Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-79b67bcb76-kmcbj Total loading time: 0.328 Render date: 2021-05-17T03:04:02.926Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Adding Another Level Individual Responses to Globalization and Government Welfare Policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2015

Abstract

Literature on the compensation hypothesis overwhelmingly concentrates on either the macro or micro level of the relationship between globalization and welfare spending. This paper explicitly addresses this shortcoming by using individual citizens and country-specific characteristics in a hierarchical model framework. We start by examining individual’s context-conditional reactions to actual economic globalization and welfare generosity; after which, we make the effect of actual economic globalization (welfare generosity) conditional on whether the individual is a globalization winner or loser. In contrast to theoretical expectations, our results indicate that actual economic globalization does not affect people’s perception in the manner expected by the compensation hypothesis. However, individuals display more positive attitudes toward globalization if welfare state generosity is proxied using government spending on active labor market programs.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© The European Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

*

Lena Schaffer Postdoctoral Researcher, ETH Zürich, Center for Comparative and International Studies (CIS) (schaffer@ir.gess.ethz.ch); Gabriele Spilker, Assistant Professor of International Politics, University of Salzburg (gabriele.spilker@sbg.ac.at).

References

Achen, Christopher. 2005. ‘Two-Step Hierarchical Estimation: Beyond Regression Analysis’. Political Analysis 13(4):447456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Andy. 2008. ‘Public Opinion and the Compensation Hypothesis’. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Political Economy Society, November 14--15, 2008. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Bechtel, Michael, Hainmueller, Jens, and Margalit, Yotam. 2014. ‘Preferences Toward International Redistribution: The Divide Over the Eurozone Bailouts’. American Journal of Political Science 58:835856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2004. ‘Between Redistribution and Trade: The Political Economy of Protectionism and Compensation’. In P. K. Bardhan, S. Bowles and M. Wallerstein (eds), Globalization and Egalitarian Redistribution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press and Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Brady, David, Beckfield, Jason, and Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin. 2005. ‘Economic Globalization and the Welfare State in Affluent Democracies, 1975–2001’. American Sociological Review 70:921948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoon, Brian. 2001. ‘Globalization and Welfare Compensation: Disentangling the Ties that Bind’. International Organization 55(3):509551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoon, Brian, and Hiscox, Michael. 2008. ‘The Gender Divide Over International Trade: Why Do Men and Women Have Different Views About Openness to the World Economy’? Working Paper, SSRN. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Carpini, Michael X.D., and Keeter, Scott. 1993. ‘Measuring Political Knowledge: Putting First Things First’. American Journal of Political Science 37(4):11791206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpini, Michael X.D., and Keeter, Scott. 1997. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cusack, Thomas, Iversen, Torben, and Rehm, Philipp. 2005. ‘Risks at Work: The Demand and Supply Sides of Government Redistribution’. Discussion Paper No. SP II 2005–15, Wissenschaftszentrum, Berlin.Google Scholar
Down, Ian. 2007. ‘Trade Openness, Country Size and Economic Volatility: The Compensation Hypothesis Revisited’. Business and Politics 9(2):120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreher, Axel. 2006. ‘Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence from a New Index of Globalization’. Applied Economics 38(10):10911110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreher, Axel, Sturm, Jan-Egbert, and Ursprung, Heinrich. 2008. ‘The Impact of Globalization on the Composition of Government Expenditures: Evidence from Panel Data’. Public Choice 134(3):263292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Economist. 2009. ‘The Return of Economic Nationalism’. The Economist, 5 February, Available at http://www.economist.com/node/13061443, accessed 26 March 2009.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Sean D., and Hearn, Eddie. 2013. ‘Does Compensating the Losers Increase Support for Trade? An Experimental Test of the Embedded Liberalism Thesis’. Foreign Policy Analysis 10(2):116.Google Scholar
Eurobarometer. 2004. ‘Standard Eurobarometer Survey’. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/standard_en.htm, accessed 26 March 2009.Google Scholar
Fordham, Benjamin O. 2008. ‘Economic Interests and Public Support for American Global Activism’. International Organization 62(1):163182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordham, Benjamin O., and Kleinberg, Katja B.. 2012. ‘How Can Economic Interests Influence Support for Free Trade?’. International Organization 66(2):311328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galston, William. 2001. ‘Political Knowledge, Political Engagement, and Civic Education’. Annual Review of Political Science 4(1):217234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey, and Mitchell, Deborah. 2001. ‘Globalization, Government Spending and Taxation in the OECD’. European Journal of Political Research 39(2):145177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Hill, Jennifer. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Genschel, Philipp. 2004. ‘Globalization and the Welfare State: A Retrospective’. Journal of European Public Policy 11(4):613636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, and Hiscox, Michael J.. 2006. ‘Learning to Love Globalization: Education and Individual Attitudes Toward International Trade’. International Organization 60(2):469498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, Jude. 2009. Government Spending and Public Support for Trade in the OECD. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, Jude, Ehrlich, Sean, and Peinhardt, Clint. 2005. ‘Government Spending and Public Support for Trade in the OECD: An Empirical Test of the Embedded Liberalism Thesis’. International Organization 59(2):473494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heston, Alan, Summers, Robert, and Aten, Bettina. 2006. ‘Penn World Table Version 6.2’. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Hicks, Alexander, and Swank, Duane. 1992. ‘Politics, Institutions and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies’. American Political Science Review 86(3):658674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, Ragin, Charles, and Stephens, John. 1993. ‘Social Democracy, Constitutional Structure and the Welfare State’. American Journal of Sociology 99(3):711749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Cusack, Thomas. 2000. ‘The Causes of Welfare State Expansion: Deindustrialization or Globalization?World Politics 52(3):313349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittel, Bernhard, and Winner, Hannes. 2005. ‘How Reliable is Pooled Analysis in Political Economy? The Globalization-Welfare State Nexus Revisited’. European Journal of Political Research 44(2):269293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leoni, Eduardo. 2010. ‘Analyzing Multiple Surveys: Results from Monte Carlo Experiments’. Available at http://eduardoleoni.com/.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward, and Mutz, Diana. 2009. ‘Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety’. International Organization 63(3):425457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayda, Anna Maria, and Rodrik, Dani. 2005. ‘Why Are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist Than Others?’. European Economic Review 49(6):13931430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinhard, Stephanie, and Potrafke, Niklas. 2012. ‘The Globalization-Welfare State Nexus Reconsidered’. Review of International Economics 20(2):271287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oatley, Thomas. 2010. International Political Economy. Boston, MA: Longman.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2001. ‘Post-Industrial Pressures on the Mature Welfare States’. In P. Pierson, (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, 80–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plümper, Thomas, Tröger, Vera, and Manow, Philip. 2005. ‘Panel Data Analysis in Comparative Politics: Linking Method to Theory’. European Journal of Political Research 44(2):327354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potrafke, Niklas. 2009. ‘Did Globalization Restrict Partisan Politics? An Empirical Evaluation of Social Expenditures in a Panel of OECD Countries’. Public Choice 140(1–2):105124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia, and Skrondal, Anders. 2009. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Rehm, Philipp. 2009. ‘Risks and Redistribution: An Individual-Level Analysis’. Comparative Political Studies 42(7):855881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1997. Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1998. ‘Why Do More Open Economies have Bigger Governments?’. Journal of Political Economy 106(5):9971032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1982. ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism and the Post-War Economic Regimes’. International Organization 36(2):195232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth F., and Slaughter, Matthew J.. 2001. ‘What Determines Individual Trade-Policy Preferences?’. Journal of International Economics 54(2):267292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth F., and Slaughter, Matthew J.. 2004. ‘Economic Insecurity and the Globalization of Production’. American Journal of Political Science 48(4):662674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth F., and Slaughter, Matthew J.. 2006. ‘Public Opinion, International Economic Integration, and the Welfare State’. In Pranab, K. Bardhan, Samuel Bowles and Michael Wallerstein (eds), Globalization and Egalitarian Redistribution, 217260. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sears, David O., and Funk, Carolyn L.. 1990. ‘The Limited Effect of Economic Self-Interest on the Political Attitudes of the Mass Public’. Journal of Behavioral Economics 19(3):247271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenbergen, Marco R., and Jones, Bradford S.. 2002. ‘Modeling Multilevel Data Structures’. American Journal of Political Science 46(1):218237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Stefanie. 2010. ‘Globalization and the Welfare State: Testing the Microfoundation of the Compensation Hypothesis’. International Studies Quarterly 54(2):403426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2006. ‘World Development Indicators’. Available at http://go. worldbank.org/U0FSM7AQ40, accessed 26 March 2009.Google Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Adding Another Level Individual Responses to Globalization and Government Welfare Policies
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Adding Another Level Individual Responses to Globalization and Government Welfare Policies
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Adding Another Level Individual Responses to Globalization and Government Welfare Policies
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *