Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Randomized Experiments, with Application to the Optimal Planning of the Get-Out-the-Vote Campaign

  • Kosuke Imai (a1) and Aaron Strauss (a2)
Abstract

Although a growing number of political scientists are conducting randomized experiments, many of them only report the average treatment effects and do not systematically explore the variation in treatment effects across subpopulations. This is unfortunate from a scientific point of view because heterogeneous treatment effects can provide additional substantive insights. This current state of affairs is also problematic from a policy makers' perspective since such studies do not identify subgroups for which treatments are effective. In this paper, we propose a formal two-step framework that first identifies heterogeneous treatment effects from a randomized experiment and then uses this information to derive an optimal policy about which treatment should be given to whom. Our proposed method avoids the risk of false discoveries that are likely in post hoc subgroup analysis routinely conducted in the discipline. We discuss our methodology in the context of get-out-the-vote randomized field experiments and show how the proposed two-step framework can be applied in real-world settings.

Copyright
Corresponding author
e-mail: kimai@princeton.edu (corresponding author)
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

James O. Berger 1985. Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.

Allison Dale , and Aaron Strauss . 2009. Don't forget to vote: Text message reminders as a mobilization tool. American Journal of Political Science 53: 787804.

Rajeev Dehejia . 2005. Program evaluation as a decision problem. Journal of Econometrics 125: 141–73.

Stuart J. Pocock , Susan E. Assmann , Laura E. Enos , and Linda E. Kasten 2002. Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems. Statistics in Medicine 21: 2917–30.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Analysis
  • ISSN: 1047-1987
  • EISSN: 1476-4989
  • URL: /core/journals/political-analysis
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
MathJax
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary Materials

Imai and Strauss supplementary material
Appendix

 PDF (67 KB)
67 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 6 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 27 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th April 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.