Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T03:46:33.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction to the Virtual Issue: Recent Innovations in Text Analysis for Social Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Margaret E. Roberts*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego, Social Sciences Building 301, 9500 Gilman Drive, #0521, La Jolla, CA 92093, meroberts@ucsd.edu, MargaretRoberts.net
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Political Methodology 2016 

References

Bailey, Andrew and Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl. 2008. “Does deliberation matter in FOMC monetary policymaking? The Volcker Revolution of 1979.” Political Analysis 16(4):404427.Google Scholar
D'Orazio, Vito, Landis, Steven T, Palmer, Glenn and Schrodt, Philip. 2014. “Separating the Wheat from the Chaff: Applications of Automated Document Classification Using Support Vector Machines.” Political Analysis 22(2):224242.Google Scholar
Elff, Martin. 2013. “A dynamic state-space model of coded political texts.” Political Analysis 21(2):217232.Google Scholar
Grimmer, Justin. 2010. “A Bayesian hierarchical topic model for political texts: Measuring expressed agendas in Senate press releases.” Political Analysis 18(1):135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmer, Justin and Stewart, Brandon M. 2013. “Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts.” Political Analysis 21(3):267297.Google Scholar
Harris, J Andrew. 2015. “What's in a Name? A Method for Extracting Information about Ethnicity from Names.” Political Analysis 23(2):212224.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Daniel J and King, Gary. 2010. “A method of automated nonparametric content analysis for social science.” American Journal of Political Science 54(1):229247.Google Scholar
King, Gary and Lu, Ying. 2008. “Verbal autopsy methods with multiple causes of death.” Statistical Science 23(1):7891.Google Scholar
Klebanov, Beata Beigman, Diermeier, Daniel and Beigman, Eyal. 2008. “Lexical cohesion analysis of political speech.” Political Analysis 16(4):447463.Google Scholar
Lowe, Will. 2008. “Understanding wordscores.” Political Analysis 16(4):356371.Google Scholar
Lowe, Will and Benoit, Kenneth. 2013. “Validating Estimates of Latent Traits from Textual Data Using Human Judgment as a Benchmark.” Political Analysis 21(3):298313.Google Scholar
Lucas, Christopher, Nielsen, Richard A, Roberts, Margaret E, Stewart, Brandon M, Storer, Alex and Tingley, Dustin. 2015. “Computer-Assisted Text Analysis for Comparative Politics.” Political Analysis 23(2):254277.Google Scholar
Monroe, Burt L, Colaresi, Michael P, and Quinn, Kevin M. 2008. “Fightin'words: Lexical feature selection and evaluation for identifying the content of political conflict.” Political Analysis 16(4):372403.Google Scholar
Monroe, Burt L and Schrodt, Philip A. 2008. “Introduction to the Special Issue: The Statistical Analysis of Political Text.” Political Analysis 16(4):351355.Google Scholar
Proksch, Sven-Oliver and Slapin, Jonathan B. 2010. “Position taking in European Parliament speeches.” British Journal of Political Science 40(03):587611.Google Scholar
Roberts, Margaret E, Stewart, Brandon M, Tingley, Dustin, Lucas, Christopher, Leder-Luis, Jetson, Gadarian, Shana Kushner, Albertson, Bethany and Rand, David G. 2014. “Structural Topic Models for Open-Ended Survey Responses.” American Journal of Political Science 58(4):10641082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Atteveldt, Wouter, Kleinnijenhuis, Jan and Ruigrok, Nel. 2008. “Parsing, semantic networks, and political authority using syntactic analysis to extract semantic relations from Dutch newspaper articles.” Political Analysis 16(4):428446.Google Scholar