Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Empirical Strategies for Various Manifestations of Multilevel Data

  • Robert J. Franzese (a1)
Abstract

Equivalent separate-subsample (two-step) and pooled-sample (one-step) strategies exist for any multilevel-modeling task, but their relative practicality and efficacy depend on dataset dimensions and properties and researchers' goals. Separate-subsample strategies have difficulties incorporating cross-subsample information, often crucial in time-series cross-section or panel contexts (subsamples small and/or cross-subsample information great) but less relevant in pools of independently random surveys (subsamples large; cross-sample information small). Separate-subsample estimation also complicates retrieval of macro-level-effect estimates, although they remain obtainable and may not be substantively central. Pooled-sample estimation, conversely, struggles with stochastic specifications that differ across levels (e.g., stochastic linear interactions in binary dependent-variable models). Moreover, pooled-sample estimation that models coefficient variation in a theoretically reduced manner rather than allowing each subsample coefficient vector to differ arbitrarily can suffer misspecification ills insofar as this reduced specification is lacking. Often, though, these ills are limited to inefficiencies and standard-error inaccuracies that familiar efficient (e.g., feasible generalized least squares) or consistent-standard-error estimation strategies can satisfactorily redress.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Beck, N., and Katz, J. 1995. “What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series-Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review 89(3): 634647.
Beck, N., and Katz, J. 1996. “Nuisance or Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series-Cross-Section Models.” Political Analysis 6: 136.
Beck, N., and Katz, J. 2005. “Random Coefficient Models for Time-Series-Cross-Section Data.” Presented at the 2001 meetings of the Political Methodology Organization Section of the American Political Science Association.
Bowers, J., and Drake, K. 2005. “EDA for HLM: Visualization When Probabilistic Inference Fails.” Political Analysis doi:10.1093/pan/mpi031.
Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., and Golder, M. 2005. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis doi:10.1093/pan/mpi014.
Davidson, R., and MacKinnon, J. 1993. Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Franzese, R., and Kam, C. 2005. Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis: A Refresher and Some Practical Advice. Unpublished manuscript. (Available at www.personal.umich.edu/∼franzese/Interactions_Michigan.030305.pdf.)
Franzese, R., and Hays, J. 2005. Spatial Econometric Models for Political Science. (Available at www.personal.umich.edu/∼franzese/FranzeseHays.SpatialEcon.Book.pdf.)
Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Jusko, K. L., and Shively, P. 2005. “A Two-Step Strategy for the Analysis of Cross-National Public Opinion Data.” Political Analysis doi:10.1093/pan/mpi030.
Leoni, E. 2005. “How to Analyze Multi-Country Survey Data: Results from Monte Carlo Experiments.” Paper presented at the 2005 Midwest Political Science Association Conference.
Lewis, J., and Linzer, D. 2005. “Estimating Regression Models in which the Dependent Variable Is Based on Estimates.” Political Analysis doi:10.1093/pan/mpi026.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Analysis
  • ISSN: 1047-1987
  • EISSN: 1476-4989
  • URL: /core/journals/political-analysis
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
MathJax
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Franzese et al. supplementary material
Appendix

 PDF (139 KB)
139 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed