Skip to main content Accessibility help

Geo-Nested Analysis: Mixed-Methods Research with Spatially Dependent Data

  • Imke Harbers (a1) and Matthew C. Ingram (a2)


Mixed-methods designs, especially those where cases selected for small-N analysis (SNA) are nested within a large-N analysis (LNA), have become increasingly popular. Yet, since the LNA in this approach assumes that units are independently distributed, such designs are unable to account for spatial dependence, and dependence becomes a threat to inference, rather than an issue for empirical or theoretical investigation. This is unfortunate, since research in political science has recently drawn attention to diffusion and interconnectedness more broadly. In this paper we develop a framework for mixed-methods research with spatially dependent data—a framework we label “geo-nested analysis”—where insights gleaned at each step of the research process set the agenda for the next phase and where case selection for SNA is based on diagnostics of a spatial-econometric analysis. We illustrate our framework using data from a seminal study of homicides in the United States.


Corresponding author


Hide All

Authors’ note: Previous versions of this paper were presented at faculty seminars at the University of Amsterdam, at an ECPR Joint Sessions workshop on spatial and network dependence convened by Jos Elkink and Kristian Gleditsch, and at the 2015 meeting of the American Political Science Association. We would like to thank audiences and discussants in these settings, especially Kyle Beardsley, Andrew Bennett, Brian Burgoon, Gustavo Flores-Macias, Lee Seymour, and Steve Wuhs for their suggestions. We gratefully acknowledge helpful feedback from the journal’s anonymous reviewers and editor, as well as from Glenn Deane and Tse-Chuan Yang, who commented on early drafts. We thank the National Consortium on Violence Research (NCOVR) for making available the county-level homicide data and Luc Anselin for making data so accessible ( Replication materials (data and code) are available at Harvard Dataverse, doi:10.7910/DVN/HRLHA4 (Harbers and Ingram 2016). Both authors contributed equally, and all remaining errors are their own.

