Aronow, P. M., Coppock, A., Crawford, F. W., and Green, D. P.
2015. Combining list experiment and direct question estimates of sensitive behavior prevalence. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology. doi:10.1093/jssam/smu023.
Azfar, O., and Murrell, P.
2009. Identifying reticent respondents: Assessing the quality of survey data on corruption and values. Economic Development and Cultural Change
Blair, G., and Imai, K.
2012. Statistical analysis of list experiments. Political Analysis
Blair, G., Imai, K., and Lyall, J.
2014. Comparing and combining list and endorsement experiments: Evidence from Afghanistan. American Journal of Political Science
Blair, G., Imai, K., and Zhou, Y.-Y.
2015. Statistical analysis of the randomized response technique. Journal of the American Statistical Association
Böckenholt, U., and van der Heijden, P. G. M.
2007. Item randomized-response models for measuring noncompliance: Risk-return perceptions, social influences, and self-protective responses. Psychometrika
Böckenholt, U., Barlas, S., and van der Heijden, P. G. M.
2009. Do randomized-response designs eliminate response biases? An empirical study of non-compliance behavior. Journal of Applied Econometrics, Special Issue: New Econometric Models in Marketing
Bourke, P. D., and Moran, M. A.
1988. Estimating proportions from randomized response data using the EM algorithm. Journal of the American Statistical Association
2009. Sensitive questions, truthful answers? Modeling the list experiment with LISTIT. Political Analysis
de Jong, M. G., Pieters, R., and Fox, J. P.
2010. Reducing social desirability bias through item randomized response: An application to measure underreported desires. Journal of Marketing Research
de Jong, M. G., Pieters, R., and Stremersch, S.
2012. Analysis of sensitive questions across cultures: An application of multigroup item randomized response theory to sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., and Rubin, D. B.
1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B
Dollar, D., Fisman, R., and Gatti, R.
2001. Are women really the “fairer” sex? Corruption and women in government. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Edgell, S. E., Himmelfarb, S., and Duchan, K. L.
1982. Validity of forced responses in a randomized response model. Sociological Methods & Research
Esarey, Justin, and Chirillo, Gina. 2013. “Fairer sex” or purity myth? Corruption, gender, and institutional context. Politics and Gender
Fox, J. P.
2005. Randomized item response theory models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral statistics
Fox, J. P., and Wyrick, C.
2008. A mixed effects randomized item response model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
Fox, J. P., and Meijer, R. R.
2008. Using item response theory to obtain individual information from randomized response data: An application using cheating data. Applied Psychological Measurement
Fox, J. P., Avetisyan, M., and Palen, J.
2013. Mixture randomized item-response modeling: A smoking behavior validation study. Statistics in Medicine
Franzen, A., and Pointner, S.
2012. Anonymity in the dictator game revisited. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Gilens, M., Sniderman, P. M., and Kuklinski, J. H.
1998. Affirmative action and the politics of realignment. British Journal of Political Science
Gingerich, D. W.
2013. Political institutions and party-directed corruption in South America: Stealing for the team.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gingerich, D. W
2010. Understanding off-the-books politics: Conducting inference on the determinants of sensitive behavior with randomized response surveys. Political Analysis
Gingerich, D. W., Oliveros, V., Corbacho, A., and Ruiz-Vega, M.
2015. Replication files for “When to protect? Using the crosswise model to integrate protected and direct responses in surveys of sensitive behavior.” Available on the Political Analysis Dataverse of Harvard University's Dataverse Network. http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/2AIHQF.
Glynn, A. N.
2013. What can we learn with statistical truth serum? Design and analysis of the list experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly
Goetz, A. M.
2007. Political cleaners: Women as the new anti-corruption force?
Development and Change
Gonzalez-Ocantos, E., De Jonge, C. K., Meléndez, C., Osorio, J., and Nickerson, D. W.
2012. Vote buying and social desirability bias: Experimental evidence from Nicaragua. American Journal of Political Science
2011. Multivariate regression analysis for the item count technique. Journal of the American Statistical Association
Jann, B., Jerke, J., and Krumpal, I.
2012. Asking sensitive questions using the crosswise model an experimental survey measuring plagiarism. Public Opinion Quarterly
Kraay, A., and Murrell, P.
2013. Misunderestimating corruption. Policy Research Working Paper 6488, World Bank, Washington, DC.
2012. Estimating the prevalence of xenophobia and anti-Semitism in Germany: A comparison of randomized response and direct questioning. Social Science Research
Kuklinski, J. H., Sniderman, P. M., Knight, K., Piazza, T., Tetlock, P. E., Lawrence, G. R., and Mellers, B.
1997. Racial prejudice and attitudes toward affirmative action. American Journal of Political Science
Lamb, C. W. Jr. and Stem, D. E. Jr
1978. An empirical validation of the randomized response technique. Journal of Marketing Research
Lara, D., García, S. G., Ellertson, C., Camlin, C., and Suarez, J.
2006. The measure of induced abortion levels in Mexico using randomized response technique. Sociological Methods and Research
Lensvelt-Mulders, G. J. L., Hox, J. J., van der Heijden, P. G. M., and Maas, C. J. M.
2005. Meta-analysis of randomized response research: Thirty years of validation. Sociological Methods and Research
Lensvelt-Mulders, G. J. L., van der Heijden, P. G. M., Laudy, O., and van Gils, G.
2006. A validation of a computer-assisted randomized response survey to estimate the prevalence of fraud in social security. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A
169(Part 2): 305–18.
List, J. A., Berrens, R. P., Bohara, A. K., and Kerkvliet, J.
2004. Examining the role of social isolation on stated preferences. American Economic Review
Magaloni, B., Díaz-Cayeros, A., Romero, V., and Matanock, A.
2012. The enemy at home: Exploring the social roots of criminal organizations in Mexico. Unpublished paper.
Malesky, E. J., Gueorguiev, D. D., and Jensen, N. M.
2015. Monopoly money: Foreign investment and bribery in Vietnam, a survey experiment. American Journal of Political Science
Miller, J. D.
1984. A new survey technique for studying deviant behavior. PhD thesis, George Washington University, Department of Sociology.
Rosenfeld, B., Imai, K., and Shapiro, J.
2014. An empirical validation study of popular survey methodologies for sensitive questions. Unpublished manuscript, Princeton University.
Sung, H.-E. 2003. Fairer sex or fairer system? Gender and corruption revisited. Social Forces
Swamy, Anand, Knack, Young Lee, Stephen, and Azfar, Omar. 2001. Gender and corruption. Journal of Development Economics
Tan, M. T., Tian, G. L., and Tang, M. L.
2009. Sample surveys with sensitive questions: A nonrandomized response approach. American Statistician
Torgler, B., and Valev, N. T.
2010. Gender and public attitudes toward corruption and tax evasion. Contemporary Economic Policy
Tracy, P. E., and Fox, J. A.
1981. The validity of randomized response for sensitive measurements. American Sociological Review
van der Heijden, P. G. M., van Gils, G., Bouts, J., and Hox, J. J.
2000. A comparison of randomized response, computer assisted self interview and face-to-face direct questioning: Eliciting sensitive information in the context of welfare and unemployment benefit fraud. Sociological Methods & Research
Warner, S. L.
1965. Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association
Yu, J. W., Tian, G. L., and Tang, M. L.
2008. Two new models for survey sampling with sensitive characteristic: Design and analysis. Metrika