Andrews, D. W. K., and Soares, G.
2010. Inference for parameters defined by moment inequalities using generalized moment selection. Econometrica
78: 119–57.
Berinsky, A. J.
2004. Silent voices: Public opinion and political participation in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Biemer, P., and Brown, G.
2005. Model-based estimation of drug use prevalence using item count data. Journal of Official Statistics
21: 287–308.
Blair, G., and Imai, K.
2011b. Replication data for: Statistical analysis of list experiments. hdl:1902.1/17040. The Dataverse Network.
Bullock, W., Imai, K., and Shapiro, J. N.
2011. Statistical analysis of endorsement experiments: Measuring support for militant groups in Pakistan. Political Analysis
19: 363–84.
Burden, B. C.
2000. Voter turnout and the national election studies. Political Analysis
8: 389–98.
Chaudhuri, A., and Christofides, T. C.
2007. Item count technique in estimating the proportion of people with a sensitive feature. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference
137: 589–93.
Chen, X., Dempster, A. P., and Liu, J. S.
1994. Weighted finite population sampling to maximize entropy. Biometrika
81: 457–69.
Corstange, D.
2009. Sensitive questions, truthful answers? Modeling the list experiment with LISTIT. Political Analysis
17(1): 45–63.
Coutts, E., and Jann, B.
2011. Sensitive questions in online surveys: Experimental results for the randomized response technique (RRT) and the unmatched count technique (UCT). Sociological Methods & Research
40: 169–93.
Dalton, D. R., Wimbush, J. C., and Daily, C. M.
1994. Using the unmatched count technique (UCT) to estimate base rates for sensitive behavior. Personnel Psychology
47: 817–29.
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., and Rubin, D. B.
1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Methodological
39(1): 1–38.
Droitcour, J., Caspar, R. A., Hubbard, M. L., Parsley, T. L., Visscher, W., and Ezzati, T. M.
1991. Measurement errors in surveys. In The Item Count Technique as a method of indirect questioning: A review of its development and a case study application, eds. Biemer, P. P., Groves, R. M., Lyberg, L. E., Mathiowetz, N. A., and Sudman, S., 185–210. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Ehm, W.
1991. Binomial approximation to the Poisson binomial distribution. Statistics & Probability Letters
11: 7–16.
Flavin, P., and Keane, M.
2009. How angry am I? Let me count the ways: Question format bias in list experiments. Technical Report, Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame.
Gelman, A., Jakulin, A., Pittau, M. G., and Su, Y.
2008. A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models. Annals of Applied Statistics
2: 1360–83.
Gilens, M., Sniderman, P. M., and Kuklinski, J. H.
1998. Affirmative action and the politics of realignment. British Journal of Political Science
28: 159–83.
Gingerich, D. W.
2010. Understanding off-the-books politics: Conducting inference on the determinants of sensitive behavior with randomized response surveys. Political Analysis
18: 349–80.
Glynn, A. N.
2010. What can we learn with statistical truth serum? Design and analysis of the list experiment. Technical Report, Department of Government, Harvard University.
Gonzalez-Ocantos, E., Kiewet de Jonge, C., Melendez, C., Osorio, J., and Nickerson, D. W.
2010. Vote buying and social desirability bias: Experimental evidence from Nicaragua. Technical Report, Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame.
Holbrook, A. L., and Krosnick, J. A.
2010. Social desirability bias in voter turnout reports: Tests using the item count technique. Public Opinion Quarterly
74 (1): 37–67.
Holland, P. W.
1986. Statistics and causal inference (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association
81: 945–60.
Holland, B. S., and Copenhaver, M. D.
1987. An improved sequentially rejective Bonferroni test procedure. Biometrics
43: 417–23.
Imai, K.
2011. Multivariate regression analysis for the item count technique. Journal of the American Statistical Association
106: 407–16.
Imai, K., King, G., and Stuart, E. A.
2008. Misunderstandings between experimentalists and observationalists about causal inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (Statistics in Society)
171: 481–502.
Janus, A. L.
2010. The influence of social desirability pressures on expressed immigration attitudes. Social Science Quarterly
91: 928–46.
Kane, J. G., Craig, S. C., and Wald, K. D.
2004. Religion and presidential politics in Florida: A list experiment. Social Science Quarterly
85: 281–93.
Kudô, A.
1963. A multivariate analogue of the one-sided test. Biometrika
50: 403–18.
Kuklinski, J. H., Cobb, M. D., and Gilens, M.
1997a. Racial attitudes and the “New South.” Journal of Politics
59: 323–49.
Kuklinski, J. H., Sniderman, P. M., Knight, K., Piazza, T., Tetlock, P. E., Lawrence, G. R., and Mellers, B.
1997b. Racial prejudice and attitudes toward affirmative action. American Journal of Political Science
41: 402–19.
LaBrie, J. W., and Earleywine, M.
2000. Sexual risk behaviors and alcohol: Higher base rates revealed using the unmatched-count technique. Journal of Sex Research
37: 321–26.
Manski, C. F.
2007. Identification for Prediction and Decision. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Miller, J. D.
1984. A new survey technique for studying deviant behavior. PhD diss, The George Washington University.
Newey, W. K., and McFadden, D.
1994. Large sample estimation and hypothesis testing. In Handbook of Econometrics, ed. Engle, R. F. and McFadden, D. L., volume IV, 2111–245. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland.
Perlman, M. D.
1969. One-sided testing problems in multivariate analysis. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics
40: 549–67.
Presser, S., and Stinson, L.
1998. Data collection mode and social desirability bias in self-reported religious attendance. American Sociological Review
63: 137–45.
Raghavarao, D., and Federer, W. T.
1979. Block total response as an alternative to the randomized response method in surveys. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Methodological
41 (1): 40–5.
Rayburn, N. R., Earleywine, M., and Davison, G. C.
2003. An investigation of base rates of anti-gay hate crimes using the unmatched-count technique. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma
6: 137–52.
Redlawsk, D. P., Tolbert, C. J., and Franko, W.
2010. Voters, emotions, and race in 2008: Obama as the first black president. Political Research Quarterly
63: 875–89.
Shapiro, A.
1985. Asymptotic distribution of test statistics in the analysis of moment structures under inequality constraints. Biometrika
72: 133–44.
Sniderman, P. M., and Carmines, E. G.
1997. Reaching Beyond Race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Streb, M. J., Burrell, B., Frederick, B., and Genovese, M. A.
2008. Social desirability effects and support for a female american president. Public Opinion Quarterly
72(1): 76–89.
Tourangeau, R., and Yan, T.
2007. Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin
133: 859–83.
Tsuchiya, T.
2005. Domain estimators for the item count technique. Survey Methodology
31(1): 41–51.
Tsuchiya, T., Hirai, Y., and Ono, S.
2007. A study of the properties of the item count technique. Public Opinon Quarterly
71: 253–72.
Warner, S. L.
1965. Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association
60(309): 63–9.
Wimbush, J. C., and Dalton, D. R.
1997. Base rate for employee theft: Convergence of multiple methods. Journal of Applied Psychology
82: 756–63.
Wolak, F. A.
1991. The local nature of hypothesis tests involving inequality constraints in nonlinear models. Econometrica
59: 981–95.
Zaller, J.
2002. The statistical power of election studies to detect media exposure effects in political campaigns. Election Studies
21: 297–329.
