Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Does Voting by Mail Increase Participation? Using Matching to Analyze a Natural Experiment

  • Thad Kousser (a1) and Megan Mullin (a2)
Abstract

Would holding elections by mail increase voter turnout? Many electoral reform advocates predict that mail ballot elections will boost participation, basing their prediction on the high turnout rate among absentee voters and on the rise in voter turnout after Oregon switched to voting by mail. However, selection problems inherent to studies of absentee voters and Oregon give us important reasons to doubt whether their results would extend to more general applications of voting by mail. In this paper, we isolate the effects of voting in mail ballot elections by taking advantage of a natural experiment in which voters are assigned in a nearly random process to cast their ballots by mail. We use matching methods to ensure that, in our analysis, the demographic characteristics of these voters mirror those of polling-place voters who take part in the same elections. Drawing on data from a large sample of California counties in two general elections, we find that voting by mail does not deliver on the promise of greater participation in general elections. In fact, voters who are assigned to vote by mail turn out at lower rates than those who are sent to a polling place. Analysis of a sample of local special elections, by contrast, indicates that voting by mail can increase turnout in these otherwise low-participation contests.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Abadie, Alberto, Druckker, David, Herr, Jane Leber, and Imbens, Guido W. 2004. Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in Stata. Stata Journal 4: 290311.
Abadie, Alberto, and Imbens, Guido W. 2006. Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica 74: 235–67.
Abramson, Paul R., and Aldrich, John H. 1982. The decline of electoral participation in America. American Political Science Review 76: 502–21.
Barreto, Matt, Streb, Matthew, Guerra, Fernando, and Marks, Mara. 2006. Do absentee voters differ from polling place voters? New evidence from California. Public Opinion Quarterly 70: 224–34.
Berinsky, Adam J., Burns, Nancy, and Traugott, Michael W. 2001. Who votes by mail? A dynamic model of the individual-level consequences of voting-by-mail systems. Public Opinion Quarterly 65: 178–97.
Bradbury, Bill. 2005. A Better Way to Vote. Washington Post, November 19, B07.
Brady, Henry E., and McNulty, John E. 2004. The costs of voting: Evidence from a natural experiment. Presented at the 2004 annual meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, Stanford University, July 29-31.
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Patterson, Samuel C. 1982. Contextual influences on participation in U.S. legislative elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly 7: 359–81.
Cox, Gary W., and Munger, Michael C. 1989. Closeness, expenditures, and turnout in the 1982 U.S. House elections. American Political Science Review 83: 217–31.
Davidow, Julie. 2002. No Polling Places for Some in S.J. Stockton Record , February 2.
Davis, Susan. 2005. Voting by Mail Could Improve American Democracy. Roll Call, June 22.
Dobuzinskis, Alex. 2004. Mail-Only Elections on the Way. Daily News of Los Angeles, April 22, N3.
Dubin, Jeffrey A., and Kalsow, Gretchen A. 1996a. Comparing absentee and precinct voters: A view over time. Political Behavior 18: 369–92.
Dubin, Jeffrey A., and Kalsow, Gretchen A. 1996b. Comparing absentee and precinct voters: Voting on direct legislation. Political Behavior 18: 393411.
Elections Task Force, City of San Diego. 2006. Elections task force recommendation: Mail-only ballot election. San Diego, CA: City of San Diego. http://www.sandiego.gov/electionstaskforce/pdf/reports/mail_balloting_report.pdf (accessed June 26, 2007).
Gerber, Alan S., and Green, Donald P. 2000a. The effect of a nonpartisan get-out-the-vote drive: An experimental study of leafletting. Journal of Politics 62: 846–57.
Gerber, Alan S., and Green, Donald P. 2000b. The effects of canvassing, direct mail, and telephone contact on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review 94: 653–63.
Gerber, Alan S., and Green, Donald P. 2001. Do phone calls increase voter turnout? A field experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly 65: 7585.
Gerber, Alan S., Green, Donald P., and Shachar, Ron. 2003. Voting may be habit forming: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Journal of Political Science 47: 540–50.
Green, Donald P., and Gerber, Alan S. 2004. Get out the vote! How to increase voter turnout. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Green, Donald P., Gerber, Alan S., and Nickerson, David W. 2003. Getting out the vote in local elections: Results from six door-to-door canvassing experiments. Journal of Politics 65: 1083–96.
Hanmer, Michael J., and Traugott, Michael W. 2004. The impact of voting by mail on voter behavior. American Politics Research 32: 375405.
Harris, Rachel. 1999. Voting-by-mail: A look at modernizing the electoral system. CRB Note, Vol. 6, No. 3. Sacramento, CA: California Research Bureau.
Highton, Benjamin. 1997. Easy registration and voter turnout. Journal of Politics 59: 565–75.
Highton, Benjamin, and Wolfinger, Raymond E. 1998. Estimating the effects of the national voter registration act of 1993. Political Behavior 20: 79104.
Ho, Daniel E., Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Stuart, Elizabeth A. 2007. Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis. 10.1093/pan/mpl013.
Imbens, Guido W. 2004. Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review. Review of Economics and Statistics 86: 429.
Imbens, Guido W., and Angrist, Joshua D. 1994. Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica 61: 467–76.
Jackson, Robert A. 1993. Voter mobilization in the 1986 midterm election. Journal of Politics 55: 1081–99.
Jackson, Robert A. 1996. A reassessment of voter mobilization. Political Research Quarterly 49: 331–49.
Karp, Jeffrey A., and Banducci, Susan A. 2000. Going postal: How all-mail elections influence turnout. Political Behavior 22: 223–39.
Karp, Jeffrey A., and Banducci, Susan A. 2001. Absentee voting, mobilization, and participation. American Politics Research 29: 183–95.
Keith, Tamara. 2002. California report. Kissack, Andrea, senior producer. Morning Edition, February 22. San Francisco, CA: KQED-FM.
Newton, Edmund. 1989. Recall Vote Underscores Weight of Absentee Ballot. Los Angeles Times, June 22, A1.
Oliver, J. Eric. 1996. The effects of eligibility restrictions and party activity on absentee voting and overall turnout. American Journal of Political Science 40: 498513.
Patterson, Samuel C., and Caldeira, Gregory A. 1983. Getting out the vote: Participation in gubernatorial elections. American Political Science Review 77: 675–89.
Patterson, Samuel C., and Caldeira, Gregory A. 1985. Mailing in the vote: Correlates and consequences of absentee voting. American Journal of Political Science 29: 766–88.
Pool, Bob. 2002. Some Forced to Mail in their Votes. Los Angeles Times, March 1, part 2, 3.
Powell, G. Bingham Jr. 1986. American voter turnout in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review 80: 1743.
Roberts, Gregory. 2006. Unlikely Allies Fight All-Mail Voting. Seattle Post-Intelligencer, May 18, B2.
Rosenbaum, Paul R., and Rubin, Donald B. 1983. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70: 4155.
Rosenfield, Margaret. 1995. All-mail-ballot elections. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse on Election Administration, Federal Election Commission.
Rosenstone, Steven J., and Hansen, John Mark. 1993. Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
Sbranti, J. N. 2003. It's Not Too Late for Ballots: 30,000 Have Sent in Votes So Far in Modesto's Mayor, Council Runoffs. Modesto Bee, December 9: A1.
Southwell, Patricia L., and Burchett, Justin. 1997. Survey of vote-by-mail in the Senate election in the state of Oregon. PS: Political Science and Politics 30: 53–7.
Southwell, Patricia L., and Burchett, Justin. 2000. The effect of all-mail elections on voter turnout. American Politics Quarterly 28: 72–9.
Stein, Robert M. 1998. Early voting. Public Opinion Quarterly 62: 5769.
Stein, Robert M., and García-Monet, Patricia A. 1997. Voting early but not often. Social Science Quarterly 78: 657–71.
Suo, Steve. 2000. Some ‘Inactive’ Voters Aren't: A Look at Multnomah County Election Records Finds that Postal Errors Caused Some Active Voters to be Purged from the Rolls. The Oregonian, August 27, C01.
Timpone, Richard J. 1998. Structure, behavior, and voter turnout in the United States. American Political Science Review 92: 145–58.
Trevilo, Joseph. 2002. One Person, No Polling Place. LA Weekly, March 1, 17.
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E. 1995. Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism and American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wildermuth, John. 2006. Counties Push for Mail-Only Vote. San Francisco Chronicle, January 12, B3.
Wolfinger, Raymond E., Highton, Benjamin, and Mullin, Megan. 2005. How postregistration laws affect the turnout of registrants. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 5: 123.
Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Rosenstone, Steven J. 1980. Who votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Analysis
  • ISSN: 1047-1987
  • EISSN: 1476-4989
  • URL: /core/journals/political-analysis
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
MathJax

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed