Angrist, J. D., and Pischke, J.-S.
2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ansolabehere, S., Snyder, J., and Stewart, C.
2000. Old voters, new voters, and the personal vote: Using redistricting to measure the incumbency advantage. American Journal of Political Science
Brambor, T., and Ceneviva, R.
2011. Incumbency advantage in Brazilian mayoral elections. Working Paper.
Brollo, F., and Troiano, U.
2012. What happens when a woman wins a close election? Evidence from Brazil. Working Paper, University of Alicante.
Caughey, D. M., and Sekhon, J. S.
2011. Elections and the regression-discontinuity design: Lessons from U.S. House races, 1942–2008. Political Analysis
Cox, G. W., and Katz, J. N.
1996. Why did the incumbency advantage in U.S. House elections grow?
American Journal of Political Science
De Magalhaes, L.
2014. Replication data for: Incumbency effects in a comparative perspective: Evidence from Brazilian mayoral elections. IQSS Dataverse Network: http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/25719 (accessed September 12, 2014).
De Magalhaes, L., and Hirvonen, S.
2014. Incumbency effects on political careers: Evidence from Brazil. Mimeo, University of Bristol.
Desposato, S. W.
2006. Parties for rent? Ambition, ideology, and party switching in Brazil's chamber of deputies. American Journal of Political Science
Diermeier, D., Keane, M., and Merlo, A.
2005. A political model of congressional careers. American Economic Review
Erikson, Robert S., 1971. The advantage of incumbency in congressional elections. Polity
Ferreira, F., and Gyourko, J.
2009. Do political parties matter? Evidence from U.S. cities. Quarterly Journal of Economics
Fowler, A., and Hall, A. B.
2012. The incumbency advantage is personal: Evidence from regression discontinuity and term limits in state legislatures. Working Paper, Harvard.
Gelman, A., and King, G.
1990. Estimating incumbency advantage without bias. American Journal of Political Science
Gordon, S. C., Huber, G. A., and Landa, D.
2007. Challenger entry and voter learning. American Political Science Review
Jacobson, G. C.
1987. The marginals never vanished: Incumbency and competition in elections to the U.S. House of Representatives, 1952–82. American Journal of Political Science
Lee, D. S.
2008. Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House elections. Journal of Econometrics
Leoni, E., Pereira, C., and Rennó, L.
2004. Political survival strategies: Political career decisions in the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies. Journal of Latin America Studies
Levitt, S. D., and Wolfram, C. D.
1997. Decomposing the sources of incumbency advantage in the U.S. House. Legislative Studies Quarterly
Linden, L. L.
2004. Are incumbents advantaged? The preference for non-incumbents in Indian national elections. MIT Working Paper.
Mayhew, D. R.
1974. Congresssional elections: The case of the vanishing marginals. Polity
Morgan, S. L., and Winship, C.
2007. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Rubin, D. B.
2005. Causal inference using potential outcomes: Design, modeling, decisions. Journal of the American Statistical Association
Samuels, D. J.
2003. Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sekhon, J. S., and Titiunik, R.
2012. When natural experiments are neither natural nor experiments. American Political Science Review
2009. Incumbency advantage in Brazil: Evidence from municipal mayor elections. Working Paper.
2008. The disadvantaged incumbents: estimating incumbency effects in Indian state legislatures. Public Choice