Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5cfd469876-tkzrn Total loading time: 0.606 Render date: 2021-06-24T20:44:23.190Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Measuring networks in the field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2019

Jennifer M. Larson
Affiliation:
Political Science Department, Vanderbilt University, College of Arts and Science, Nashville, TN US
Janet I. Lewis
Affiliation:
Political Science Department, US Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD US
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Measuring networks in the field—usually by asking individuals systematically about their networks–entails complex design choices, with large consequences for the resulting data. Because observations in a network are interconnected, well-established practices from non-network survey settings can lead researchers astray. Despite the increasing focus on networks in political science, little guidance is available for researchers facing high-stakes decisions when designing a study to elicit networks. This paper serves as a practical guide. It offers a simple framework for constructing a network theory, illuminates tradeoffs like measuring more nodes versus more ties per node or asking for names versus selections from a list, and proposes a new technique for cleaning relational data.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The European Political Science Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Alatas, V, Banerjee, A, Chandrasekhar, AG, Hanna, R and Olken, BA (2015) Network structure and the aggregation of information: theory and evidence from Indonesia. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldassarri, D (2015) Cooperative networks: Altruism, group solidarity, reciprocity, and sanctioning in Ugandan producer organizations. American Journal of Sociology 121, 355395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldassarri, D and Grossman, G (2013) The effect of group attachment and social position on prosocial behavior: evidence from lab-in-the-field experiments. PLoS ONE 8, e58750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banerjee, A, Chandrasekhar, AG, Duflo, E and Jackson, MO (2013) The diffusion of microfinance. Science 341, 1236498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banerjee, A, Chandrasekhar, AG, Duflo, E and Jackson, MO (2014) Gossip: identifying central individuals in a social network. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, A, Ensminger, J and Johnson, JC (2009) Social networks and trust in cross-cultural economic experiments. In Cook, KS, Levi, M and Hardin, R (eds). Whom Can We Trust. New York, NY: Russel Sage Foundation, pp. 6590.Google Scholar
Bell, DC, Belli-McQueen, B and Haider, A (2007) Partner naming and forgetting: recall of network members. Social Networks 29, 279299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bidart, C and Charbonneau, J (2011) How to generate personal networks: issues and tools for a sociological perspective. Field Methods 23, 266283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisbee, J and Larson, JM (2017) Testing social science network theories with online network data: an evaluation of external validity. American Political Science Review 111, 502521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, DD (1995) The social structural basis of the organization of persons in memory. Human Nature 6, 379403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brewer, DD (2000) Forgetting in the recall-based elicitation of personal and social networks. Social Networks 22, 2943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breza, E, Chandrasekhar, AG and Larreguy, H (2015) Network centrality and institutional design: evidence from a lab experiment in the field. NBER Working Paper 20309.Google Scholar
Butts, CT (2008) Social network analysis: a methodological introduction. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 11, 1341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, E and Murillo, MV (2013) When parties meet voters: assessing political linkages through partisan networks and distributive expectations in Argentina and Chile. Comparative Political Studies 46, 851882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekhar, A and Lewis, R (2011) Econometrics of sampled networks. Unpublished manuscript, MIT. Available at https://goo.gl/Cp6T02.Google Scholar
Christia, F, Knox, D and Al-Rikabi, J (2017) Networks of sectarianism: experimental evidence on access to services in Baghdad. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Conley, TG and Udry, CR (2010) Learning about a new technology: pineapple in Ghana. The American Economic Review 100, 3569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz, C, Labonne, J and Querubin, P (2014) Politician family networks and electoral outcomes: evidence from the Philippines. In Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
de Zúñiga, HG and Valenzuela, S (2011) The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: online and offline networks, weak ties, and civic engagement. Communication Research 38, 397421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easley, D and Kleinberg, J (2010) Networks, Crowds and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eubank, N (2018) Social networks and the political salience of ethnicity. Working Paper. Available at https://goo.gl/om7U7c.Google Scholar
Eveland, WP and Hively, MH (2009) Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication 59, 205224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eveland, WP Jr, Hutchens, MJ and Morey, AC (2013) Political network size and its antecedents and consequences. Political Communication 30, 371394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fafchamps, M and Gubert, F (2007) Risk sharing and network formation. The American Economic Review 97, 7579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrali, R, Grossman, G, Platas, MR and Rodden, J (2018) Peer effects and externalities in technology adoption: evidence from community reporting in Uganda. Working Paper. Available at: https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/web.sas.upenn.edu/dist/7/228/files/2016/09/FGPR_Sept2018-14xeavm.pdf.Google Scholar
Fischer, CS (1982) What do we mean by “friend”? An inductive study. Social Networks 3, 287306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, CS (2009) The 2004 gss finding of shrunken social networks: an artifact? American Sociological Review 74, 657669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, AP (1995) Social schemata for remembering people: relationships and person attributes in free recall of acquaintances. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology 5, 305324.Google Scholar
Fowler, JH, Heaney, MT, Nickerson, DW, Padgett, JF and Sinclair, B (2011) Causality in political networks. American Politics Research 39, 437480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Bailón, S and Wang, N (2016) Networked discontent: the anatomy of protest campaigns in social media. Social Networks 44, 95104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Ocantos, E, Kiewiet de Jonge, C, Meléndez, C, Osorio, J and Nickerson, DW (2012) Vote buying and social desirability bias: experimental evidence from Nicaragua. American Journal of Political Science 56, 202217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, J and Jansa, JM (2016) Relational concepts, measurement, and data collection. In Victor, JN, Montgomery, AH and Lubell, M (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Political Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hammer, M (1984) Explorations into the meaning of social network interview data. Social Networks 6, 341371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, MO (2010) Social and Economic Networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, MO, Rodriguez-Barraquer, T and Tan, X (2012) Social capital and social quilts: network patterns of favor exchange. The American Economic Review 102, 18571897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, JJ, Settle, JE, Bond, RM, Fariss, CJ, Marlow, C and Fowler, JH (2013) Inferring tie strength from online directed behavior. PloS one 8, e52168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Killworth, PD, McCarty, C, Bernard, HR, Shelley, GA and Johnsen, EC (1998) Estimation of seroprevalence, rape, and homelessness in the United States using a social network approach. Evaluation Review 22, 289308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klofstad, CA, McClurg, SD and Rolfe, M (2009) Measurement of political discussion networks a comparison of two “name generator” procedures. Public Opinion Quarterly 73, 462483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolaczyk, ED (2009) Statistical Analysis of Network Data. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, JM and Lewis, JI (2017) Ethnic networks. American Journal of Political Science 61, 350364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, JM and Lewis, JI (2018) Rumors, kinship networks, and rebel group formation. International Organization 72, 871903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, JM and Rodríguez, P (2018) Not all ties are alike: the attenuating effect of aggregating networks.Google Scholar
Laumann, EO, Marsden, PV and Prensky, D (1989) The boundary specification problem in network analysis. Research Methods in Social Network Analysis 61, 87.Google Scholar
Lee, SH, Kim, P-J and Jeong, H (2006) Statistical properties of sampled networks. Physical Review E 73, 016102.Google ScholarPubMed
Marin, A (2004) Are respondents more likely to list alters with certain characteristics?: Implications for name generator data. Social Networks 26, 289307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marin, A and Hampton, KN (2007) Simplifying the personal network name generator alternatives to traditional multiple and single name generators. Field Methods 19, 163193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, PV (1993) The reliability of network density and composition measures. Social Networks 15, 399421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, PV (2005) Recent developments in network measurement. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis 8, 30.Google Scholar
McCarty, C, Killworth, PD, Bernard, HR, Johnsen, EC and Shelley, GA (2001) Comparing two methods for estimating network size. Human Organization 60, 2839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClurg, SD (2006) The electoral relevance of political talk: examining disagreement and expertise effects in social networks on political participation. American Journal of Political Science 50, 737754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, TH, Salganik, MJ and Zheng, T (2010) How many people do you know?: efficiently estimating personal network size. Journal of the American Statistical Association 105, 5970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moy, P and Gastil, J (2006) Predicting deliberative conversation: the impact of discussion networks, media use, and political cognitions. Political Communication 23, 443460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olguin, DO, Paradiso, JA and Pentland, A (2006) Wearable communicator badge: designing a new platform for revealing organizational dynamics. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Wearable Computers (Student Colloquium), pp. 46.Google Scholar
Paluck, EL, Shepherd, H and Aronow, PM (2016) Changing climates of conflict: a social network experiment in 56 schools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, 566571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkinson, SE (2013) Organizing rebellion: rethinking high-risk mobilization and social networks in war. American Political Science Review 107, 418432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, N, Mobius, MM and Rosenblat, T (2007) Social networks and vaccination decisions. Working Paper Series Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10419/55601.Google Scholar
Scholz, JT, Berardo, R and Kile, B (2008) Do networks solve collective action problems? Credibility, search, and collaboration. Journal of Politics 70, 393406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwedler, J (2006) The third gender: western female researchers in the middle east. PS: Political Science and Politics 39, 425428.Google Scholar
Shakya, HB, Christakis, NA and Fowler, JH (2017) An exploratory comparison of name generator content: data from rural india. Social Networks 48, 157168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shih, V (2015) Research in authoritarian regimes: transparency tradeoffs and solutions. Qualitative and Multi-Method Research: Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section 13, 2022.Google Scholar
Siegel, DA (2011) Social networks in comparative perspective. PS: Political Science and Politics 44, 5154.Google Scholar
Sinclair, B (2012) The social citizen: Peer networks and political behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokhey, AE and Djupe, PA (2014) Name generation in interpersonal political network data: results from a series of experiments. Social Networks 36, 147161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudman, S (1988) Experiments in measuring neighbor and relative social networks. Social Networks 10, 93108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, S and Faust, K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Larson and Lewis supplementary material

Larson and Lewis supplementary material 1

Download Larson and Lewis supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 40 MB
Supplementary material: Link

Larson and Lewis Dataset

Link
5
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Measuring networks in the field
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Measuring networks in the field
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Measuring networks in the field
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *