Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-7lfxl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-17T16:55:13.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

City limits to partisan polarization in the American public

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2021

Amalie Jensen
Affiliation:
Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
William Marble
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Kenneth Scheve*
Affiliation:
Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
Matthew J. Slaughter
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: kenneth.scheve@yale.edu

Abstract

How pervasive is partisan sorting and polarization over public policies in the American public? We examine whether the barriers of partisan sorting and polarization seen in national politics extend to important local policies that shape economic development. To describe the extent of partisan sorting and polarization over local development policies, we employ conjoint survey experiments in representative surveys of eight US metropolitan areas and a hierarchical modeling strategy for studying heterogeneity across respondents. We find that strong partisans are sorted by party in some of their policy opinions, but rarely polarized. The same voters who disagree about national issues have similar preferences about local development issues suggesting a greater scope for bipartisan problem solving at the local level.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Supplementary material: Link

Jensen et al. Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Jensen et al. supplementary material

Jensen et al. supplementary material

Download Jensen et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 608.3 KB