Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-qmkzp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-12T06:32:13.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Polling place changes and political participation: evidence from North Carolina presidential elections, 2008–2016

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

Joshua D. Clinton*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA
Nick Eubank
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA
Adriane Fresh
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA
Michael E. Shepherd
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: josh.clinton@vanderbilt.edu.

Abstract

How do changes in Election Day polling place locations affect voter turnout? We study the behavior of more than 2 million eligible voters across three closely-contested presidential elections (2008–2016) in the swing state of North Carolina. Leveraging within-voter variation in polling place location change over time, we demonstrate that polling place changes reduce Election Day voting on average statewide. However, this effect is almost completely offset by substitution into early voting, suggesting that voters, on average, respond to a change in their polling place by choosing to vote early. While there is heterogeneity in these effects by the distance of the polling place change and the race of the affected voter, the fully offsetting substitution into early voting still obtains. We theorize this is because voters whose polling places change location receive notification mailers, offsetting search costs and priming them to think about the election before election day, driving early voting.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Supplementary material: Link

Clinton et al. Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Clinton et al. supplementary material

Clintonet al. supplementary material
Download Clinton et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.4 MB