Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-8bbf57454-jcfbx Total loading time: 0.261 Render date: 2022-01-22T00:46:18.354Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Bringing party organization back in: a comparative analysis of party representation in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2019

Nathalie Giger*
Affiliation:
University of Geneva, 40 boulevard du Pont d'Arve, 1211 Genève 4, Geneve, Switzerland
Gijs Schumacher
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam, Postbus 15578 1001, NB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: nathalie.giger@unige.ch

Abstract

In this study we focus on party organizational characteristics as key determinants of party congruence. We examine how the horizontal and vertical integration of parties is linked to representation in comparative perspective. We further focus on how congruence is achieved by detailing our expectation regarding effects on the uncertainty versus bias in the estimates of party constituents' opinion. Exploiting a comparative database on political parties and data from Comparative Studies of Electoral Systems, we show that having a complex organizational structure and being leadership dominated makes parties less representative of their constituencies. These findings carry important implications for the study of political representation but also for the literature on political parties in crisis.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © The European Political Science Association 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J and Ezrow, L (2009) Who do European parties represent? how western European parties represent the policy preferences of opinion leaders. The Journal of Politics 71, 206223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, JF, Merrill, S and Grofman, B (2005) A Unified Theory of Party Competition: A Cross-National Analysis Integrating Spatial and Behavioral Factors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J, Haupt, AB and Stoll, H (2009) What moves parties? the role of public opinion and global economic conditions in western Europe. Comparative Political Studies 42, 611639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, SH (1977) Representation in Italy: Institutionalized Tradition and Electoral Choice. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Belchior, AM (2013) Explaining left–right party congruence across European party systems: a test of micro-, meso-, and macro-level models. Comparative Political Studies 46, 352386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtsson, Å and Wass, H (2011) The representative roles of MPs: a citizen perspective. Scandinavian Political Studies 34, 143167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolleyer, N (2012) New party organization in western Europe: of party hierarchies, stratarchies and federations. Party Politics 18, 315336.Google Scholar
Campbell, A, Converse, P, Miller, W and Stokes, DE (1960) The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Caprara, GV and Zimbardo, PG (2004) Personalizing politics: a congruency model of political preference. American Psychologist 59, 581594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cross, W and Pilet, JB (2015) The Politics of Party Leadership: A Cross-National Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, RJ (1985) Political parties and political representation: party supporters and party elites in nine nations. Comparative Political Studies 18, 267299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, RJ and Wattenberg, MP (Eds.) (2000) Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Downs, A (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Duverger, M (1964) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Egle, C and Henkes, C (2004) In search of social democracy—explaining the politics and policies of the Schröder government 1998–2002. In Haseler, S. and Meyer, H. (eds), Reshaping Social Democracy. Labour and the SPD in the New Century. London: European Research Forum at London Metropolitan University.Google Scholar
Epstein, LD (1967) Political Parties in Western Democracies. New Brunswick: Praeger.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Vazquez, P (2014) And yet it moves: the effect of election platforms on party policy images. Comparative Political Studies 47, 19191944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golder, M and Stramski, J (2010) Ideological congruence and electoral institutions. American Journal of Political Science 54, 90106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmel, R and Janda, K (1982) Parties and their Environments: Limits to Reform?. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Haslam, SA, Reicher, SD and Platow, MJ (2011) The New Psychology of Leadership. Identity, Influence and Power. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Holmberg, S (1999) Collective policy congruence compared. In Miller W., E. (ed), Policy Representation in Western Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 87109.Google Scholar
Huber, JD and Powell, GB (1994) Congruence between citizens and policymakers in two visions of liberal democracy. World Politics 46, 291326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, RS and Mair, P (1993) The evolution of party organizations in Europe: the three faces of party organization. American Review of Politics 14, 593617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, RS and Mair, P (1995) Changing models of party organization and party democracy: the emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics 1, 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchheimer, O (1966) The transformation of western European party systems. In LaPalombara, J. and Weiner, M. (eds), Political Parties and Political Development, New Jersey: Yale University Press, pp. 177200.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, HP (1988) Organization and strategy of Belgian and west German ecology parties: a new dynamic of party politics in western Europe?. Comparative Politics 20, 127154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, HP (1994) The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kölln, A-K and Polk, J (2017) Emancipated party members: examining ideological incongruence within political parties. Party Politics 23, 1829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, K (1988) Spatial models of legislative choice. Legislative Studies Quarterly 13, 259319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lammers, J, Stapel, Da and Galinsky, AD (2010) Power increases hypocrisy: moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior. Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society 21, 737744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawson, K (1980) Political Parties and Linkage: A Comparative Perspective. New Haven: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lenz, GS (2012) Follow the Leader. How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, P (1994) Party organizations: from civil society to the state. In Katz R., S. and Mair, P. (eds), How Parties Organize, London: Sage, pp. 122.Google Scholar