Contributing Editor: Jonathan Katz



Hide All
Ahram, Ariel. 2011. The theory and method of comparative area studies. Qualitative Research 11(1):6990.
Anselin, Luc. 1988. Spatial econometrics: Methods and models . Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Anselin, Luc. 1995. Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis 27(2):93115.
Anselin, Luc. 2005. Exploring spatial data with GeoDa: A workbook. Urbana, IL: Spatial Analysis Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Anselin, Luc, and Bera, Anil K.. 1998. Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In Handbook of applied economic statistics , ed. Ullah, Aman and Giles, David. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 237289.
Anselin, Luc, and Rey, Sergio J.. 2014. Modern spatial econometrics in practice . Chicago: GeoDa Press.
Baller, Robert D., Anselin, Luc, Messner, Steven F., Deane, Glenn, and Hawkins, Darnell F.. 2001. Structural covariates of US county homicide rates: Incorporating spatial effects. Criminology 39(3):561588.
Beck, Nathaniel, Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Beardsley, Kyle. 2006. Space is more than geography: Using spatial econometrics in the study of political economy. International Studies Quarterly 50(1):2744.
Bell, Andrew, and Jones, Kelvyn. 2015. Explaining fixed effects: Random effects modeling of time-series cross-sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods 3:133153.
Bennett, Andrew, and Checkel, Jeffrey T.. 2015. Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool . New York: Cambridge University Press.
Berry, William D., Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russell L.. 2003. Reassessing the “race to the bottom” in state welfare policy. Journal of Politics 65(2):327349.
Bivand, Roger, and Piras, Gianfranco. 2015. Comparing implementations of estimation methods for spatial econometrics. Journal of Statistical Software 63(18):136.
Brady, Henry E., and McNulty, John E.. 2011. Turning out to vote: The costs of finding and getting to the polling place. American Political Science Review 105(01):115134.
Brinks, Daniel, and Coppedge, Michael. 2006. Diffusion is no illusion neighbor emulation in the third wave of democracy. Comparative Political Studies 39(4):463489.
Brunsdon, Chris A., Fotheringham, Stewart, and Charlton, Martin. 1996. Geographically weighted regression: A method for exploring spatial nonstationarity. Geographical Analysis 28(4):281298.
Charlton, Martin, and Fotheringham, A. Stewart. 2009. Geographically weighted regression. White Paper, National Centre for Geocomputation, National University of Ireland Maynooth URL:∼gisteac/fspat/gwr/gwr_arcgis/GWR_WhitePaper.pdf.
Cho, Wendy K. Tam, Gimpel, James G., and Dyck, Joshua J.. 2006. Residential concentration, political socialization, and voter turnout. Journal of Politics 68(1):156167.
Clark, Tom S., and Linzer, Drew A.. 2015. Should I use fixed or random effects? Political Science Research and Methods 3:399408.
Cliff, Andrew, and Ord, Keith. 1972. Testing for spatial autocorrelation among regression residuals. Geographical Analysis 4(3):267284.
Collier, David, Brady, Henry E., and Seawright, Jason. 2004. Sources of leverage in causal inference: Toward an alternative view of methodology. In Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards , ed. Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 229266.
Darmofal, David. 2006. The political geography of macro-level turnout in American political development. Political Geography 25(2):123150.
Darmofal, David. 2015. Spatial analysis for the social sciences . New York: Cambridge University Press.
Deaton, Angus. 2010. Instruments, randomization, and learning about development. Journal of Economic Literature 48(2):424455.
Dieleman, Joseph L., and Templin, Tara. 2014. Random-effects, fixed-effects and the within-between specification for clustered data in observational health studies: A simulation study. PLoS ONE 9(10): e110257.
Dube, Arindrajit, Dube, Oeindrila, and García-Ponce, Omar. 2013. Cross-border spillover: US gun laws and violence in Mexico. American Political Science Review 107(03):397417.
Erikson, Robert S., and Minnite, Lorraine C.. 2009. Modeling problems in the voter identification-voter turnout debate. Election Law Journal 8(2):85101.
Falleti, Tulia G., and Lynch, Julia F.. 2009. Context and causal mechanisms in political analysis. Comparative Political Studies 42(9):11431166.
Fearon, James D., and Laitin, David D.. 2003. Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review 91(1):7590.
Fjelde, Hanne, and von Uexkull, Nina. 2012. Climate triggers: Rainfall anomalies, vulnerability and communal conflict in Sub-Saharan Africa. Political Geography 31(7):444453.
Florax, Raymond J. G. M., Folmer, Hendrik, and Rey, Sergio J.. 2003. Specification searches in spatial econometrics: The relevance of Hendry’s methodology. Regional Science and Urban Economics 33(5):557579.
Fotheringham, A. Stewart, Brunsdon, Chris, and Charlton, Martin. 2002. Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships . Chichester: Wiley.
Gerring, John. 2007. Case study research: Principles and practices . New York: Cambridge University Press.
Graham, Erin R., Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2013. The diffusion of policy diffusion research in political science. British Journal of Political Science 43(03):673701.
Harbers, Imke, and Ingram, Matthew C.. 2016. Replication data for: Geo-nested analysis: Mixed-methods research with spatially dependent data. doi:10.7910/DVN/HRLHA4. Harvard Dataverse.
Harbers, Imke, and Ingram, Matthew. n.d. Politics in space: Methodological considerations for taking space seriously in subnational comparative research. In Inside countries: Subnational research in comparative politics, ed. Richard Snyder, Agustina Giraudy and Eduardo Moncada (unpublished manuscript).
Hilbink, Lisa. 2012. The origins of positive judicial independence. World Politics 64(04):587621.
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John. 1992. Political parties and electoral mobilization: Political structure, social structure, and the party canvass. American Political Science Review 86(01):7086.
Humphreys, Macartan, and Jacobs, Alan M.. Mixing methods: A Bayesian approach. American Political Science Review 109(4):653673.
Ingram, Matthew C. 2016a. Crafting courts in new democracies: The politics of subnational judicial reform in Brazil and Mexico . New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ingram, Matthew C. 2016b. Mandates, geography, and networks: Explaining subnational diffusion of criminal procedure reform in Mexico. Latin American Politics and Society 58(1):121145.
Ingram, Matthew C. 2016c. Networked justice: Judges, the diffusion of ideas, and legal reform movements in Mexico. Journal of Latin American Studies 48(4):739768.
Kasara, Kimuli, and Suryanarayan, Pavithra. 2015. When do the rich vote less than the poor and why? Explaining turnout inequality across the world. American Journal of Political Science 59(3):613627.
Kelejian, Harry H., and Prucha, Ingmar R.. 2010. Specification and estimation of spatial autoregressive models with autoregressive and heteroskedastic disturbances. Journal of Econometrics 157(1):5367. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.10.025.
King, Gary. 1996. Why context should not count. Political Geography 15(2):159164.
King, Gary. 1997. A solution to the ecological inference problem . Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Koesel, Karrie J., and Bunce, Valerie J.. 2013. Diffusion-proofing: Russian and Chinese responses to waves of popular mobilizations against authoritarian rulers. Perspectives on Politics 11(03):753768.
Land, Kenneth C., McCall, Patricia L., and Cohen, Lawrence E.. 1990. Structural covariates of homicide rates: Are there any invariances across time and social space? American Journal of Sociology 95(4):922963.
Lieberman, Evan S. 2005. Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research. American Political Science Review 99(3):435452.
Messner, Steven F., Anselin, Luc, Baller, Robert D., Hawkins, Darnell F., Deane, Glenn, and Tolnay, Stewart E.. 1999. The spatial patterning of county homicide rates: An application of exploratory spatial data analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 15(4):423450.
Moran, Patrick A. P. 1950. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37:1723.
Nielsen, Richard A. 2016. Case selection via matching. Sociological Methods and Research 45(3):569597.
Nisbett, Richard E. 1993. Violence and US regional culture. American Psychologist 48:441449.
Østby, Gudrun, Nordås, Ragnhild, and Ketil Rød, Jan. 2009. Regional inequalities and civil conflict in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Studies Quarterly 53(2):301324.
Páez, Antonio, Uchida, Takashi, and Miyamoto, Kazuaki. 2002. A general framework for estimation and inference of geographically weighted regression models: 2. Spatial association and model specification tests. Environment and Planning A 34:883904.
Pierskalla, Jan H., and Hollenbach, Florian M.. 2013. Technology and collective action: The effect of cell phone coverage on political violence in Africa. American Political Science Review 107(02):207224.
Powell, G. Bingham. 1986. American voter turnout in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review 80(01):1743.
Przeworski, Adam, and Teune, Henry. 1970. The logic of comparative social inquiry . New York: Wiley.
R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Rohlfing, Ingo. 2008. What you see and what you get: Pitfalls and principles of nested analysis in comparative research. Comparative Political Studies 41(11):14921514.
Rohlfing, Ingo, and Starke, Peter. 2013. Building on solid ground: Robust case selection in multi-method research. Swiss Political Science Review 19(4):492512.
Seawright, Jason. 2016. Multi-method social science: Combining qualitative and quantitative tools . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Seawright, Jason, and Gerring, John. 2008. Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly 61(2):294308.
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2008. The mechanisms of policy diffusion. American Journal of Political Science 52(4):840857.
Shoff, Carla, Yi-Ju Chen, Vivian, and Yang, Tse-Chuan. 2014. When homogeneity meets heterogeneity: The geographically weighted regression with spatial lag approach to prenatal care utilization. Geospatial Health 8(2):557568.
Simmons, Beth A., Dobbin, Frank, and Garrett, Geoffrey. 2008. The global diffusion of markets and democracy . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Soifer, Hillel. n.d. Units of analysis in subnational research. In Inside countries: Subnational research in comparative politics, ed. Richard Snyder, Agustina Giraudy and Eduardo Moncada (unpublished manuscript).
Tiefelsdorf, Michael. 2002. The saddlepoint approximation of Moran’s I and local Moran’s Ii reference distributions and their numerical evaluation. Geographical Analysis 34:187206.
Tolnay, Stewart E., Deane, Glenn, and Beck, Ellwood M.. 1996. Vicarious violence: Spatial effects on southern lynchings, 1890–1919. American Journal of Sociology 102(3):788815.
Trelles, Alejandro, and Carreras, Miguel. 2012. Bullets and votes: Violence and electoral participation in Mexico. Journal of Politics in Latin America 4(2):89123.
Weyland, Kurt. 2012. The Arab spring: Why the surprising similarities with the revolutionary wave of 1848? Perspectives on Politics 10(4):917934.
Yom, Sean. 2015. From methodology to practice inductive iteration in comparative research. Comparative Political Studies 48(5):616644.
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Geo-Nested Analysis: Mixed-Methods Research with Spatially Dependent Data

  • Imke Harbers (a1) and Matthew C. Ingram (a2)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.