. The Huffington Post Blog. (accessed December 23, 2008).
Rosenstone, Steven J., and Hansen, John M. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Do Congressional Candidates Have Reverse Coattails? Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design

  • David E. Broockman (a1)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.