Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-5tm97 Total loading time: 0.22 Render date: 2021-08-01T15:14:49.706Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Nativist policy: the comparative effects of Trumpian politics on migration decisions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2020

Raymond M Duch
Affiliation:
Nuffield College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Denise Laroze
Affiliation:
Centre for Experimental Social Science and Department of Management, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile
Constantin Reinprecht
Affiliation:
Durham University, School of Government and International Affairs, Durham, UK
Thomas S Robinson
Affiliation:
Durham University, School of Government and International Affairs, Durham, UK
Corresponding

Abstract

Firms in the USA rely on highly skilled immigrants, particularly in the science and engineering sectors. Yet, the recent politics of immigration marks a substantial change to US immigration policy. We implement a conjoint experiment that isolates the causal effect of nativist, anti-immigrant, pronouncements on where skilled potential-migrants choose to immigrate to. While these policies have a significantly negative effect on the destination choices of Chilean and UK student subjects, they have little effect on the choices of Indian and Chinese student subjects. These results are confirmed through an unobtrusive test of subjects’ general immigration destination preferences. Moreover, there is some evidence that the negative effect of these nativist policies are particularly salient for those who self-identify with the Left.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The European Political Science Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, A, Stantcheva, S and Teso, E (2018) Intergenerational mobility and preferences for redistribution. American Economic Review 108, 521–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blinder, S and Richards, L (2018) UK Public Opinion Toward Immigration: Overall Attitudes and Level of Concern. Technical report. The Migration Observatory.Google Scholar
Boeri, T (2010) Immigration to the land of redistribution. Economica 77, 651687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borjas, GJ (1999) Immigration and welfare magnets. Journal of Labor Economics 17, 607637. ISSN , .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunello, G, Garibaldi, P and Wasmer, E. (2007) Higher Education, Innovation and Growth. Education and Training in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czaika, M and Parsons, CR (2017) The gravity of high-skilled migration policies. Demography 54, 603630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dekeyser, E and Freedman, M (2018) Toxic elections: elections and attitudes toward immigration in Europe, Working paper.Google Scholar
Ford, R, Morrell, G and Heath, A (2012) Fewer but better? Public attitudes to immigration. In Park, A, Clery, E, Curtice, J, Phillips, M and Utting, D (eds). British Social Attitudes: the 29th Report. London: NatCen Soc. Res, pp. 2644.Google Scholar
Giulietti, C, Guzi, M, Kahanec, M and Zimmermann, KF (2013) Unemployment benefits and immigration: evidence from the EU. International Journal of Manpower 34, 2438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golder, M (2016) Far right parties in Europe. Annual Review of Political Science 19, 477497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, P and Rao, V (1971) Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. Journal of Marketing Research 8, 355563.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, J and Hiscox, MJ (2007) Educated preferences: explaining individual attitudes toward immigration in Europe. International Organization 61, 399442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmueller, J and Hopkins, DJ (2014) Public attitudes toward immigration. Annual Review of Political Science 17, 225249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmueller, J, Hopkins, DJ and Yamamoto, T (2013) Causal inference in conjoint analysis: understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments. Political Analysis 531, 130.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, J, Hangartner, D and Yamamoto, T (2015) Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 23952400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heath, A and Richards, L (2019) How do Europeans differ in their attitudes to immigration?: Findings from the European Social Survey 2002/03 – 2016/17. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 222. doi: 10.1787/0adf9e55-en.Google Scholar
Hooghe, M and Dassonneville, R (2018) Explaining the trump vote: the effect of racist resentment and anti-immigrant sentiments. PS: Political Science & Politics 51, 528534.Google Scholar
Hunt, J (2011) Which immigrants are most innovative and entrepreneurial? distinctions by entry visa. Journal of Labor Economics 29, 417457, ISSN , .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, WR (2018) The Gift of Global Talent: How Migration Shapes Business, Economy & Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, W and Lincoln, W (2010) The supply side of innovation: H-1B visa reforms and U.S. ethnic invention. Journal of Labor Economics 28, 473508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khoo, SE (2014) Attracting and retaining globally mobile skilled migrants: policy challenges based on Australian research. International Migration 52, 2030, ISSN 14682435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayda, AM (2010) International migration: a panel data analysis of the determinants of bilateral flows. Journal of Population Economics 23, 12491274, ISSN .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, L and Paterson, I (2019) Generational change and attitudes to immigration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46, 665682. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1550170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monogan, JE III and Doctor, AC (2017) Immigration politics and partisan realignment: California, Texas, and the 1994 election. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 17, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C (2012) The Relationship Between Immigration and Nativism in Europe and North America. Technical report. Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Mudde, C (2013) Three decades of populist radical right parties in Western Europe: so what?: Three Decades of Populist Radical Right Parties in Western Europe (in English). European Journal of Political Research 52, 119, ISSN 03044130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Science Board (2018) Science and Engineering Indicators 2018. Technical report. National Science Board, NSB-2018-1. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Ortega, F and Peri, G (2013) The effect of income and immigration policies on international migration. Migration Studies 1, 4774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tani, M (2014) Using a Point System for Selecting Immigrants. Technical report, IZA World of Labor. doi: 10.15185/izawol.24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USCIS (2017) Number of H-1B Petition Filings. Applications and Approvals, Country, Age, Occupation, Industry, Annual Compensation ($), and Education. FY2007–2017. Technical report. UCIS.Google Scholar
Valentino, NA, Soroka, SN, Iyengar, S, Aalberg, T, Duch, R, Fraile, M, Hahn, KS, Hansen, KM, Harell, A, Helbling, M, Jackman, SD and Kobayashi, T (2019) Economic and cultural drivers of immigrant support worldwide. British Journal of Political Science 49, 12011226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadhwa, V (2009) A reverse brain drain. Issues in Science and Technology 25, 4552.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Duch et al. supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Duch et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1 MB

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Nativist policy: the comparative effects of Trumpian politics on migration decisions
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Nativist policy: the comparative effects of Trumpian politics on migration decisions
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Nativist policy: the comparative effects of Trumpian politics on migration decisions
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *