Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Estimating Legislators' Preferred Points

  • John Londregan (a1)
Abstract

This paper shows that agnostic spatial models that simultaneously attempt to estimate legislators' preferred points and ideological locations for the proposals on which they vote, such as the well-known NOMINATE model of Poole and Rosenthal, are not identified. The problem arises because the agnostic estimators inherit the granularity of the voting data and, so, cannot recapture the underlying continuous parameter space. I propose an alternative estimator that achieves identification by modeling the agenda.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Estimating Legislators' Preferred Points
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Estimating Legislators' Preferred Points
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Estimating Legislators' Preferred Points
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Birnbaum, A. 1968. “Some Latent Trait Models and Their Use in Inferring an Examinee's Ability.” In Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores, eds. Lord, F. M. and Novick, M. R. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Brady, Henry. 1991. “Traits Versus Issues: Factor Versus Ideal-Point Analysis of Candidate Thermometer Ratings.” Political Analysis 2: 97129.
Cox, D. R., and Hinkely, D. V. 1974. Theoretical Statistics. New York: Chapman and Hall.
Fischer, Gerhard H. 1995. “Derivations of the Rasch Model.” In Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments and Applications, ed. Fischer, Gerhard H. New York: Springer Verlag.
Haberman, S. J. 1977. “Maximum Likelihood Estimates in Exponential Response Models.” Annals of Statistics 5: 815841.
Heckman, James J., and Snyder, James. 1996. “Linear Factor Models of the Demand for Attributes with an Application to Estimating the Preferences of Legislators,” Department of Economics, University of Chicago. Unpublished paper.
Hinich, Melvin J., Cahoon, Lawerence, and Ordeshook, Peter C. 1978. “A Statistical Multidimensional Scaling Method Based on the Spatial Theory of Voting.” In Graphical Representation of Multivariate Data, ed. Wang, P C. New York: Harwood, pp. 243279.
Ladha, Krishna. 1991. “A Spatial Model of Legislative Voting with Perceptual Error.” Public Choice 68: 151174.
Londregan, John B. 2000. Legislative Institutions and Ideology in Chile's Democratic Transition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lord, Frederic M. 1983. “Unbiased Estimates of Ability Parameters, of Their Variance, and of Their Parallel Forms Reliability.” Psychometrika 48: 477482.
Maddala, G. S. 1986. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge.
Marriott, F. H. C., and Pope, J. A. 1954. “Bias in the Estimation of Autocorrelations.” Biometrika 41: 390402.
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1991. “Patterns of Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 35: 228278.
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1996. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rasch, Georg. 1961. “On General Laws and the Meaning of Measurement in Psychology.” Proceedings of the IV Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 4: 321333.
Stokes, Donald. 1963. “Spatial Models of Party Competition.” American Political Science Review 57: 368377.
Thurstone, L. L. 1925. “A Method of Scaling Psychological and Educational Tests.” Journal of Educational Psychology 16: 433451.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Analysis
  • ISSN: 1047-1987
  • EISSN: 1476-4989
  • URL: /core/journals/political-analysis
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
MathJax