Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Simulating Counterfactual Representation

  • Andrew C. Eggers (a1) and Benjamin E. Lauderdale (a2)
Abstract

We show how to use multilevel modeling and post-stratification to estimate legislative outcomes under counterfactual representation schemes that, for example, boost the representation of women or translate votes into seats differently. We apply this technique to two research questions: (1) Would the U.S. Congress be less polarized if state delegations were formed according to the principle of party proportional representation? (2) Would there have been stronger support for legalizing same-sex marriage in the U.K. House of Commons if Parliament more closely reflected the population in gender and age?

Copyright
Corresponding author
e-mail: aeggers@gmail.com
Footnotes
Hide All

Authors' note: The authors thank the associate editor (Justin Grimmer) and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments; Jennifer vanVeerde-Hudson and Rosie Campbell for sharing data; and participants at the 2015 Midwest Political Science Association annual meetings for useful feedback. Replication materials are available online on the Political Analysis Dataverse at http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/54JC6M.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Charles Cameron , David Epstein , and Sharyn O’Halloran . 1996. Do majority-minority districts maximize substantive black representation in Congress? American Political Science Review 90(04): 794812.

Nicholas Carnes . 2012. Does the numerical underrepresentation of the working class in Congress matter? Evidence from roll call voting in the House of Representatives. Legislative Studies Quarterly 37(1): 534.

Nicholas Carnes , and Noam Lupu . 2015. Rethinking the comparative perspective on class and representation: Evidence from Latin America. American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 118.

Andrew Gelman , and Gary King . 1994. A unified method of evaluating electoral systems and redistricting plans. American Journal of Political Science 38(2): 514–54.

Gary King , Michael Tomz , and Jason Wittenberg . 2000. Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44:341–55.

David K. Park , Andrew Gelman , and Joseph Bafumi . 2004. Bayesian multilevel estimation with poststratification: State-level estimates from national polls. Political Analysis 12(4): 375–85.

Carl-Erik Särndal , and Sixten Lundström . 2005. Estimation in surveys with nonresponse. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Boris Shor , and Nolan McCarty . 2011. The ideological mapping of American legislatures. American Political Science Review 105(3): 530–51.

Dennis M. Simon , and Barbara Palmer . 2010. The roll call behavior of men and women in the US House of Representatives, 1937–2008. Politics & Gender 6(02): 225–46.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Analysis
  • ISSN: 1047-1987
  • EISSN: 1476-4989
  • URL: /core/journals/political-analysis
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
MathJax

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 33 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 79 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 4th January 2017 - 19th August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.