Mair, P (2013) Ruling the Void. The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mattila, M and Raunio, T (2004) Does winning pay? electoral success and government formation in 15 west European countries. European Journal of Political Research 43, 263285.Google Scholar
May, JD (1973) Opinion structure of political parties: the special law of curvilinear disparity. Political Studies 21, 135151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meirowitz, A (2005) Informational party primaries and strategic ambiguity. Journal of Theoretical Politics 17, 107136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michels, R (1915) Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: MacMillan Publishing.Google Scholar
Müller, WC and Strøm, K (Eds.) (1999) Policy, Office, or Votes?: How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muscatell, KA, Morelli, SA, Falk, EB, Way, BM, Pfeifer, JH, Galinsky, AD, Lieberman, MD, Dapretto, M and Eisenberger, NI (2012) Social status modulates neural activity in the mentalizing network. NeuroImage 60, 17711777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, M (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrogorski, M (1902) Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties. New York: Macmillan and Company Limited.Google Scholar
Panebianco, A (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, HH (2010) Differences and changes in Danish party organisations: central party organisation versus parliamentary party group power. The Journal of Legislative Studies 16, 233250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, GB Jr (2004) The quality of democracy: the chain of responsiveness. Journal of Democracy 15, 91105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohrschneider, R and Whitefield, S (2012) The Strain of Representation. How Parties Represent Diverse Voters in Western and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rucker, DD, Dubois, D and Galinsky, AD (2011) Generous paupers and stingy princes: power drives consumer spending on self versus others. Journal of Consumer Research 37, 10151029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, G (1968) Representational systems. International Encyclopedia of the social sciences 13, 470475.Google Scholar
Scarrow, SE (2002) Parties without members? party organization in a changing electoral environment. In Dalton R., J. and Wattenberg, M. (eds), Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scarrow, SE (2007) Political finance in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Political Science 10, 193210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, G (2012) Marx'or the market? intra-party power and social democratic welfare state retrenchment. West European Politics 35, 10241043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, G and Giger, N (2017) Who leads the party? on membership size, selectorates and party oligarchy. Political Studies 65, 162181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, G, De Vries, CE and Vis, B (2013) Why do parties change position? party organization and environmental incentives. The Journal of Politics 75, 464477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, G, van de Wardt, M, Vis, B and Klitgaard, MB (2015) How aspiration to office conditions the impact of government participation on party platform change. American Journal of Political Science 59, 10401054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serra, G (2011) Why primaries? the party's tradeoff between policy and valence. Journal of Theoretical Politics 23, 2151.Google Scholar
Seyd, P (1999) New parties/new politics? a case study of the British Labour Party. Party Politics 5, 383405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somer-Topcu, Z (2015) Everything to everyone: the electoral consequences of the broad-appeal strategy in Europe. American Journal of Political Science 59, 841854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spies, DC and Kaiser, A (2014) Does the mode of candidate selection affect the representativeness of parties?. Party Politics 20, 576590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomassen, J (1994) Empirical research into political representation: failing democracy or failing models. In Jennings M., K. and Mann T., E. (eds), Elections at Home and Abroad: Essays in Honor of Warren Miller, pp. 237–65. Ann Arbor (Mich.): University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Thorlakson, L (2009) Patterns of party integration, influence and autonomy in seven federations. Party Politics 15, 157177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Biezen, I, Mair, P and Poguntke, T (2012) Going, going,…gone? the decline of party membership in contemporary Europe. European journal of political research 51, 2456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M (2004) The Vocation Lectures: ‘Science as a Vocation’ and ‘Politics as a Vocation’. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub.Google Scholar
Weldon, S (2006) Downsize my polity? the impact of size on party membership and member activism. Party Politics 12, 467481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessels, B (1999) System characteristics matter: empirical evidence from ten representation studies. In Miller W., E. (ed), Policy representation in Western democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 137161.Google Scholar
Wolinetz, SB (1993) Reconstructing Dutch social democracy: programmatic and organisational review in the Dutch labour party. West European Politics 12, 97111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Giger and Schumacher Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Giger and Schumacher supplementary material

Giger and Schumacher supplementary material

Download Giger and Schumacher supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 165 KB
2
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Bringing party organization back in: a comparative analysis of party representation in Europe
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Bringing party organization back in: a comparative analysis of party representation in Europe
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Bringing party organization back in: a comparative analysis of party representation in Europe
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *