Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage

  • Charles C. Ragin (a1)
Abstract

Because of its inherently asymmetric nature, set-theoretic analysis offers many interesting contrasts with analysis based on correlations. Until recently, however, social scientists have been slow to embrace set-theoretic approaches. The perception was that this type of analysis is restricted to primitive, binary variables and that it has little or no tolerance for error. With the advent of “fuzzy” sets and the recognition that even rough set-theoretic relations are relevant to theory, these old barriers have crumbled. This paper advances the set-theoretic approach by presenting simple descriptive measures that can be used to evaluate set-theoretic relationships, especially relations between fuzzy sets. The first measure, “consistency,” assesses the degree to which a subset relation has been approximated, whereas the second measure, “coverage,” assesses the empirical relevance of a consistent subset. This paper demonstrates further that set-theoretic coverage can be partitioned in a manner somewhat analogous to the partitioning of explained variation in multiple regression analysis.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Braumoeller, Bear, and Goertz, Gary. 2000. The methodology of necessary conditions. American Journal of Political Science 44(4): 844–58.
De Meur, Gisèie, and Rihoux, Benoît. 2002. L'Analyse Quali-Quantitative Comparée: Approche, Techniques et applications en sciences humaines. Louvain-la-Neuve: Bruylant-Academia.
Dion, Douglas. 1998. Evidence and inference in the comparative case study. Comparative Politics 30(2): 127–45.
George, Alexander. 1979. Case studies and theory development: The method of structured, focussed comparison. In Diplomacy: New approaches in history, theory and policy, ed. Lauren, Paul G., 4368. New York: Free Press.
George, Alexander, and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case studies and theory development. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Goertz, Gary. 2002. The substantive importance of necessary conditions hypotheses. In Necessary conditions: Theory, methodology, and applications, ed. Goertz, Gary and Starr, Harvey, 6594. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Goertz, Gary. 2003. Assessing the importance of necessary or sufficient conditions in fuzzy-set social science. Compasss Working Paper WP2003-7. www.compasss.org/wp.htm.
Goertz, Gary. 2005. Social Science Concepts: A User's Guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Goertz, Gary. 2006. Assessing the trivialness, relevance, and relative importance of necessary or sufficient conditions in social science. Studies in Comparative International Development. Forthcoming.
Goertz, Gary, and Starr, Harvey, eds. 2002. Necessary conditions: Theory, methodology, and applications. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Herrnstein, Richard, and Murray, Charles. 1994. The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.
Kosko, Bart. 1993. Fuzzy thinking: The new science of fuzzy logic. New York: Hyperion.
Lieberson, Stanley. 1985. Making it count: The improvement of social research and theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lieberson, Stanley. 2004. Comments on the use and utility of QCA. Qualitative Methods. Newsletter of the America Political Science Association Organized Section on Qualitative Methods 2(2): 13–4.
Mackie, John L. 1965. Causes and conditionals. American Philosophical Quarterly 2: 245–65.
Peceny, Mark, and Beer, Caroline C. 2002. Dictatorial peace? American Political Science Review 96: 1526.
Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ragin, Charles C. 2000. Fuննy-set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ragin, Charles C. 2003. Recent advanced in fuzzy-set methods and their application to policy questions. Compasss Working Paper WP2003-9. www/compasss.org/wp.htm.
Ragin, Charles C. 2004. From fuzzy sets to crisp truth tables. Compasss Working Paper WP2004-28. www.compasss.org/wp.htm.
Ragin, Charles C. 2006. The Limitations of net effects thinking. In Innovative comparative methods for policy analysis, ed. Grimm, Heike and Rihoux, Benoit, 1341. Springer.
Ragin, Charles C., Drass, Kriss A., and Davey, Sean. 2003. Fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis, version 2.0. www.u.arizona.edu/∼cragin/fsQCA/download/Setup_fsQCA.exe.
Ragin, Charles C., and Giesel, H. 2003. User's guide to fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis. www.u.arizona.edu/∼cragin/fsQCA/download/fsQCAManual.pdf.
Ragin, Charles C., and Rihoux, Benoît. 2004. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): State of the art and prospects. Qualitative Methods. Newsletter of the America Political Science Association Organized Section on Qualitative Methods 2(2): 313.
Rihoux, Benoît. 2003. Bridging the gap between the qualitative and quantitative worlds? A retrospective and prospective view on qualitative comparative analysis. Field Methods 15(4): 351–65.
Smithson, Michael, and Verkuilen, Jay. 2006. Fuzzy set theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Analysis
  • ISSN: 1047-1987
  • EISSN: 1476-4989
  • URL: /core/journals/political-analysis
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
MathJax

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed