Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-xbbwl Total loading time: 0.229 Render date: 2021-02-28T10:52:52.133Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Conventional and unconventional participation in Latin America: a hierarchical latent class approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2020

R. Michael Alvarez
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA91125, USA;
Gabriel Katz
Affiliation:
University of Exeter, Amory Building, Rennes Drive, Exeter, EX4 4QJ, UK; Universidad Católica del Uruguay, Montevideo, Uruguay;
Ines Levin
Affiliation:
University of California at Irvine, 3151 Social Science Plaza, Irvine, CA92697, USA
Lucas Núñez
Affiliation:
Schar School of Policy and Government, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, 3F4, Fairfax, CA22030, USA
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Building on past research, we implement a hierarchical latent class model to analyze political participation from a comparative perspective. Our methodology allows simultaneously: (i) estimating citizens’ propensity to engage in conventional and unconventional modes of participation; (ii) classifying individuals into underlying “types” capturing within- and cross-country variations in participation; and (iii) assessing how this classification varies with micro- and macro-level factors. We apply our model to Latin American survey data. We show that our method outperforms alternative approaches used to study participation and derive typologies of political engagement. Substantively, we find that the distribution of participatory types is similar throughout the continent, and that it correlates strongly with respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics and crime victimization.

Type
Research Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Alvarez, RM, Levin, I and Núñez, L (2017) The four faces of political participation in Argentina: using latent class analysis to study political behavior. Journal of Politics 79, 13861402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, R (2012) Crime victimization and political participation. American Political Science Review 106, 570587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaydes, L and Linzer, D (2008) The political economy of women's support for fundamentalist Islam. World Politics 60, 576609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlin, R (2011) Distrusting democrats and political participation in new democracies: lessons from Chile. Political Research Quarterly 64, 668687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreras, M and Castañeda-Angarita, N (2014) Who votes in Latin America? a test of three theoretical perspectives. Comparative Political Studies 47, 10791104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dassonneville, R and McAllister, I (2020) The party choice set and satisfaction with democracy. West European Politics 43, 4973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, M, Steenkamp, J-B and Fox, J-P (2007) Relaxing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research using a hierarchical IRT model. Journal of Consumer Research 34, 260278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depaoli, S (2013) Mixture class recovery in GMM under varying degrees of class separation: frequentist versus Bayesian estimation. Psychological Methods 18, 186219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desposato, S and Norrander, B (2008) The gender gap in Latin America: contextual and individual influences on gender and political participation. British Journal of Political Science 39, 141162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, A (2006) Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models. Bayesian Analysis 1, 515533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, A, Wang, J and Vehtari, A (2014) Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian models. Statistics and Computing 24, 9971016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haagenars, J (1993) Loglinear Models with Latent Variables. London, UK:Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamata, A, Kara, Y, Patarapichayatham, C and Lan, P (2018) Evaluation of analysis approaches for latent class analysis with auxiliary linear growth model. Frontiers in Psychology 9, 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, G and Levin, I (2018) A general model of abstention under compulsory voting. Political Science Research and Methods 6, 489508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klesner, J (2007) Social capital and political participation in Latin America. evidence from Argentina, Chile, Mexico, and Peru. Latin American Research Review 42, 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, S (2007) Introduction to Applied Bayesian Statistics and Estimation for Social Scientists. New York, NY:Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ntzoufras, I (2011) Bayesian Modeling using WinBUGS. Hoboken, NJ:Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Oberski, D (2016) Beyond the number of classes: separating substantive from non-substantive dependence in latent class analysis. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification 10, 171182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirani, E (2013) Evaluating contemporary social exclusion in Europe: a hierarchical latent class approach. Quality & Quantity 47, 923941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh, S (2015) Using joint scaling methods to study ideology and representation: evidence from Latin America. Political Analysis 23, 363384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Meer, T, van Deth, J and Scheepers, P (2009) The politicized participant: ideology and political action in 20 democracies. Comparative Political Studies 42, 14261457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez et al. Dataset

Link

Alvarez et al. supplementary material

Online Appendix

PDF 5 MB

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 33
Total number of PDF views: 93 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 28th September 2020 - 28th February 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Conventional and unconventional participation in Latin America: a hierarchical latent class approach
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Conventional and unconventional participation in Latin America: a hierarchical latent class approach
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Conventional and unconventional participation in Latin America: a hierarchical latent class approach
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *